Managing unwarranted variation in hospital care - findings from a regional audit in Norway.

Governing board Health care Leadership Outcome assessment Quality improvement Quality of health care

Journal

Research in health services & regions
ISSN: 2730-9827
Titre abrégé: Res Health Serv Reg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9918803680706676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 05 05 2023
accepted: 01 11 2023
medline: 23 8 2024
pubmed: 23 8 2024
entrez: 23 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There has been increasing focus and research over the past decades on defining, identifying, visualizing and reducing unwarranted clinical variation in clinical practice. Both clinician-driven initiatives such as the US based "Choosing Wisely" campaign and the top-down driven "Evidence-based intervention programme (EBI)" launched by NHS UK to improve quality of care by reducing unnecessary interventions have shown marginal results. We present the findings from a mixed-methods audit performed to evaluate the compliance by senior hospital leaders of a new regional strategy to reduce unwarranted variation in outcomes and utilization rates. Seventy-five mid- to senior-division and department leaders from eight hospital trusts in South-Eastern Norway Regional Trust (HSO) were invited to participate in evaluating the response and compliance of the regional leadership strategy for reducing unwarranted variation in patient outcomes and service utilization rates. The audit revealed that the aim of reducing unwanted variation was not clearly communicated by senior HSO management. There was varying use of data from the national quality registers and health atlases for quality improvement. One third of the clinical leaders reported a lack of scrutiny of their work and were insufficiently aware of the HSO's top-management and the hospital's Boards strategic expectations about the importance of reducing unwarranted variation in their hospital utilization. We found that the strategic aim of reducing unwanted clinical variation was not clearly communicated by senior HSO management to hospital boards and senior management. The hospitals could benefit from a better understanding of causes of variation by strengthening their efforts to reduce unwarranted variation in utilization rates as a key element in improving health care quality and patient safety. The findings of the audit are relevant for other healthcare organizations trying to improve their quality and reduce unnecessary variation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/AIM OBJECTIVE
There has been increasing focus and research over the past decades on defining, identifying, visualizing and reducing unwarranted clinical variation in clinical practice. Both clinician-driven initiatives such as the US based "Choosing Wisely" campaign and the top-down driven "Evidence-based intervention programme (EBI)" launched by NHS UK to improve quality of care by reducing unnecessary interventions have shown marginal results. We present the findings from a mixed-methods audit performed to evaluate the compliance by senior hospital leaders of a new regional strategy to reduce unwarranted variation in outcomes and utilization rates.
METHODS METHODS
Seventy-five mid- to senior-division and department leaders from eight hospital trusts in South-Eastern Norway Regional Trust (HSO) were invited to participate in evaluating the response and compliance of the regional leadership strategy for reducing unwarranted variation in patient outcomes and service utilization rates.
RESULTS RESULTS
The audit revealed that the aim of reducing unwanted variation was not clearly communicated by senior HSO management. There was varying use of data from the national quality registers and health atlases for quality improvement. One third of the clinical leaders reported a lack of scrutiny of their work and were insufficiently aware of the HSO's top-management and the hospital's Boards strategic expectations about the importance of reducing unwarranted variation in their hospital utilization.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We found that the strategic aim of reducing unwanted clinical variation was not clearly communicated by senior HSO management to hospital boards and senior management. The hospitals could benefit from a better understanding of causes of variation by strengthening their efforts to reduce unwarranted variation in utilization rates as a key element in improving health care quality and patient safety. The findings of the audit are relevant for other healthcare organizations trying to improve their quality and reduce unnecessary variation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39177902
doi: 10.1007/s43999-023-00033-7
pii: 10.1007/s43999-023-00033-7
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

16

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S et al (2012) Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD000259. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3
Cliff BQ, Acena A, Hirth RA et al (2021) Impact of choosing wisely interventions on low-value medical services: a systematic review. Milbank Q. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12531
doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12531 pubmed: 34402553 pmcid: 8718584
Anderson M, Molloy A, Maynou L et al (2022) Evaluation of the NHS England evidence-based interventions programme: a difference-indifference analysis. BMJ Qual Saf 0:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014478
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014478
Norwegian National Health Atlas  https://www.skde.no/helseatlas/en/v2/kvalitet/ . Accessed 11 Jan 2023
Kristoffersen DT, Helgeland J, Waage HP et al (2015) Survival curves to support quality improvement in hospitals with excess 30-day mortality after acute Myocardial Infarction, cerebral Stroke and hip fracture: a before-after study. BMJ Open 5:e006741. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006741
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006741 pubmed: 25808167 pmcid: 4386226
Holtedahl R, Brox JI, Aune AK et al (2018) Changes in the rate of publicly financed knee arthroscopies: an analysis of data from the Norwegian patient registry from 2012 to 2016. BMJ Open 8:e021199. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021199
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021199 pubmed: 29909370 pmcid: 6009626
Audit reports available on HSO’s webpage: 091-2022 Vedlegg Rapport 9-2021 Uønsket variasjon i kvalitet og forbruk av helsetjenester.PDF (sykehuset-innlandet.no), Accessed 11 Jan 2023
Royal College of Physicians. National Lung Cancer Audit annual report 2018 (2019) https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/national-lung-cancer-audit-nlca-annual-report-2018
Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (2019) Annual public report April 2013-March 2018. https://www.hqip.org.uk/resource/sentinel-stroke-national-audit-programme-annual-report-2019
The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) IIA International Conference 2023 - IIA International Conference 2023 (iiaic.org).  https://docs.ifaci.com/en/ . Accessed 31 May 2023
Norwegian disease registry. https://www.kvalitetsregistre.no/ . Accessed 31 May 2023

Auteurs

H P Eide (HP)

Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Parkgata 36, Hamar, 2317, Norway.

P Barach (P)

Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Jefferson College of Population Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria.

E Søreide (E)

University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.

C Thoresen (C)

Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Parkgata 36, Hamar, 2317, Norway.

O Tjomsland (O)

Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Parkgata 36, Hamar, 2317, Norway. ole.tjomsland@helse-sorost.no.
University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway. ole.tjomsland@helse-sorost.no.

Classifications MeSH