Native botulinum toxin type A vs. redesigned botulinum toxins in pain: What did we learn so far?
Journal
Current opinion in pharmacology
ISSN: 1471-4973
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Pharmacol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966133
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Aug 2024
22 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
24
11
2023
revised:
11
07
2024
accepted:
24
07
2024
medline:
24
8
2024
pubmed:
24
8
2024
entrez:
23
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Driven by the clinical success of botulinum toxin serotype A (BoNT/A) and the need for improved chronic pain management, researchers attempted to develop re-designed botulinum toxin (BoNT)-based molecules as novel analgesics. Various recombinant protein expression strategies including retargeted binding domains, and chimeric toxins combining different serotypes were tested to improve BoNT/A therapeutic safety margin and expand its efficacy. The aim of this review is to re-evaluate the current design strategies for recombinant BoNT-based molecules for pain treatment, compares their analgesic profile against the native BoNT/A, as well as to discuss the main strengths and potential weaknesses of reported approaches.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39178620
pii: S1471-4892(24)00046-8
doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2024.102476
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102476Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.