Efficacy and Side Effects of Topiramate in Treatment of Children With Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome.
Acetazolamide
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Papilledema
Pediatric
Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
Side effects
Topiramate
Journal
Pediatric neurology
ISSN: 1873-5150
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8508183
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jul 2024
08 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
04
02
2024
revised:
17
06
2024
accepted:
28
06
2024
medline:
24
8
2024
pubmed:
24
8
2024
entrez:
23
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Topiramate is often considered as a second-line medication for the treatment of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS), but limited studies exist that evaluate its efficacy in children. Retrospective study of patients aged <21 years with PTCS who were treated with topiramate alone or in combination with acetazolamide was performed. Data regarding clinical courses and visual outcomes were recorded. A total of 46 patients were identified. Three (6.5%) patients were treated with topiramate alone, 31 (67.4%) transitioned to topiramate from acetazolamide, and 12 (26.1%) took both topiramate and acetazolamide concurrently. The median time to resolution of papilledema on topiramate was 0.57 years (interquartile range 0.32 to 0.84). Among eyes with papilledema graded on the Frisen scale at topiramate initiation, 40 of 57 (70.2%) were grade 1, nine of 57 (15.8%) were grade 2, and eight of 57 (14.0%) were grade 3. Twenty-seven of 46 (58.7%) reported headache improvement after starting topiramate. The mean dose of topiramate was 1.3 ± 0.8 mg/kg/day. The most common side effect was patient report of cognitive slowing (10 of 46 [21.7%]). All patients on topiramate monotherapy who were compliant with treatment and follow-up had resolution of papilledema with no evidence of visual function loss. Topiramate can effectively treat PTCS in children with mild to moderate papilledema or in those unable to tolerate acetazolamide. More research is needed to assess the efficacy of topiramate for higher grade papilledema.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Topiramate is often considered as a second-line medication for the treatment of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS), but limited studies exist that evaluate its efficacy in children.
METHODS
METHODS
Retrospective study of patients aged <21 years with PTCS who were treated with topiramate alone or in combination with acetazolamide was performed. Data regarding clinical courses and visual outcomes were recorded.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 46 patients were identified. Three (6.5%) patients were treated with topiramate alone, 31 (67.4%) transitioned to topiramate from acetazolamide, and 12 (26.1%) took both topiramate and acetazolamide concurrently. The median time to resolution of papilledema on topiramate was 0.57 years (interquartile range 0.32 to 0.84). Among eyes with papilledema graded on the Frisen scale at topiramate initiation, 40 of 57 (70.2%) were grade 1, nine of 57 (15.8%) were grade 2, and eight of 57 (14.0%) were grade 3. Twenty-seven of 46 (58.7%) reported headache improvement after starting topiramate. The mean dose of topiramate was 1.3 ± 0.8 mg/kg/day. The most common side effect was patient report of cognitive slowing (10 of 46 [21.7%]). All patients on topiramate monotherapy who were compliant with treatment and follow-up had resolution of papilledema with no evidence of visual function loss.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Topiramate can effectively treat PTCS in children with mild to moderate papilledema or in those unable to tolerate acetazolamide. More research is needed to assess the efficacy of topiramate for higher grade papilledema.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39178652
pii: S0887-8994(24)00251-0
doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.06.015
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
32-37Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.