Readmission Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients With and Without Delayed Graft Function.


Journal

Transplantation proceedings
ISSN: 1873-2623
Titre abrégé: Transplant Proc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0243532

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 30 01 2024
accepted: 01 08 2024
medline: 24 8 2024
pubmed: 24 8 2024
entrez: 23 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common post-transplant event associated with increased resource utilization. As a center with experience in DGF, we aimed to assess differences in readmissions and post-transplant outcomes between patients with and without DGF. This was a retrospective review of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients at Mayo Clinic Arizona between 2015 and 2020. Recipients with at least one early readmission following kidney transplantation were included in the study. Two groups were identified: (1) recipients with DGF who required early readmission and (2) recipients without DGF who required early readmission. Among recipients with DGF, 43.9% (n = 405) required early readmission compared to 29.1% (n = 179) without DGF (P < .0001). There were no differences in the initial hospital length of stay (P = .08), and most recipients in both groups only required a single readmission (61.7% vs 72.1%, P = .02). Recipients with DGF were more likely to have ≥2 readmissions (P = .02) and a higher total readmission rate (P = .006). Recipients with DGF who required readmission also required more outpatient clinic visits (P = .003). When comparing recipients with and without DGF who required readmission, there were no differences in patient (P = .22) or death-censored (P = .72) graft survival. When comparing patients with and without DGF requiring one versus ≥2 readmissions, there were no differences in patient survival (P = .15), however patients with DGF and ≥2 readmissions had lower death-censored graft survival (P = .001). Recipients with DGF are at increased risk of readmission. Transplant center-level changes to reduce readmissions and infections could have an important impact on DGF outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common post-transplant event associated with increased resource utilization. As a center with experience in DGF, we aimed to assess differences in readmissions and post-transplant outcomes between patients with and without DGF.
METHODS METHODS
This was a retrospective review of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients at Mayo Clinic Arizona between 2015 and 2020. Recipients with at least one early readmission following kidney transplantation were included in the study. Two groups were identified: (1) recipients with DGF who required early readmission and (2) recipients without DGF who required early readmission.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among recipients with DGF, 43.9% (n = 405) required early readmission compared to 29.1% (n = 179) without DGF (P < .0001). There were no differences in the initial hospital length of stay (P = .08), and most recipients in both groups only required a single readmission (61.7% vs 72.1%, P = .02). Recipients with DGF were more likely to have ≥2 readmissions (P = .02) and a higher total readmission rate (P = .006). Recipients with DGF who required readmission also required more outpatient clinic visits (P = .003). When comparing recipients with and without DGF who required readmission, there were no differences in patient (P = .22) or death-censored (P = .72) graft survival. When comparing patients with and without DGF requiring one versus ≥2 readmissions, there were no differences in patient survival (P = .15), however patients with DGF and ≥2 readmissions had lower death-censored graft survival (P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Recipients with DGF are at increased risk of readmission. Transplant center-level changes to reduce readmissions and infections could have an important impact on DGF outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39179497
pii: S0041-1345(24)00414-7
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

Auteurs

Rachana Punukollu (R)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.

Alex Nica (A)

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, Arizona.

Stephanie Ohara (S)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.

Kayla Kumm (K)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.

Peter E Frasco (PE)

Division of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.

Pooja Budhiraja (P)

Division of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.

Amit Mathur (A)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.

Raymond Heilman (R)

Division of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.

Caroline C Jadlowiec (CC)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona. Electronic address: jadlowiec.caroline@mayo.edu.

Classifications MeSH