A Global Industry Survey on Post-Approval Change Management and Use of Reliance.
ICH Q12
Pharmaceutical supply
Post-approval changes (PACs)
Regulatory convergence
Reliance
Journal
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
ISSN: 2168-4804
Titre abrégé: Ther Innov Regul Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101597411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Aug 2024
23 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
28
03
2024
accepted:
18
07
2024
medline:
24
8
2024
pubmed:
24
8
2024
entrez:
23
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Post-approval changes (PACs) to the control and manufacturing processes of medicines and vaccines are routinely undertaken and critical to enable both innovation and secure sustained supply. In a world of global supply chains, the existence of divergent national PAC requirements (with additional countries introducing new requirements with potential differences) and other factors including document preparation and response timelines, can lead to long delays in approval (of up to 3-5 years) increasing the risk of disruption and shortages.We undertook an Industry survey in 2023 to assess implementation of ICH Q12, PAC procedures (change categorisation and review timelines) and use of reliance mechanisms across different countries (9 selected ICH Members and 19 Observers). Although this survey revealed limited implementation of Q12 in ICH Member countries, when comparing the data collected with those of a previous survey performed in 2020, we observed a broader adoption of risk-based approaches to variation categorisation (in all countries). This, however, was not reflected in improved timelines for approval.With regards to ICH Q12 adoption, the uptake of Post-Approval Change Management Protocols (PACMPs) was unchanged (with only one country reporting in-use) and implementation gaps were evident for Established Conditions (EC) and the Product Life Cycle Management document (PLCM). The survey found greater awareness of ICH Q12 and its tools compared to 2020, potentially illustrating the positive impact of training efforts. This illustrates the challenges being faced to broaden its implementation and use globally.In the same Industry survey, we also assessed PAC processes across different international countries. Long unpredictable timelines were the major concern across the countries surveyed together with limited capacity of the regulators. Four different CMC changes were selected and categorized by the respondents according to current knowledge of national classifications and timelines in the selected countries and compared with a reference classification and timeline from the European Medicines Agency and the World Health Organisation. This highlighted the lack of harmonisation of many countries with EU/WHO requirements, especially within the ICH Observer group.Last, this survey showed that some use of unilateral forms of reliance to Reference Authorities for PACs is starting. This is a mechanism all countries can employ, regardless of convergence of requirements and expertise, to enhance capacity building and reduce duplication of reviews, streamline variations approval, whilst accelerating patient access to innovation and securing supply.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39179719
doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00681-y
pii: 10.1007/s43441-024-00681-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Drug Information Association, Inc.
Références
Harris R, Vanhooren M, Follmann K, et al. An evaluation of postapproval CMC change timelines. Pharm Eng September/October. 2023;2023:26–33.
Vinther A, Ramnarine E, Gastineau T, et al (2024). Approaches to Design an Efficient, Predictable Global Post-approval Change Management System that Facilitates Continual Improvement and Drug Product Availability. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science. Approaches to Design an Efficient, Predictable Global Post-approval Change Management System that Facilitates Continual Improvement and Drug Product Availability - PubMed (nih.gov). Online ahead of print. Accessed 26 March 2024.
International Council on Harmonisation. ICH Q12 (Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle Management). Q12_Guideline_Step4_2019_1119.pdf (ich.org). Accessed 6 February 2023.
Center for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS). 2021 Project Report - Monitoring Implementation and Adherence to ICH Guidelines. 2021 Project report – Monitoring implementation and adherence to ICH guidelines – CIRS (cirsci.org) - accessed 21 December 2023
ICMRA (2022). Collaborative Pilot Update | International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) – Accessed 21 December 2023
Deavin A, Adam S, Ausborn S, et al. Path forward to optimise post-approval change management and facilitate continuous supply of medicines and vaccines of high quality worldwide. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022;57:7–11.
doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00426-9
pubmed: 35917091
pmcid: 9345009
Deavin, A. On Behalf of EFPIA (2020). Survey by EFPIA Regulatory Networks Concerning ICH Q12 Implementation Across International Countries Involved in ICH. Presented at Accelerating CMC Workshop (diaglobal.org). Accessed 21 December 2023.
ICH Official Website, Members & Observers, ICH Official web site : ICH. Accessed 8 February 2024.
EFPIA webpage - EFPIA Homepage. Accessed 6 February 2024.
ICMRA Official Website, Participating Authorities, ICMRA Membership Country/Region and Regulatory Authority' s website | International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA). Accessed 8 February 2024.
WHO (2016). General guidance on variations to multisource pharmaceutical products. WHO Technical Report Series No. 996, Annex 10, 2016:348 – 358.
WHO (2018). Guidelines on procedures and data requirements for changes to approved biotherapeutic products. WHO Technical Report Series No. 1011, Annex 3, 2018:181 – 275.
WHO (2015). Guidelines on procedures and data requirements for changes to approved vaccines. WHO Technical Report Series No. 993, Annex 4, 2015:175 – 259.
European Commission (2013). Guidelines on the details of the various categories of variations, on the operation of the procedures laid down in Chapters II, IIa, III and IV of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1234/2008 of 24 November 2008 concerning the examination of variations to the terms of marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use and veterinary medicinal products and on the documentation to be submitted pursuant to those procedures (2013/C 223/01 LexUriServ.do (europa.eu)
WHO (2021). TRS 1033 - Annex 10: Good reliance practices in the regulation of medical products: high level principles and considerations (who.int). Accessed 21 December 2023.
ICH Official Website, ICH Guideline Implementation. ICH Official web site : ICH. Accessed 17 June 2024.
NMPA (2023). NMPA official notice announcing the implementation of ICH Q12 in China (nmpa.gov.cn) effective immediately starting from August 25, 2023.
De Lucia ML, Comesaña C, Rodriguez H, et al. Impact assessment of divergence on post-approval changes classifications of Latin America region With Europe and the United States, and propositions to harmonize classification based on risk as a path to build the trust between national regulatory agencies. J Clin Therapeutics. 2024;46(2):164–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.11.005
Gastineau T, Ban C, Basso A, et al. Worldwide regulatory reliance launching a pilot on a chemistry, manufacturing and control post approval change for a vaccine. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2023.012850 .
doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2023.012850
pubmed: 37973190
ICMRA-ICH-IPRP-PICS Joint Work Plan for Harmonisation and Convergence Work to Advance Development of a Regulatory Pharmaceutical Quality Knowledge Management Capability; Version1: September 2023. pqkms_jrp_work_plan_sep2023.pdf (icmra.info). Accessed 6 February 2024.