Facilitating co-research: lessons learned from reflection forms within three participatory action research projects.


Journal

Health research policy and systems
ISSN: 1478-4505
Titre abrégé: Health Res Policy Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170481

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 19 10 2023
accepted: 03 08 2024
medline: 24 8 2024
pubmed: 24 8 2024
entrez: 23 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Mutual learning and shared decision-making are key elements of Participatory Action Research (PAR), highlighting the important role of the facilitator to support this. This study aims to illustrate how a facilitator can contribute to successful PAR sessions based on the reflection of three PAR projects. Participatory sessions took place with adolescents for 3-4 school years. After each session (n = 252 sessions across three projects), facilitators filled in a reflection form that assessed the group process and their facilitating role. Facilitators independently coded a selection of 135 reflection forms partly deductive and partly inductive based on core PAR principles derived from a pragmatic literature search. A well-prepared session - for example, including active and creative participatory methods and a clearly stated goal - contributed to efficiency and the necessary flexibility. Making agreements, making sure everyone is heard and taking 'fun-time' appeared important for creating and maintaining a safe, functional and positive atmosphere. Finally, facilitators needed to encourage co-researchers to take the lead and adapt to the group dynamics, to ensure ownership and shared decision-making. In-depth qualitative analyses of a standardized reflection form used in three different PAR projects resulted in various lessons to support facilitators in collaborating with co-researchers in PAR projects.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Mutual learning and shared decision-making are key elements of Participatory Action Research (PAR), highlighting the important role of the facilitator to support this. This study aims to illustrate how a facilitator can contribute to successful PAR sessions based on the reflection of three PAR projects.
METHODS METHODS
Participatory sessions took place with adolescents for 3-4 school years. After each session (n = 252 sessions across three projects), facilitators filled in a reflection form that assessed the group process and their facilitating role. Facilitators independently coded a selection of 135 reflection forms partly deductive and partly inductive based on core PAR principles derived from a pragmatic literature search.
RESULTS RESULTS
A well-prepared session - for example, including active and creative participatory methods and a clearly stated goal - contributed to efficiency and the necessary flexibility. Making agreements, making sure everyone is heard and taking 'fun-time' appeared important for creating and maintaining a safe, functional and positive atmosphere. Finally, facilitators needed to encourage co-researchers to take the lead and adapt to the group dynamics, to ensure ownership and shared decision-making.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In-depth qualitative analyses of a standardized reflection form used in three different PAR projects resulted in various lessons to support facilitators in collaborating with co-researchers in PAR projects.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39180111
doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01210-x
pii: 10.1186/s12961-024-01210-x
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

117

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 101569
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China
ID : BOF DOC2018003201
Organisme : Hartstichting
ID : CVON2016-07
Organisme : ZonMw
ID : CVON2016-07
Pays : Netherlands

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Baum F, MacDougall C, Smith D. Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(10):854.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.028662 pubmed: 16973531 pmcid: 2566051
Kornet-van der Aa D, Altenburg T, van Randeraad-van der Zee C, Chinapaw M. The effectiveness and promising strategies of obesity prevention and treatment programmes among adolescents from disadvantaged backgrounds: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2017;18(5):581–93.
doi: 10.1111/obr.12519 pubmed: 28273680
Bozlak CT, Kelley MA. Participatory action research with youth. In: Participatory action research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 67.
Kim J. Youth involvement in participatory action research (PAR). Crit Soc Work. 2016. https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v17i1.5891 .
doi: 10.22329/csw.v17i1.5891
Wright M. International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR) (2013) position paper 1: what is participatory health research? Version: Mai 2013. Berlin: International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research; 2013.
Wright MT, Springett J, Kongats K. What is participatory health research? In: Wright MT, Kongats K, editors. Participatory health research: voices from around the world. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 3–15.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92177-8_1
Watt D. On becoming a qualitative researcher: the value of reflexivity. Qual Rep. 2007;12(1):82–101.
Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage; 2018.
Dewar B, Sharp C. Appreciative dialogue for co-facilitation in action research and practice development. Int Pract Dev J. 2013;3(2). https://www.fons.org/library/journal/volume3-issue2/article7/
Boyden J, Ennew J, editors. Children in focus—a manual for participatory research with children. Save the Children Sweden; 1997.
Anselma M, Altenburg T, Chinapaw M. Kids in action: the protocol of a youth participatory action research project to promote physical activity and dietary behaviour. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3): e025584.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025584 pubmed: 30928943 pmcid: 6475341
Anselma M, Altenburg TM, Emke H, van Nassau F, Jurg M, Ruiter RAC, et al. Co-designing obesity prevention interventions together with children: intervention mapping meets youth-led participatory action research. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):130.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0891-5 pubmed: 31831006 pmcid: 6909512
Vandendriessche A, Deforche B, Dhondt K, Altenburg TM, Verloigne M. Combining participatory action research with intervention mapping to develop and plan the implementation and evaluation of a healthy sleep intervention for adolescents. Health Promot Perspect. 2023;13(4):316.
doi: 10.34172/hpp.2023.37 pubmed: 38235009 pmcid: 10790120
Waterlander WE, Luna Pinzon A, Verhoeff A, Den Hertog K, Altenburg T, Dijkstra C, et al. A system dynamics and participatory action research approach to promote healthy living and a healthy weight among 10–14-year-old adolescents in Amsterdam: the LIKE programme. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(14):4928.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17144928 pubmed: 32650571 pmcid: 7400640
Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. J Posit Psychol. 2017;12(3):297–8.
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Abma T, Lips S, Schrijver J. Sowing seeds to harvest healthier adults: the working principles and impact of participatory health research with children in a primary school context. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2):451.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020451 pubmed: 32284518 pmcid: 7014369
Ansell N, Robson E, Hajdu F, van Blerk L. Learning from young people about their lives: using participatory methods to research the impacts of AIDS in southern Africa. Children’s Geogr. 2012;10(2):169–86.
doi: 10.1080/14733285.2012.667918
Haarmans H. 2018-01, editor: Facilitations Academy. 2018.
Jurrius K. Uit de spagaat! Naar een kwaliteitsraamwerk voor Participatief Jongeren Onderzoek. Utrecht University; 2013.
Ozer EJ. Youth-led participatory action research: developmental and equity perspectives. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2016;50:189–207.
doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.11.006 pubmed: 26956074
Shamrova DP, Cummings CE. Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: an integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organizations, and communities. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;81:400–12.
doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.022
Vandael K, Dewaele A, Buysse A, Westerduin S. Guide to co-creation. Ghent: Ghent University & Ministry of Makers; 2018.
Ozer EJ, Ritterman ML, Wanis MG. Participatory action research (PAR) in middle school: opportunities, constraints, and key processes. Am J Community Psychol. 2010;46(1–2):152–66.
doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9335-8 pubmed: 20676754 pmcid: 2921496
Horgan D. Child participatory research methods: attempts to go ‘deeper.’ Childhood. 2016;24:245–59.
doi: 10.1177/0907568216647787
Schiller U, Jaffray P, Ridley T, Du Plessis C. Facilitating a participatory action learning action research process in a higher educational context. Action Res. 2021;19(2):301–17.
doi: 10.1177/1476750318776715
Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Berkeley: Univ of California Press; 1986.
Dodson L, Piatelli D, Schmalzbauer L. Researching inequality through interpretive collaborations: shifting power and the unspoken contract. Qual Inq. 2007;13(6):821–43.
doi: 10.1177/1077800407304458
Wilson N, Dasho S, Martin AC, Wallerstein N, Wang CC, Minkler M. Engaging young adolescents in social action through photovoice: the youth empowerment strategies (YES!) project. J Early Adolesc. 2007;27(2):241–61.
doi: 10.1177/0272431606294834
Flicker S, Maley O, Ridgley A, Biscope S, Lombardo C, Skinner HA. e-PAR: using technology and participatory action research to engage youth in health promotion. Action Res. 2008;6(3):285–303.
doi: 10.1177/1476750307083711
Anderson AJ. A qualitative systematic review of youth participatory action research implementation in US high schools. Am J Community Psychol. 2020;65(1–2):242–57.
doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12389 pubmed: 31489643
Fox R. Resisting participation: critiquing participatory research methodologies with young people. J Youth Stud. 2013;16(8):986–99.
doi: 10.1080/13676261.2013.815698
Schaffer MA. A virtue ethics guide to best practices for community-based participatory research. Progr Community Health Partnersh Res Educ Action. 2009;3(1):83–90.
doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0053
Malorni A, Lea CH III, Richards-Schuster K, Spencer MS. Facilitating youth participatory action research (YPAR): a scoping review of relational practice in US youth development & out-of-school time projects. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022;136: 106399.
doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106399

Auteurs

Helga Emke (H)

Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.emke@amsterdamumc.nl.
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.emke@amsterdamumc.nl.
Health Behaviour and Chronic Diseases and Methodology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. h.emke@amsterdamumc.nl.

Ann Vandendriessche (A)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Mai Chinapaw (M)

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Behaviour and Chronic Diseases and Methodology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Benedicte Deforche (B)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Movement and Nutrition for Health and Performance Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Maïté Verloigne (M)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Teatske Altenburg (T)

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Behaviour and Chronic Diseases and Methodology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Manou Anselma (M)

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mulier Instituut, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH