Radiographers' perspectives on immobilisation and restraint mechanisms in paediatric radiography.

Digital radiography Immobilisation Paediatric radiology Radiography Restraint mechanisms

Journal

Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences
ISSN: 1876-7982
Titre abrégé: J Med Imaging Radiat Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101469694

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 02 04 2024
revised: 04 07 2024
accepted: 23 07 2024
medline: 26 8 2024
pubmed: 26 8 2024
entrez: 24 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The utilisation of immobilisation or restraint during paediatric radiography is a multifactorial issue with associated legal and ethical considerations. Current practice regularly presents challenges for radiographers, with a notable absence of any professional best-practice guidance. This study investigated radiographers' perspectives in Ireland on the use of immobilisation or restraint methods and the factors influencing these choices and aimed to fill the 20-year gap in European radiographers' perspectives gaining an up-to-date understanding and contribute to the global conversation in this regard. An anonymous online survey design was constructed using the Google Forms platform and distributed to hospital radiology departments across the Southern region of Ireland. Additionally, a short survey was send to the head of the nine radiology departments to audit the existing availability of immobilisation and/or restraint devices for paediatric radiography. Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) were undertaken. Bar charts were utilised where appropriate to display trends. One hundered and three responses were received. The majority of radiographers reported using immobilisation (95 %) or restraint (89 %) techniques during paediatric radiography, although 70 % acknowledged the lack of training regarding restraint techniques. However, 93 % reported trying alternative techniques such as distraction and negotiation to avoid immobilisation or restraint. A desire for further guidance and training was reported, with 80 % of respondents noting training as essential or potentially beneficial. Ambiguity remains surrounding the distinction between the terms "restraint" and "immobilisation" in paediatric radiography. Radiographers' use of restraint and immobilisation during paediatric radiography is influenced by the child's age, distress level, radiation protection and safety, and the ability of the child to understand instructions. Appropriate up-to-date guidelines and training would be recommended to clarify terminology and promote the safe practice of restraint and immobilisation during paediatric radiography.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39180904
pii: S1939-8654(24)00469-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101738
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101738

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Melissa Breen (M)

Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland.

Rena Young (R)

Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland.

Helle Precht (H)

Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Kolding, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Health Sciences Research Centre, Radiography education, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark. Electronic address: hepr@ucl.dk.

Mark McEntee (M)

Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Kolding, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.

Classifications MeSH