Informing creation of the FEEDS Toolkit to support parent-delivered interventions for eating, drinking and swallowing difficulties in young children with neurodisability: intervention use by neurodevelopmental diagnosis and healthcare professional role.


Journal

BMJ paediatrics open
ISSN: 2399-9772
Titre abrégé: BMJ Paediatr Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101715309

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 14 11 2023
accepted: 20 06 2024
medline: 26 8 2024
pubmed: 26 8 2024
entrez: 24 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The FEEDS (Focus on Early Eating, Drinking and Swallowing) study focused on interventions used to improve feeding for children with neurodisability and eating, drinking and swallowing difficulties (EDSD), and the outcomes viewed as important by healthcare professionals (HPs) and parent carers. The FEEDS Toolkit was created subsequently as an intervention decision aid to be used collaboratively by parent carers and HPs. This study aimed to inform on current intervention practices and influence toolkit design by ascertaining whether specific intervention use varied by a child's main diagnosis and by specific HP role. FEEDS survey data were grouped by child's main diagnosis and HP role. Main diagnoses included autism spectrum disorder (ASD) n=183; Down syndrome (DS) n=69; cerebral palsy (CP) n=30). HPs included were speech and language therapists (SLT) n=131; occupational therapists (OT) n=63; physiotherapists (PT) n=57; paediatricians n=50; dieticians n=40; nurses n=32 and health visitors n=14. Most interventions were used commonly across diagnoses. However, some interventions were used more commonly with specific conditions, for example, positioning (CP 85%, DS 70%, ASD 23%, strategies/programmes aimed at changing behaviour at mealtimes (ASD 52%, CP 8%, DS 11%); visual supports (ASD 58%, CP 0%, DS 21%). HPs reported using a broad range of interventions, SLTs (mean=13.9), dieticians (12.3), OTs (12.7) and paediatricians (11.1). There was overlap between intervention use and HP role, for example, positioning (100% PT, 97% SLT, 94% OT, 73% paediatricians and 69% nurses). Interdisciplinary working is common when managing EDSD, with all HP types using multiple interventions. A child's main diagnosis does not substantially influence intervention use, and the individual context of each child requires consideration in intervention selection. Study findings have supported development of the FEEDS Toolkit for use in feeding services.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The FEEDS (Focus on Early Eating, Drinking and Swallowing) study focused on interventions used to improve feeding for children with neurodisability and eating, drinking and swallowing difficulties (EDSD), and the outcomes viewed as important by healthcare professionals (HPs) and parent carers. The FEEDS Toolkit was created subsequently as an intervention decision aid to be used collaboratively by parent carers and HPs. This study aimed to inform on current intervention practices and influence toolkit design by ascertaining whether specific intervention use varied by a child's main diagnosis and by specific HP role.
METHODS METHODS
FEEDS survey data were grouped by child's main diagnosis and HP role. Main diagnoses included autism spectrum disorder (ASD) n=183; Down syndrome (DS) n=69; cerebral palsy (CP) n=30). HPs included were speech and language therapists (SLT) n=131; occupational therapists (OT) n=63; physiotherapists (PT) n=57; paediatricians n=50; dieticians n=40; nurses n=32 and health visitors n=14.
RESULTS RESULTS
Most interventions were used commonly across diagnoses. However, some interventions were used more commonly with specific conditions, for example, positioning (CP 85%, DS 70%, ASD 23%, strategies/programmes aimed at changing behaviour at mealtimes (ASD 52%, CP 8%, DS 11%); visual supports (ASD 58%, CP 0%, DS 21%). HPs reported using a broad range of interventions, SLTs (mean=13.9), dieticians (12.3), OTs (12.7) and paediatricians (11.1). There was overlap between intervention use and HP role, for example, positioning (100% PT, 97% SLT, 94% OT, 73% paediatricians and 69% nurses).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Interdisciplinary working is common when managing EDSD, with all HP types using multiple interventions. A child's main diagnosis does not substantially influence intervention use, and the individual context of each child requires consideration in intervention selection. Study findings have supported development of the FEEDS Toolkit for use in feeding services.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39181695
pii: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002394
doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002394
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: DS received a research grant from Nutricia Advanced Medical Nutrition UK (Wiltshire, UK) from 2017 to 2018, honorarium payments from Nutricia Advanced Medical Nutrition UK from 2015 to 2019 and an honorarium payment from Nutricia Advanced Medical Nutrition UK in 2018. MA received fees from Nutricia Advanced Medical Nutrition UK to attend a conference in which she was presenting industry partner research work, travel and accommodation fees to attend a symposium at which she was giving an invited lecture from Nutricia Netherlands, and lecture fees from Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland). JC reports personal fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) and Ispen Pharmaceuticals (Paris, France).

Auteurs

Emogene Shaw (E)

Newcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.

Lindsay Pennington (L)

Newcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Morag Andrew (M)

Newcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Helen Taylor (H)

Newcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Jill Cadwgan (J)

Paediatric Neurosciences, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.

Diane Sellers (D)

Chailey Clinical Services, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Lewes, UK.

Christopher Morris (C)

Peninsula Childhood Disability Research Unit (PenCRU), University of Exeter Institute of Health Research, Exeter, UK.

Deborah Garland (D)

National Autistic Society, London, UK.

Jeremy Parr (J)

Newcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK jeremy.parr@ncl.ac.uk.
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH