Examining the role of personality functioning in a hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology using two years of ambulatory assessed data.
Journal
Translational psychiatry
ISSN: 2158-3188
Titre abrégé: Transl Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101562664
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Aug 2024
24 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
11
01
2024
accepted:
31
07
2024
revised:
26
07
2024
medline:
26
8
2024
pubmed:
26
8
2024
entrez:
24
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) arranges phenotypes of mental disorders based on empirical covariation, ranging from narrowly defined symptoms to higher-order spectra of psychopathology. Since the introduction of personality functioning (PF) in DSM-5 and ICD-11, several studies have identified PF as a predictor of transdiagnostic aspects of psychopathology. However, the role of PF in the HiTOP classification system has not been systematically examined. This study investigates how PF can be integrated into HiTOP, whether PF accounts for transdiagnostic variance captured in higher-order spectra, and how its predictive value for future affective well-being (AWB) and psychosocial impairment (PSI) compares to the predictive value of specific psychopathology beyond PF. To this end, we examined two years of ambulatory assessed data on psychopathology, PF, PSI, and AWB of N = 27,173 users of a mental health app. Results of bass-ackwards analyses largely aligned with the current HiTOP working model. Using bifactor modeling, aspects of PF were identified to capture most of the internalizing, thought disorder, and externalizing higher-order factor variance. In longitudinal prediction analyses employing bifactor-(S-1) modeling, PF explained 58.6% and 30.6% of variance in PSI and AWB when assessed across one year, respectively, and 33.1% and 23.2% of variance when assessed across two years. Results indicate that personality functioning may largely account for transdiagnostic variance captured in the higher-order components in HiTOP as well as longitudinal outcomes of PSI and AWB. Clinicians and their patients may benefit from assessing PF aspects such as identity problems or internal relationship models in a broad range of mental disorders. Further, incorporating measures of PF may advance research in biological psychiatry by providing empirically sound phenotypes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39181872
doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03046-z
pii: 10.1038/s41398-024-03046-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
340Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Haslam N, McGrath MJ, Viechtbauer W, Kuppens P. Dimensions over categories: a meta-analysis of taxometric research. Psychol Med. 2020;50:1418–32.
pubmed: 32493520
doi: 10.1017/S003329172000183X
Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D. A paradigm shift in psychiatric classification: the Hierarchical Taxonomy Of Psychopathology (HiTOP). World Psychiatry. 2018;17:24–5.
pubmed: 29352543
pmcid: 5775140
doi: 10.1002/wps.20478
Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D, Cicero DC, Conway CC, DeYoung CG, et al. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021;17:83–108.
pubmed: 33577350
doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-093304
Phillips G, Raskin JD. A primer for clinicians on alternatives to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2021;52:91–103.
doi: 10.1037/pro0000327
Kotov R, Jonas KG, Carpenter WT, Dretsch MN, Eaton NR, Forbes MK, et al. Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum. World Psychiatry. 2020;19:151–72.
pubmed: 32394571
pmcid: 7214958
doi: 10.1002/wps.20730
Krueger RF, Hobbs KA, Conway CC, Dick DM, Dretsch MN, Eaton NR, et al. Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum. World Psychiatry. 2021;20:171–93.
pubmed: 34002506
pmcid: 8129870
doi: 10.1002/wps.20844
Watson D, Levin‐Aspenson HF, Waszczuk MA, Conway CC, Dalgleish T, Dretsch MN, et al. Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): III. Emotional dysfunction superspectrum. World Psychiatry. 2022;21:26–54.
pubmed: 35015357
pmcid: 8751579
doi: 10.1002/wps.20943
Waszczuk MA, Eaton NR, Krueger RF, Shackman AJ, Waldman ID, Zald DH, et al. Redefining phenotypes to advance psychiatric genetics: Implications from hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology. J Abnorm Psychol. 2020;129:143–61.
pubmed: 31804095
doi: 10.1037/abn0000486
Ruggero CJ, Kotov R, Hopwood CJ, First M, Clark LA, Skodol AE, et al. Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019;87:1069–84.
pubmed: 31724426
pmcid: 6859953
doi: 10.1037/ccp0000452
Ringwald WR, Forbes MK, Wright AGC. Meta-analysis of structural evidence for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model. Psychol Med. 2023;53:533–46.
DeYoung CG, Chmielewski M, Clark LA, Condon DM, Kotov R, Krueger RF, et al. The distinction between symptoms and traits in the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). J Pers. 2022;90:20–33.
Wright AGC, Simms LJ. A metastructural model of mental disorders and pathological personality traits. Psychol Med. 2015;45:2309–19.
pubmed: 25903065
pmcid: 4498970
doi: 10.1017/S0033291715000252
Waszczuk MA, Hopwood CJ, Luft BJ, Morey LC, Perlman G, Ruggero CJ, et al. The Prognostic Utility of Personality Traits Versus Past Psychiatric Diagnoses: Predicting Future Mental Health and Functioning. Clin Psychol Sci. 2022;10:734–51.
pubmed: 35967764
doi: 10.1177/21677026211056596
Bender DS, Morey LC, Skodol AE. Toward a Model for Assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM–5, Part I: A Review of Theory and Methods. J Pers Assess. 2011;93:332–46.
pubmed: 22804672
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.583808
Bach B, Kramer U, Doering S, di Giacomo E, Hutsebaut J, Kaera A, et al. The ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: a European perspective on challenges and opportunities. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregulation. 2022;9:12.
doi: 10.1186/s40479-022-00182-0
Tyrer P, Crawford M, Mulder R, Blashfield R, Farnam A, Fossati A, et al. The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD‐11). Personal Ment Health. 2011;5:246–59.
doi: 10.1002/pmh.190
Tyrer P, Mulder R, Kim YR, Crawford MJ. The development of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: An amalgam of science, pragmatism, and politics. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:481–502.
pubmed: 30601688
doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736
Zimmermann J, Ehrenthal JC, Cierpka M, Schauenburg H, Doering S, Benecke C. Assessing the Level of Structural Integration Using Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD): Implications for DSM–5. J Pers Assess. 2012;94:522–32.
pubmed: 22808938
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.700664
Kerber A, Gewehr E, Zimmermann J, Sachser C, M Fegert J, Knaevelsrud C, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and personality functioning interact substantially in predicting depression, anxiety, and somatization. Personal Ment Health. 2023;17:246–58.
Haehner P, Sleep CE, Miller JD, Lynam DR, Hopwood CJ. The Longitudinal (Co)Development of Personality Traits and the Level of Personality Functioning After Negative Life Events. Clin Psychol Sci. 2024;12:782–801.
doi: 10.1177/21677026231197607
Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. Self-pathology, the five-factor model, and bloated specific factors: A cautionary tale. J Abnorm Psychol. 2016;125:423–34.
pubmed: 26845254
doi: 10.1037/abn0000144
Roberts BW, Luo J, Briley DA, Chow PI, Su R, Hill PL. A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychol Bull. 2017;143:117–41.
pubmed: 28054797
doi: 10.1037/bul0000088
Morey LC, McCredie MN, Bender DS, Skodol AE. Criterion A: Level of personality functioning in the alternative DSM–5 model for personality disorders. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2022;13:305–15.
doi: 10.1037/per0000551
Sharp C, Wall K. DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning: Refocusing Personality Disorder on What It Means to Be Human. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021;17:313–37.
pubmed: 33306924
doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-105402
Zimmermann J, Kerber A, Rek K, Hopwood CJ, Krueger RF. A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21:92.
pubmed: 31410586
doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z
Buer Christensen T, Eikenaes I, Hummelen B, Pedersen G, Nysæter TE, Bender DS, et al. Level of personality functioning as a predictor of psychosocial functioning—Concurrent validity of criterion A. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2020;11:79–90.
doi: 10.1037/per0000352
Weekers LC, Hutsebaut J, Rovers JMC, Kamphuis JH. Head-to-head comparison of the alternative model for personality disorders and Section II personality disorder model in terms of predicting patient outcomes 1 year later. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2023;15:101–109.
doi: 10.1037/per0000637
Widiger TA, Bach B, Chmielewski M, Clark LA, DeYoung C, Hopwood CJ, et al. Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. J Pers Assess. 2019;101:345–55.
pubmed: 29746190
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1465431
Bender DS. The P-Factor and What It Means to Be Human: Commentary on Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. J Pers Assess. 2019;101:356–9.
pubmed: 30160537
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1492928
Meehan KB, Siefert C, Sexton J, Huprich SK. Expanding the Role of Levels of Personality Functioning in Personality Disorder Taxonomy: Commentary on “Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP”. J Pers Assess. 2019;101:367–73.
pubmed: 30907636
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1551228
Garcia DJ, Waugh MH, Skadberg RM, Crittenden EB, Finn MTM, Schmidt MR, et al. Deconstructing criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2021;12:320–30.
doi: 10.1037/per0000431
Nysaeter TE, Hummelen B, Christensen TB, Eikenaes IUM, Selvik SG, Pedersen G, et al. The Incremental Utility of Criteria A and B of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders for Predicting DSM-IV/DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorders. J Pers Assess. 2023;105:111–20.
pubmed: 35285763
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2039166
Wendt LP, Jankowsky K, Schroeders U. London Personality and Mood Disorder Research Consortium, Nolte T, Fonagy P, et al. Mapping established psychopathology scales onto the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). Personal Ment Health. 2022;17:117–34.
Forbes MK. Improving hierarchical models of individual differences: An extension of Goldberg’s bass-ackward method. Psychol Methods. 2023. Available from: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/met0000546 .
Kerber A, Beintner I, Burchert S, Knaevelsrud C. Does app-based unguided self-management improve mental health literacy, patient empowerment and access to care for people with mental health impairments? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e049688.
pubmed: 34266843
pmcid: 8286775
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049688
Kerber A, Beintner I, Burchert S, Knaevelsrud C. Effects of a Self-Guided Transdiagnostic Smartphone App on Patient Empowerment and Mental Health: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2023;10:e45068.
pubmed: 37930749
pmcid: 10660244
doi: 10.2196/45068
Beintner I, Kerber A, Dominke C, Voderholzer U. Improving Mild to Moderate Depression With an App-Based Self-Guided Intervention: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023;12:e46651.
pubmed: 37878374
pmcid: 10632923
doi: 10.2196/46651
Burchert S, Kerber A, Zimmermann J, Knaevelsrud C. Screening accuracy of a 14-day smartphone ambulatory assessment of depression symptoms and mood dynamics in a general population sample: Comparison with the PHQ-9 depression screening. PLOS One. 2021;16:e0244955.
Ehrenthal JC, Dinger U, Horsch L, Komo-Lang M, Klinkerfuss M, Grande T, et al. [The OPD Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ): first results on reliability and validity]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2012;62:25–32.
pubmed: 22271173
Obbarius A, Ehrenthal JC, Fischer F, Liegl G, Obbarius N, Sarrar L, et al. Applying Item Response Theory to the OPD Structure Questionnaire: Identification of a Unidimensional Core Construct and Feasibility of Computer Adaptive Testing. J Pers Assess. 2021;103:645–58.
pubmed: 33052064
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1828435
Ehrenthal JC. Strukturdiagnostik: Strukturdiagnostik. PDP Psychodyn Psychother. 2014;13:103–14.
Ehrenthal JC, Dinger U, Schauenburg H, Horsch L, Dahlbender RW, Gierk B. Entwicklung einer Zwölf-Item-Version des OPD-Strukturfragebogens (OPD-SFK)/Development of a 12-item version of the OPD-Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQS). Z Für Psychosom Med Psychother. 2015;61:262–74.
Ehrenthal JC, Kruse J, Schmalbach B, Dinger U, Werner S, Schauenburg H, et al. Measuring personality functioning with the 12-item version of the OPD-Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQS): reliability, factor structure, validity, and measurement invariance in the general population. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1248992.
pubmed: 37780157
pmcid: 10536238
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1248992
Ohse L, Zimmermann J, Kerber A, Kampe L, Mohr J, Kendlbacher J. et al. Reliability, structure, and validity of module I (personality functioning) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the alternative DSM–5 model for personality disorders (SCID-5-AMPD-I). Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2023;14:287–299.
doi: 10.1037/per0000576
Zettl M, Taubner S, Hutsebaut J, Volkert J. Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Semistrukturierten Interviews zur Erfassung der DSM-5 Persönlichkeitsfunktionen (STiP-5.1). PPmP Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2019;69:499–504.
doi: 10.1055/a-1010-6887
Dinger U, Schauenburg H, Hörz S, Rentrop M, Komo-Lang M, Klinkerfuß M, et al. Self-Report and Observer Ratings of Personality Functioning: A Study of the OPD System. J Pers Assess. 2014;96:220–5.
pubmed: 24003849
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.828065
Jauk E, Ehrenthal JC. Self-Reported Levels of Personality Functioning from the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD) System and Emotional Intelligence Likely Assess the Same Latent Construct. J Pers Assess. 2021;103:365–79.
pubmed: 32631173
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1775089
Zettl M, Volkert J, Vögele C, Herpertz SC, Kubera KM, Taubner S. Mentalization and criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders: Results from a clinical and nonclinical sample. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2020;11:191–201.
doi: 10.1037/per0000356
Hamaker EL. The Curious Case of the Cross-Sectional Correlation. Multivar Behav Res. 2023;4;1–12.
McDonald RP. Test theory: a unified treatment. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1999. 485 p.
Ro E, Clark LA. Psychosocial functioning in the context of diagnosis: Assessment and theoretical issues. Psychol Assess. 2009;21:313–24.
pubmed: 19719344
doi: 10.1037/a0016611
Forbes MK, Sunderland M, Rapee RM, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Carragher N, et al. A Detailed Hierarchical Model of Psychopathology: From Individual Symptoms up to the General Factor of Psychopathology. Clin Psychol Sci. 2021;9:139–68.
pubmed: 33758691
pmcid: 7983870
doi: 10.1177/2167702620954799
Huang M, Müller CL, Gaynanova I. latentcor: An R Package for estimating latent correlations from mixed data types. ArXiv. 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.09180 .
Sass DA, Schmitt TA. A Comparative Investigation of Rotation Criteria Within Exploratory Factor Analysis. Multivar Behav Res. 2010;45:73–103.
doi: 10.1080/00273170903504810
Eid M. Multi-Faceted Constructs in Abnormal Psychology: Implications of the Bifactor S - 1 Model for Individual Clinical Assessment. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020;48:895–900.
pubmed: 32086729
pmcid: 7305063
doi: 10.1007/s10802-020-00624-9
Heinrich M, Geiser C, Zagorscak P, Burns GL, Bohn J, Becker SP. et al. On the Meaning of the “P Factor” in Symmetrical Bifactor Models of Psychopathology: Recommendations for Future Research From the Bifactor-(S−1) Perspective. Assessment. 2023;30:487–507.
pubmed: 34861784
doi: 10.1177/10731911211060298
Shi D, Maydeu-Olivares A, DiStefano C. The Relationship Between the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual and Model Misspecification in Factor Analysis Models. Multivar Behav Res. 2018;53:676–94.
doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1476221
Ximénez C, Maydeu-Olivares A, Shi D, Revuelta J. Assessing Cutoff Values of SEM Fit Indices: Advantages of the Unbiased SRMR Index and Its Cutoff Criterion Based on Communality. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2022;29:368–80.
doi: 10.1080/10705511.2021.1992596
Heinrich M, Zagorscak P, Eid M, Knaevelsrud C. Giving G a Meaning: An Application of the Bifactor-(S-1) Approach to Realize a More Symptom-Oriented Modeling of the Beck Depression Inventory–II. Assessment. 2020;27:1429–47.
pubmed: 30293444
doi: 10.1177/1073191118803738
Faure K, Forbes MK. Clarifying the Placement of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in the Empirical Structure of Psychopathology. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2021;43:671–85.
doi: 10.1007/s10862-021-09868-1
Iob E, Kirschbaum C, Steptoe A. Persistent depressive symptoms, HPA-axis hyperactivity, and inflammation: the role of cognitive-affective and somatic symptoms. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:1130–40.
pubmed: 31435001
doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0501-6
Kupper N, Widdershoven JW, Pedersen SS. Cognitive/affective and somatic/affective symptom dimensions of depression are associated with current and future inflammation in heart failure patients. J Affect Disord. 2012;136:567–76.
pubmed: 22134045
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.029
Roest AM, Thombs BD, Grace SL, Stewart DE, Abbey SE, De Jonge P. Somatic/affective symptoms, but not cognitive/affective symptoms, of depression after acute coronary syndrome are associated with 12-month all-cause mortality. J Affect Disord. 2011;131:158–63.
pubmed: 21159385
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.11.018
Forbush KT, Chen Y, Chen PY, Bohrer BK, Hagan KE, Chapa DAN. et al. Integrating “Lumpers” Versus “Splitters” Perspectives: Toward a Hierarchical Dimensional Taxonomy of Eating Disorders From Clinician Ratings. Clin Psychol Sci. 2023;12:625–643.
doi: 10.1177/21677026231186803
Latzman RD, Tobin KE, Palumbo IM, Conway CC, Lilienfeld SO, Patrick CJ, et al. Locating psychopathy within the domain space of personality pathology. Personal Individ Differ. 2020;164:110124.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110124
Forbes MK, Baillie AJ, Batterham P, Calear A, Kotov R, Krueger R, et al. Reconstructing Psychopathology: A data-driven reorganization of the symptoms in DSM-5. 2023. Available from: https://osf.io/7um9a .
Watts AL, Poore HE, Waldman ID. Riskier Tests of the Validity of the Bifactor Model of Psychopathology. Clin Psychol Sci. 2019;7:1285–303.
doi: 10.1177/2167702619855035
Watts AL, Greene AL, Bonifay W, Fried EI. A critical evaluation of the p-factor literature. Nat Rev Psychol. 2024;3:108–122.
doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00260-2
Bach B, Simonsen S. How does level of personality functioning inform clinical management and treatment? Implications for ICD-11 classification of personality disorder severity. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021;34:54–63.
pubmed: 33252430
doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000658
Bach B, Tracy M. Clinical utility of the alternative model of personality disorders: A 10th year anniversary review. Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2022;13:369–79.
doi: 10.1037/per0000527
Ehrenthal JC, Benecke C. Tailored Treatment Planning for Individuals With Personality Disorders. In: Case Formulation for Personality Disorders. Elsevier; 2019. p. 291–314. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813521-1.00015-1 .
Hutsebaut J, Feenstra DJ, Kamphuis JH. Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire for the Assessment of the DSM–5 level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-BF). Personal Disord Theory Res Treat. 2016;7:192–7.
doi: 10.1037/per0000159
Bach B, Kerber A, Aluja A, Bastiaens T, Keeley JW, Claes L. et al. International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1. Psychopathology. 2020;53:179–188.
pubmed: 32369820
doi: 10.1159/000507589
Kerber A, Macina C, Ohse L, Kampe L, Knaevelsrud C, Wrege J, et al. Determining essential dimensions for the clinical approximation of personality dysfunction severity - a multimethod study. Under review. Available from: https://osf.io/rg5pf
Huber D, Zimmermann J, Klug G. Change in personality functioning during psychotherapy for depression predicts long-term outcome. Psychoanal Psychol. 2017;34:434–45.
doi: 10.1037/pap0000129
Kerber A, Schaeuffele C, Krieger T, Urech A, Riper H, Berger T, et al. Differential Effects of Psychological Interventions in Online and Face-to-Face Settings on DSM-5 and ICD-11 Maladaptive Trait Domains: An Exploratory Pilot Study. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:648367.
pubmed: 34194347
pmcid: 8236509
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.648367
Herpertz SC, Bertsch K, Jeung H. Neurobiology of Criterion A: self and interpersonal personality functioning. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018;21:23–7.
pubmed: 28946053
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.032
Kim Y, Saunders GRB, Giannelis A, Willoughby EA, DeYoung CG, Lee JJ. Genetic and neural bases of the neuroticism general factor. Biol Psychol. 2023;184:108692.
pubmed: 37783279
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108692
McEwen BS. Allostasis and the Epigenetics of Brain and Body Health Over the Life Course: The Brain on Stress. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:551.
pubmed: 28445556
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0270
Ringwald WR, Hallquist MN, Dombrovski AY, Wright AGC. Personality (Dys)Function and General Instability. Clin Psychol Sci. 2023;11(1): 106-120.
Wright AGC, Ringwald W, Zimmermann J Measuring Multidimensional Hierarchies of Psychopathology in Daily Life. 2024. Available from: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/h8npk .
Del Giudice M, Haltigan JD. An integrative evolutionary framework for psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2023;35:1–11.
pubmed: 34365992
doi: 10.1017/S0954579421000870
DeYoung CG, Kotov R, Krueger RF, Cicero DC, Conway CC, Eaton NR, et al. Answering Questions About the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): Analogies to Whales and Sharks Miss the Boat. Clin Psychol Sci. 2022;10(2): 279-284
Haeffel GJ, Jeronimus BF, Kaiser BN, Weaver LJ, Soyster PD, Fisher AJ, et al. Folk Classification and Factor Rotations: Whales, Sharks, and the Problems With the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). Clin Psychol Sci. 2022;10:259–78.
pubmed: 35425668
doi: 10.1177/21677026211002500
Gonzalez O, MacKinnon DP, Muniz FB. Extrinsic Convergent Validity Evidence to Prevent Jingle and Jangle Fallacies. Multivar Behav Res. 2021;56:3–19.
doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1707061
Watts AL, Greene AL, Ringwald W, Forbes MK, Brandes CM, Levin-Aspenson HF, et al. Factor Analysis in Personality Disorders Research: Modern Issues and Illustrations of Practical Recommendations. Pers. Disord.: Theory Res. Treat. 2023;14(1): 105.