Predicting social experience from dyadic interaction dynamics: the BallGame, a novel paradigm to study social engagement.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 08 2024
24 08 2024
Historique:
received:
31
01
2024
accepted:
07
08
2024
medline:
26
8
2024
pubmed:
26
8
2024
entrez:
24
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Theories of embodied cognition suggest that a shared environment and ongoing sensorimotor interaction are central for interpersonal learning and engagement. To investigate the embodied, distributed and hence dynamically unfolding nature of social cognitive capacities, we present a novel laboratory-based coordination task: the BallGame. Our paradigm requires continuous sensing and acting between two players who jointly steer a virtual ball around obstacles towards as many targets as possible. By analysing highly resolved measures of movement coordination and gaming behaviour, game-concurrent experience ratings, semi-structured interviews, and personality questionnaires, we reveal contributions from different levels of observation on social experience. In particular, successful coordination (number of targets collected) and intermittent periods of high versus low movement coordination (variability of relation) emerged as prominent predictors of social experience. Importantly, having the same (but incomplete) view on the game environment strengthened interpersonal coordination, whereas complementary views enhanced engagement and tended to generate more complex interactive behaviour. Overall, we find evidence for a critical balance between similarity and synchrony on the one hand, and variability and difference on the other, for successful engagement in social interactions. Finally, following participant reports, we highlight how interpersonal experience emerges from specific histories of coordination that are closely related to the interaction context in both space and time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39181889
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69678-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-69678-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19666Subventions
Organisme : EU FET Proactive Horizon 2020
ID : H2020-641321
Organisme : EU FET Proactive Horizon 2020
ID : H2020-641321
Organisme : EU FET Proactive Horizon 2020
ID : H2020-641321
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SFB936-178316478-A3
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SFB936-178316478-A3
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SFB936-178316478-A3
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SFB936-178316478-A3
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SFB936-178316478-A3
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience (MIT Press, 1991). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001 .
doi: 10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001
Clark, A. Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again (MIT Press, 1997). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1552.001.0001 .
doi: 10.7551/mitpress/1552.001.0001
Menary, R. Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenom. Cogn. Sci. 9, 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9187-6 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s11097-010-9187-6
Engel, A. K., Maye, A., Kurthen, M. & König, P. Where’s the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science. Trends. Cogn. Sci. 17, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.006 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.006
pubmed: 23608361
Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J. & Schmidt, R. C. Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Top. Cognitive Sci. 1, 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x
Lübbert, A. et al. Socializing sensorimotor contingencies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 15, 624610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.624610 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.624610
pubmed: 34602990
pmcid: 8480310
Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J. & Garnero, L. Interbrain synchronization during social interaction. PLoS One 5, e12166. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012166 (2010).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012166
pubmed: 20808907
pmcid: 2923151
Zhou, G., Bourguignon, M., Parkkonen, L. & Hari, R. Neural signatures of hand kinematics in leaders vs. followers: A dual-MEG study. Neuroimage 125, 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.002 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.002
pubmed: 26546864
Llobera, J. et al. The subjective sensation of synchrony: An experimental study. PLoS One 11, e0147008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147008 (2016).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147008
pubmed: 26870943
pmcid: 4752214
Jakubowski, K. et al. Multimodal perception of interpersonal synchrony: Evidence from global and continuous ratings of improvised musical duo performances. Psychomusicol. Music Mind Brain 30(4), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000264 (2020).
doi: 10.1037/pmu0000264
Ramseyer, F. & Tschacher, W. Movement coordination in psychotherapy: Synchrony of hand movements is associated with session outcome. A single-case study. Nonlinear Dyn. Psychol. Life Sci. 20(2), 145–166 (2016).
Feniger-Schaal, R., Hart, Y., Lotan, N., Koren-Karie, N. & Noy, L. The body speaks: Using the mirror game to link attachment and non-verbal behavior. Front. Psychol. 9, 1560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01560 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01560
pubmed: 30190699
pmcid: 6115809
Vesper, C., Schmitz, L., Safra, L., Sebanz, N. & Knoblich, G. The role of shared visual information for joint action coordination. Cognition 153, 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.002 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.002
pubmed: 27183398
pmcid: 4918098
Zhao, K. & Smillie, L. D. The role of interpersonal traits in social decision making: Exploring sources of behavioral heterogeneity in economic games. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 19(3), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314553709 (2015).
doi: 10.1177/1088868314553709
pubmed: 25552474
Cheng, M., Kato, M. & Tseng, C. H. Gender and autistic traits modulate implicit motor synchrony. PLoS One 12(9), e0184083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184083 (2017).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184083
pubmed: 28873419
pmcid: 5584984
Curioni, A., Minio-Paluello, I., Sacheli, L. M., Candidi, M. & Aglioti, S. M. Autistic traits affect interpersonal motor coordination by modulating strategic use of role-based behavior. Mol. Autism. 8, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-017-0141-0 (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s13229-017-0141-0
pubmed: 28616126
pmcid: 5466762
O’Regan, J. K. & Noë, A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 24(5), 883–917. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01000115 (2001).
doi: 10.1017/s0140525x01000115
De Jaegher, H. & Di Paolo, E. Participatory sense-making. Phenom. Cogn. Sci. 6, 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9 (2007).
doi: 10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
Konvalinka, I. & Roepstorff, A. The two-brain approach: How can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction?. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00215 (2012).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00215
pubmed: 22837744
pmcid: 3402900
Clark, A. Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action and the Embodied Mind (Oxford University Press, 2016). https://doi.org/10.30965/9783957437907_015 .
doi: 10.30965/9783957437907_015
Durt, C., Fuchs, T. & Tewes, C. Embodiment, enaction and culture: Investigating the constitution of the shared world (MIT Press, 2017). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035552.001.0001 .
doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262035552.001.0001
Auvray, M. & Rohde, M. Perceptual crossing: The simplest online paradigm. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00181 (2012).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00181
pubmed: 22723776
pmcid: 3377933
Froese, T., Iizuka, H. & Ikegami, T. Embodied social interaction constitutes social cognition in pairs of humans: A minimalist virtual reality experiment. Sci. Rep. 4, 3672. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03672 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/srep03672
pubmed: 24419102
pmcid: 3890942
Borkenau, P. & Ostendorf, F. NEO-FFI: NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar nach Costa und McCrae, Manual 2nd edn. (Hogrefe, 2008).
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Matin, J. & Clubley, E. The AUTISM-SPECTRUM QUotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J. Autism. Dev. Disord. 31, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005653411471 (2001).
doi: 10.1023/a:1005653411471
pubmed: 11439754
Paulus, C. The Saarbrueck Personality Questionnaire on Empathy: Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (2009). https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.9249
Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
pubmed: 18352969
Kuckartz, U. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung (Beltz Juventa, 2012).
Moulder, R. G., Boker, S. M., Ramseyer, F. & Tschacher, W. Determining synchrony between behavioral time series: An application of surrogate data generation for establishing falsifiable null-hypotheses. Psychol. Methods 23, 757–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000172 (2018).
doi: 10.1037/met0000172
pubmed: 29595296
pmcid: 6163103
Cohen, M. X. Analyzing neural time series data: Theory and practice (MIT Press, 2014). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9609.001.0001 .
doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9609.001.0001
Quian Quiroga, R. & Panzeri, S. Extracting information from neuronal populations: information theory and decoding approaches. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10(3), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2578 (2009).
doi: 10.1038/nrn2578
pubmed: 19229240
Nolte, G. et al. Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(23), 234101. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.234101 (2008).
doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.100.234101
pubmed: 18643502
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 (2015).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 (2017).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
De Haan-Rietdijk, S., Kuppens, P. & Hamaker, E. L. What’s in a day? A guide to decomposing the variance in intensive longitudinal data. Front. Psychol. 7, 891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00891 (2016).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00891
pubmed: 27378986
pmcid: 4906027
Bakdash, J.Z. & Marusich, L.R. rmcorr: Repeated measures correlation. R package version 0.4.3. (2021). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rmcorr
Bakdash, J. Z. & Marusich, L. R. Repeated measures correlation. Front. Psychol. 8, 456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00456 (2017).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00456
pubmed: 28439244
pmcid: 5383908
Friedrich, S., Konietschke, F. & Pauly, M. MANOVA.RM: Resampling-based analysis of multivariate data and repeated measures designs. R package version 0.5.1. (2021). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MANOVA.RM
Friedrich, S. & Pauly, M. MATS: Inference for potentially singular and heteroscedastic MANOVA. J. Multivar. Anal. 165, 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2017.12.008 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2017.12.008
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x (1995).
doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Haynes, W. Benjamini-Hochberg method. In Encyclopedia of Systems Biology (eds Dubitzky, W. et al.) (Springer, 2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1215 .
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1215
Proksch, S., Reeves, M., Spivey, M. & Balasubramaniam, R. Coordination dynamics of multi-agent interaction in a musical ensemble. Sci. Rep. 12, 421. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04463-6 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04463-6
pubmed: 35013620
pmcid: 8748883
Kendon, A. Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica 32, 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(70)90094-6 (1970).
doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90094-6
De Jaegher, H. Social interaction rhythm and participatory sense-making: an embodied, interactional approach to social understanding, with some implications for autism [unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Sussex (2007).
Bowlby, J. Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. Am. J. Orthopsychiatr. 52, 664–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x (1982).
doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x
Stephens, D. W., Brown, J. S. & Ydenberg, R. C. Foraging: Behavior and ecology (University of Chicago Press, 2008).
Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M. & Jones, M. N. Foraging in semantic fields: How we search through memory. Top. Cognit. Sci. 7(3), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12151 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/tops.12151
Hart, Y. et al. Creative foraging: An experimental paradigm for studying exploration and discovery. PLOS ONE 12(8), e0182133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182133 (2017).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182133
pubmed: 28767668
pmcid: 5540595
McCullough, S. E. Mechanical intuitions: The origins and growth of mountain biking [unpublished doctoral thesis] (University of California, 2013).
Tognoli, E. & Kelso, J. The metastable brain. Neuron 81, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.022 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.022
pubmed: 24411730
pmcid: 3997258
Bjørndahl, J. S., Fusaroli, R., Østergaard, S. & Tylén, K. Agreeing is not enough: The constructive role of miscommunication. Interact. Stud. Soc. Behav. Commun. Biol. Artif. Syst. 16(3), 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.3.07fus (2015).
doi: 10.1075/is.16.3.07fus
Riley, M. A., Richardson, M., Shockley, K. & Ramenzoni, V. C. Interpersonal synergies. Front. Psychol. 2, 7933. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00038 (2011).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00038
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H. & Knoblich, G. Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cognitive Sci. 10, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009
Maye, A. & Engel, A. K. Time scales of sensorimotor contingencies. In Advances in Brain Inspired Cognitive Systems (eds Zhang, H. et al.) 240–249 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31561-9_27 .
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31561-9_27
Silva, P., Garganta, J., Araújo, D., Davids, K. & Aguiar, P. Shared knowledge or shared affordances? Insights from an ecological dynamics approach to team coordination in sports. Sports Med. 43, 765–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0070-9 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0070-9
pubmed: 23794235
Thorne, N., Honisch, J. J., Kondo, T., Nasuto, S. & Hayashi, Y. Temporal structure in haptic signalling under a cooperative task. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00372 (2019).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00372
pubmed: 31827428
pmcid: 6890600
Krabben, K., Orth, D. & van der Kamp, J. Combat as an interpersonal synergy: An ecological dynamics approach to combat sports. Sports Med. 49(12), 1825–1836 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01173-y
pubmed: 31502140
pmcid: 6851042
Kimmel, M. & Rogler, C. R. Affordances in interaction: The case of Aikido. Ecol. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2017.1409589.5 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/10407413.2017.1409589.5
Jones, M. R. Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychol. Rev. 83, 323–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.83.5.323 (1976).
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.83.5.323
pubmed: 794904
Large, E. W. & Jones, M. R. The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychol. Rev. 106(1), 119–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.119 (1999).
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.119
Lefebvre, H. Rhythmanalysis: Space time and everyday life (Continuum, 2004). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547385 .
doi: 10.5040/9781472547385
Wöllner, C. & London, J. Performing time: Synchrony and temporal flow in music and dance (Oxford University Press, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896254.001.0001 .
doi: 10.1093/oso/9780192896254.001.0001
Hall, R. & Stevens, R. Interaction Analysis approach to knowledge in use. In Knowledge and Interaction. A Synthetic Agenda for the Learning Sciences (eds diSessa, A. A. et al.) 72–108 (Routledge, 2015). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757360 .
doi: 10.4324/9781315757360
Kalaydjian, J., Laroche, J., Noy, L. & Bachrach, A. A distributed model of collective creativity in free play. Front. Educ. 7, 902251. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.902251 (2022).
doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.902251
Romero, V., Kallen, R., Riley, M. A. & Richardson, M. J. Can discrete joint action be synergistic? Studying the stabilization of interpersonal hand coordination. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 41(5), 1223. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000083 (2015).
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000083
Noy, L., Levit-Binun, N. & Golland, Y. Being in the zone: Physiological markers of togetherness in joint improvisation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00187 (2015).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00187
pubmed: 25999832
pmcid: 4419713
Kimmel, M., Hristova, D. & Kussmaul, K. Sources of embodied creativity: Interactivity and ideation in contact improvisation. Behav. Sci. 8, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8060052 (2018).
doi: 10.3390/bs8060052
pubmed: 29882858
pmcid: 6027199
Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A. & Frith, C. D. Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63, 2220–2230. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.497843 (2010).
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.497843
Dumas, G., de Guzman, G. C., Tognoli, E. & Kelso, J. A. S. The human dynamic clamp as a paradigm for social interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3726–3734. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407486111 (2014).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407486111
Varlet, M., Nozaradan, S., Nijhuis, P. & Keller, P. E. Neural tracking and integration of “self” and “other” in improvised interpersonal coordination. NeuroImage 206, 116303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116303 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116303
pubmed: 31654761