Exploring inclusion in UK agricultural robotics development: who, how, and why?

Agricultural robotics Emerging technology ethics Participation Responsible innovation Stakeholder inclusion

Journal

Agriculture and human values
ISSN: 0889-048X
Titre abrégé: Agric Human Values
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100973331

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
accepted: 14 02 2024
medline: 26 8 2024
pubmed: 26 8 2024
entrez: 26 8 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The global agricultural sector faces a significant number of challenges for a sustainable future, and one of the tools proposed to address these challenges is the use of automation in agriculture. In particular, robotic systems for agricultural tasks are being designed, tested, and increasingly commercialised in many countries. Much touted as an environmentally beneficial technology with the ability to improve data management and reduce the use of chemical inputs while improving yields and addressing labour shortages, agricultural robotics also presents a number of potential ethical challenges - including rural unemployment, the amplification of economic and digital inequalities, and entrenching unsustainable farming practices. As such, development is not uncontroversial, and there have been calls for a responsible approach to their innovation that integrates more substantive inclusion into development processes. This study investigates current approaches to participation and inclusion amongst United Kingdom (UK) agricultural robotics developers. Through semi-structured interviews with key members of the UK agricultural robotics sector, we analyse the stakeholder engagement currently integrated into development processes. We explore who is included, how inclusion is done, and what the inclusion is done for. We reflect on how these findings align with the current literature on stakeholder inclusion in agricultural technology development, and suggest what they could mean for the development of more substantive responsible innovation in agricultural robotics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39183776
doi: 10.1007/s10460-024-10555-6
pii: 10555
pmc: PMC11341617
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1257-1275

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Auteurs

Kirsten Ayris (K)

School of Agriculture, Policy, and Development, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UR UK.

Anna Jackman (A)

Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UR UK.

Alice Mauchline (A)

School of Agriculture, Policy, and Development, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UR UK.

David Christian Rose (DC)

Royal Agricultural University, Stroud Rd, Cirencester, GL7 6JS UK.

Classifications MeSH