Melanoma-specific survival of patients with uveal melanoma and liver metastases diagnosed between 2005 and 2021.
chemotherapy
immunotherapy
melanoma
metastasis
uvea melanoma
Journal
Therapeutic advances in medical oncology
ISSN: 1758-8340
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Med Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101510808
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
08
05
2024
accepted:
18
07
2024
medline:
26
8
2024
pubmed:
26
8
2024
entrez:
26
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Uveal melanoma is the most common malignant tumor of the eye in adults. About half of the patients develop distant metastases, most commonly liver metastases (>90%). These are associated with poorer overall survival compared to patients with extrahepatic metastases. In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma between January 2005 and December 2021 and treated at the Center for Dermato-oncology at the University of Tübingen, were included. The total cohort was divided into two groups. Group 1, in which the first diagnosis of metastasis was between 2005 and 2015 and group 2 with first metastasis between 2016 and 2021. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, test for differences was performed by the log-rank test. A total of 167 patients were included in the study. Since more than 90% of patients had developed liver metastases as their first site of metastasis, we focused our analysis on patients with liver metastases. Median MSS was 28 months (95% confidence interval (CI) (22.8-33.2 months)) in patients receiving first-line liver-directed therapy ( This analysis revealed that MSS has improved significantly in recent years. In our analysis, first-line liver-directed therapy was associated with improved survival compared to first-line systemic therapy. Further studies are urgently needed, for example, to investigate the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition or tebentafusp with liver-specific procedures from the outset.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Uveal melanoma is the most common malignant tumor of the eye in adults. About half of the patients develop distant metastases, most commonly liver metastases (>90%). These are associated with poorer overall survival compared to patients with extrahepatic metastases.
Patients and methods
UNASSIGNED
In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma between January 2005 and December 2021 and treated at the Center for Dermato-oncology at the University of Tübingen, were included. The total cohort was divided into two groups. Group 1, in which the first diagnosis of metastasis was between 2005 and 2015 and group 2 with first metastasis between 2016 and 2021. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, test for differences was performed by the log-rank test.
Results
UNASSIGNED
A total of 167 patients were included in the study. Since more than 90% of patients had developed liver metastases as their first site of metastasis, we focused our analysis on patients with liver metastases. Median MSS was 28 months (95% confidence interval (CI) (22.8-33.2 months)) in patients receiving first-line liver-directed therapy (
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
This analysis revealed that MSS has improved significantly in recent years. In our analysis, first-line liver-directed therapy was associated with improved survival compared to first-line systemic therapy. Further studies are urgently needed, for example, to investigate the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition or tebentafusp with liver-specific procedures from the outset.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39184023
doi: 10.1177/17588359241273020
pii: 10.1177_17588359241273020
pmc: PMC11342429
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
17588359241273020Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), 2024.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
T.A. received institutional grants from SkylineDx, Neracare, Novartis, Sanofi, and consulting fees from Novartis, Neracare, BMS, CeCaVa, and Chemosat, outside the submitted work. U.L. received grants from MSD, honoraria as a speaker for MSD, Novartis, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Roche, Almirall Hermal, and travel support from Sun Pharma, Pierre-Fabre, outside the submitted work. A.F. served as a consultant to Novartis, MSD, BMS, Pierre-Fabre and Immunocore; received travel support from Novartis, BMS, Pierre-Fabre, and received speaker fees from Novartis, Delcath, BMS and MSD and reports institutional research grants from BMS Stiftung Immunonkologie, outside the submitted work. L.F. reports grants or contracts from Hookipa Pharma, SAKK/Immunophotonics, DFG Grant (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft), Philogen, and Mundipharma; consulting fees from Philogen, Sanofi, Novartis, BMS; participation on Data Safety Board University of Basel, all outside the submitted work. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.