Matters We Metric Vs. Metrics that Matter.

geriatric fracture hospital metrics metrics patient-centered care quality-based reimbursement

Journal

Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation
ISSN: 2151-4585
Titre abrégé: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101558150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 04 07 2024
accepted: 04 08 2024
medline: 26 8 2024
pubmed: 26 8 2024
entrez: 26 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Geriatric fracture is a pressing global health issue, marked by elevated mortality and morbidity rates and escalating health care costs. The evolving health care system from fee-for-service to quality-based reimbursement has led to externally driven reward and reimbursement systems that may not account for the complexity of caring for older adults with fracture. The aim of this review is to highlight the need for a shift towards meaningful metrics that impact geriatric fracture care and to issue a call to action for all medical societies to advocate for national reimbursement and ranking systems that focus on metrics that truly matter. Traditional metrics, while easier to capture, may not necessarily represent high quality care and may even have unintentional adverse consequences. For example, the focus on reducing length of stay may lead to older patients being discharged too early, without adequately addressing pain, constipation, or delirium. In addition, a focus on mortality may miss the opportunity to deliver compassionate end-of-life care. Existing geriatric fracture care metrics have expanded beyond traditional metrics to include assessment by geriatricians, fracture prevention, and delirium assessments. However, there is a need to further consider and develop patient-focused metrics. The Age-Friendly Health Initiative (4 Ms), which includes Mobility, Medication, Mentation, and what Matters is an evidence-based framework for assessing and acting on critical issues in the care of older adults. Additional metrics that should be considered include an assessment of nutrition and secondary fracture prevention. In the realm of geriatric fracture care, the metrics currently employed often revolve around adherence to established guidelines and are heavily influenced by financial considerations. It is crucial to shift the paradigm towards metrics that truly matter for geriatric fracture patients, recognizing the multifaceted nature of their care and the profound impact these fractures have on their lives.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39184133
doi: 10.1177/21514593241277737
pii: 10.1177_21514593241277737
pmc: PMC11344255
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

21514593241277737

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Naoko Onizuka (N)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
TRIA Orthopedics, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, Saint Louis Park, MN, USA.
International Geriatric Fracture Society Research Fellowship, Apopka, FL, USA.

Liron Sinvani (L)

Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Department of Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.

Carmen Quatman (C)

International Geriatric Fracture Society Research Fellowship, Apopka, FL, USA.
Division of Trauma, Department of Orthopaedics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking in Health Services and Implementation Science Research (CATALYST), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Classifications MeSH