Are the dark personalities sincere? Connections between the Dark Triad and the Big Three.

Eysenck PEN model dark personality traits sincerity social desirability

Journal

Current issues in personality psychology
ISSN: 2353-561X
Titre abrégé: Curr Issues Personal Psychol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101694413

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 20 01 2023
revised: 25 04 2023
accepted: 19 07 2023
medline: 26 8 2024
pubmed: 26 8 2024
entrez: 26 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There are different theories and models of personality. In the antisocial area, the model used is the Dark Triad, a model of personality composed of the traits of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism. The links between the Dark Triad and other general models have been widely studied; however, there is little research connecting it with the traditional, but still used, model of personality described by Eysenck (psychoticism, extraversion, and neuroticism). Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the connections between the Dark Triad of personality and Eysenck's personality model. Additionally, we interpret the connections between the sincerity scale of Eysenck's model and the Dark Triad. Our final sample was composed of 2385 participants who completed different personality questionnaires measuring the Dark Triad and Eysenck's model. Bivariate analyses and structural equation modelling were performed. Narcissism and Machiavellianism have positive connections with neuroticism and extraversion, whereas psychopathy is positively associated with psychoticism and negatively associated with extraversion. All the Dark Triad traits, mainly Machiavellianism, show the strongest connections with sincerity. Considering the deceptive and manipulative nature of the Dark Triad, these results would imply that these traits could be mismeasured in some contexts. However, in research conditions those people who score higher on the Dark Tetrad traits do not hide behaviours that tend to be socially undesirable, implying some degree of honesty in their answers. Further efforts to develop more objective measures, such as implicit, indirect, task-based, or forced-choice measures, should be considered.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
There are different theories and models of personality. In the antisocial area, the model used is the Dark Triad, a model of personality composed of the traits of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism. The links between the Dark Triad and other general models have been widely studied; however, there is little research connecting it with the traditional, but still used, model of personality described by Eysenck (psychoticism, extraversion, and neuroticism). Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the connections between the Dark Triad of personality and Eysenck's personality model. Additionally, we interpret the connections between the sincerity scale of Eysenck's model and the Dark Triad.
PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE METHODS
Our final sample was composed of 2385 participants who completed different personality questionnaires measuring the Dark Triad and Eysenck's model. Bivariate analyses and structural equation modelling were performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Narcissism and Machiavellianism have positive connections with neuroticism and extraversion, whereas psychopathy is positively associated with psychoticism and negatively associated with extraversion. All the Dark Triad traits, mainly Machiavellianism, show the strongest connections with sincerity.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Considering the deceptive and manipulative nature of the Dark Triad, these results would imply that these traits could be mismeasured in some contexts. However, in research conditions those people who score higher on the Dark Tetrad traits do not hide behaviours that tend to be socially undesirable, implying some degree of honesty in their answers. Further efforts to develop more objective measures, such as implicit, indirect, task-based, or forced-choice measures, should be considered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39184903
doi: 10.5114/cipp/169801
pii: 169801
pmc: PMC11339843
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

178-184

Informations de copyright

Copyright © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Manuel Galán (M)

Forensic Psychology Unit, Center for Applied Psychology, Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.
Psychology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Murcia, Spain.

David Pineda (D)

Forensic Psychology Unit, Center for Applied Psychology, Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.

Pilar Rico-Bordera (P)

Forensic Psychology Unit, Center for Applied Psychology, Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.

José A Piqueras (JA)

Forensic Psychology Unit, Center for Applied Psychology, Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.

Ana Martínez-Martínez (A)

Forensic Psychology Unit, Center for Applied Psychology, Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.

Classifications MeSH