Identifying and prioritizing recommendations to optimize transitions across the care journey for hip fractures: Results from a mixed-methods concept mapping study.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 01 04 2024
accepted: 05 07 2024
medline: 27 8 2024
pubmed: 26 8 2024
entrez: 26 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Individuals who experience a hip fracture have numerous care transitions. Improving the transition process is important for ensuring quality care; however, little is known about the priorities of different key interest groups. Our aim was to gather recommendations from these groups regarding care transitions for hip fracture. We conducted a concept mapping study, inviting persons with lived experience (PWLE) who had a hip fracture, care partners, healthcare providers, and decision-makers to share their thoughts about 'what is needed to improve care transitions for hip fracture'. Individuals were subsequently asked to sort the generated statements into conceptual piles, and then rate by importance and priority using a five-point scale. Participants decided on the final map, rearranged statements, and assigned a name to each conceptual cluster. A total of 35 participants took part in this concept mapping study, with some individuals participating in multiple steps. Participants included 22 healthcare providers, 7 care partners, 4 decision-makers, and 2 PWLE. The final map selected by participants was an 8-cluster map, with the following cluster labels: (1) access to inpatient services and supports across the care continuum (13 statements); (2) informed and collaborative discharge planning (13 statements); (3) access to transitional and outpatient services (3 statements); (4) communication, education and knowledge acquisition (9 statements); (5) support for care partners (2 statements); (6) person-centred care (13 statements); (7) physical, social, and cognitive activities and supports (13 statements); and (8) provider knowledge, skills, roles and behaviours (8 statements). Our study findings highlight the importance of person-centred care, with active involvement of PWLE and their care partners throughout the care journey. Many participant statements included specific ideas related to continuity of care, and clinical knowledge and skills. This study provides insights for future interventions and quality improvement initiatives for enhancing transitions in care among hip fracture populations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Individuals who experience a hip fracture have numerous care transitions. Improving the transition process is important for ensuring quality care; however, little is known about the priorities of different key interest groups. Our aim was to gather recommendations from these groups regarding care transitions for hip fracture.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a concept mapping study, inviting persons with lived experience (PWLE) who had a hip fracture, care partners, healthcare providers, and decision-makers to share their thoughts about 'what is needed to improve care transitions for hip fracture'. Individuals were subsequently asked to sort the generated statements into conceptual piles, and then rate by importance and priority using a five-point scale. Participants decided on the final map, rearranged statements, and assigned a name to each conceptual cluster.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 35 participants took part in this concept mapping study, with some individuals participating in multiple steps. Participants included 22 healthcare providers, 7 care partners, 4 decision-makers, and 2 PWLE. The final map selected by participants was an 8-cluster map, with the following cluster labels: (1) access to inpatient services and supports across the care continuum (13 statements); (2) informed and collaborative discharge planning (13 statements); (3) access to transitional and outpatient services (3 statements); (4) communication, education and knowledge acquisition (9 statements); (5) support for care partners (2 statements); (6) person-centred care (13 statements); (7) physical, social, and cognitive activities and supports (13 statements); and (8) provider knowledge, skills, roles and behaviours (8 statements).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our study findings highlight the importance of person-centred care, with active involvement of PWLE and their care partners throughout the care journey. Many participant statements included specific ideas related to continuity of care, and clinical knowledge and skills. This study provides insights for future interventions and quality improvement initiatives for enhancing transitions in care among hip fracture populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39186524
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307769
pii: PONE-D-24-10195
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0307769

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Guilcher et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Sara J T Guilcher (SJT)

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Lauren Cadel (L)

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Amanda C Everall (AC)

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Susan E Bronskill (SE)

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Walter P Wodchis (WP)

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Kednapa Thavorn (K)

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Kerry Kuluski (K)

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH