Ventricular tachycardia ablation with pentaspline pulsed field technology in two patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
ischemic cardiomyopathy
pulsed field ablation
radiofrequency
scar‐related
ventricular tachycardia
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Aug 2024
26 Aug 2024
Historique:
revised:
07
08
2024
received:
16
05
2024
accepted:
14
08
2024
medline:
27
8
2024
pubmed:
27
8
2024
entrez:
27
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Due to its unique features, pulsed field ablation (PFA) could potentially overcome some limitations of current radiofrequency (RF) ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. However, data on the use of PFA in this setting are currently scarce. Two patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and previously failed RF VT ablations were treated with PFA. A total of 18 bipolar applications (case1) and seven bipolar applications (case2) were delivered to the infero-lateral and infero-septal areas (case1) and to the apical lateral left ventricular (LV) wall (case2), placing the catheter adjacent to the LV wall in the flower configuration. A rapid cessation of VT and restoration of sinus rhythm were observed during PFA delivery in both cases. Further applications were delivered to achieve complete elimination of late potentials. In case 1, during the in-hospital stay, ECG monitoring did not show VT recurrences. Six-month follow-up was uneventful, with no VT recurrences at ICD interrogation. In case 2, due to postdischarge VT recurrences, a second RF procedure was scheduled 1 month later. The voltage map performed in sinus rhythm showed a low-voltage zone located at the anterolateral wall, near the previous ablation site. Numerous late potentials were recorded. At the 6-month follow-up, no further VT recurrences were documented after RF redo ablation. While the speed of application and potential transmural effect can facilitate the ablation of large diseased endocardial areas, early loss of contact due to difficult pentaspline catheter manipulation in the LV could lead to insufficient contact force and, consequently, inadequate energy penetration.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Tanner H, Hindricks G, Volkmer M, et al. Catheter ablation of recurrent scar‐related ventricular tachycardia using electroanatomical mapping and irrigated ablation technology: results of the prospective multicenter Euro‐VT‐study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(1):47‐53. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01563.x
Stevenson WG, Wilber DJ, Natale A, et al. Irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by electroanatomic mapping for recurrent ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction the multicenter thermocool ventricular tachycardia ablation trial. Circulation. 2008;118(25):2773‐2782. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.788604
Younis A, Zilberman I, Krywanczyk A, et al. Effect of pulsed‐field and radiofrequency ablation on heterogeneous ventricular scar in a swine model of healed myocardial infarction. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022;15(10):683‐692. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.122.011209
Im SI, Higuchi S, Lee A, et al. Pulsed field ablation of left ventricular myocardium in a swine infarct model. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8(6):722‐731. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2022.03.007
Solimene F, Compagnucci P, Tondo C, et al. Direct epicardial validation of posterior wall electroporation in persistent atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024;10:1200‐1202. doi:10.1016/J.JACEP.2024.04.003
Lozano‐Granero C, Hirokami J, Franco E, et al. Case series of ventricular tachycardia ablation with pulsed‐field ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023;9(9):1990‐1994. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2023.03.024
Katrapati P, Weiss JP, Baning D, Zawaneh M, Su W, Tung R. Pulsed field ablation for incessant scar‐related ventricular tachycardia: first U.S. report. Heart Rhythm. 2024;21(0):1236‐1239. doi:10.1016/J.HRTHM.2024.04.081
Schiavone M, Solimene F, Moltrasio M, et al. Pulsed field ablation technology for pulmonary vein and left atrial posterior wall isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024;35:1101‐1111. doi:10.1111/JCE.16246
Gasperetti A, Assis F, Tripathi H, et al. Determinants of acute irreversible electroporation lesion characteristics after pulsed field ablation: the role of voltage, contact, and adipose interference. Europace. 2023;25(9):euad257. doi:10.1093/europace/euad257
Tofig BJ, Lukac P, Nielsen JM, et al. Radiofrequency ablation lesions in low‐, intermediate‐, and normal‐voltage myocardium: an in vivo study in a porcine heart model. EP Europace. 2019;21(12):1919‐1927. doi:10.1093/europace/euz247
Di Biase L, Marazzato J, Zou F, et al. Point‐by‐point pulsed field ablation using a multimodality generator and a contact force‐sensing ablation catheter: comparison with radiofrequency ablation in a remapped chronic swine heart. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2023;16(12):663‐671. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012344
Nakagawa H, Castellvi Q, Neal R, et al. Effects of contact force on lesion size during pulsed field catheter ablation: histochemical characterization of ventricular lesion boundaries. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024;17(1):11‐23. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012026
De Lio F, Schiavone M, Mancini ME, et al. Stereotactic radioablation for recurrent or nearly incessant slow ventricular tachycardia treatment. Europace. 2024;26(6):euae137. doi:10.1093/EUROPACE/EUAE137