Assessing vaccine hesitancy and vaccine literacy among the European prison population and staff: A multicentre observational study.
Cross-sectional study
Prison population
Prison staff
Vaccination hesitancy
Vaccine literacy
Journal
Vaccine: X
ISSN: 2590-1362
Titre abrégé: Vaccine X
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101748769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
20
05
2024
revised:
24
07
2024
accepted:
26
07
2024
medline:
27
8
2024
pubmed:
27
8
2024
entrez:
27
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Vaccination is the most efficient and cost-effective public health intervention. Prison population, for its low social distancing, constant turnover, and high percentage of migrants, should be an important target of vaccination campaign. However, vaccination coverage in prison is low. In this study we estimated vaccine hesitancy and vaccine literacy among the prison population and staff and assessed their correlation. We conducted a cross-sectional study in 13 prisons of 4 European countries. The sample included 847 people living in prison and 755 staff members. Through a structured questionnaire we assessed vaccine hesitancy, vaccine literacy, general health literacy, previous vaccine refusal and socio-demographic characteristics of participants. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract three components of vaccine hesitancy. Logistic regression was applied to assess the association between previous vaccine refusal and vaccine hesitancy; linear regression was applied to assess the association between vaccine hesitancy and vaccine and general health literacy. All analyses were adjusted for socio-demographic variables. We identified three components of vaccine hesitancy explaining 49% of the total variance:
Identifiants
pubmed: 39189024
doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100537
pii: S2590-1362(24)00110-4
pmc: PMC11345573
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100537Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.