Telemonitoring with TECCU of active Inflammatory Bowel Disease is Not Inferior to Standard Care: Short-term Results of a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial of GETECCU.

BACKGROUND

Telemonitoring is not consistently superior to standard care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet non-inferiority may be an acceptable outcome if remote care is more efficient.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the remission time and quality of life of patients with an active IBD controlled by standard care or through the TECCU App (Telemonitoring of Crohn´s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis).

METHODS

A 2-arm, randomized, multicentre trial with a non-inferiority design was performed at 24 Spanish hospitals on adult patients with IBD who initiated immunosuppressant or biological therapy. Patients were randomized into telemonitoring (G_TECCU) or standard care groups (G_Control). The follow-up schedule was based on telemonitoring contacts through the TECCU App in G_TECCU, and on in-person visits and telephone calls in G_Control, as in clinical practice. In both groups, treatment was adjusted according to the evolution of disease activity and medication adherence, which were measured through specific indices and biological markers at each check-up. The primary outcome was time in remission after 12-weeks, with quality of life, medication adherence, adverse events and patient satisfaction as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 169 patients enrolled, 158 were randomized, and 150 were analyzed per protocol: telemonitoring (n=71); control (n=79). After 12-week, the time in clinical remission was not inferior after telemonitoring (4.20 ±3.73 weeks) to that in the controls (4.32 ±3.28 weeks), with a mean difference between arms of -0.12 weeks (95% CI -1.25-,1.01), non-inferiority p=0.017). The mean reduction of CRP values was -15.40 mg/L (SD=90.15, P =0.195) in G_TECCU and -13.16 mg/L (SD=54.61, P =0.053) in G_control, without significant differences between the two arms (P=.726). Similarly, the mean improvement of FC levels was 832.3 mg/L (SD=1825.0, P=.003) in G_TECCU and 1073.5 mg/L in G_Control (SD=3105.7, P=.03), but differences were not significant (P=.965). Quality of life improved in both groups, with a mean rise in the IBDQ-9 score of 13.44 points in G_TECCU (SD=19.1; P<.001) and 18.23 points [SD=22.9]; P=.001) in G_Control. Moreover, the proportion of patients who adhered to their medication rose significantly from 35.2% (25/71) to 67.6% (48/71) in G_TECCU (P=.001) and from 45.6% (36/79) to 73.4% (58/79) in G_Control (P=.001). Satisfaction remained stable around 90%, although non-inferiority was not demonstrated for secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemonitoring patients with active IBD is not inferior to standard care to achieve and maintain short-term remission. TECCU may be an alternative follow-up tool if the improved health outcomes and costs are confirmed in the long-term.

CLINICALTRIAL

The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT06031038; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06031038.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-10.2196/resprot.9639.