Cost-effectiveness analysis of proximal femoral nail versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.
Cost-effectiveness
Health management
Health policy
Quality of life
Reimbursement
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Aug 2024
27 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
15
02
2024
accepted:
21
07
2024
medline:
28
8
2024
pubmed:
28
8
2024
entrez:
27
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hip fractures are a serious public health problem with high rates of morbidity, mortality, disability and care costs. The aim of the research was to perform cost effectiveness analysis of hip fracture treatments using proximal femoral nail and bipolar hemiarthroplasty surgeries. The analysis was completed based on the perspectives of the paying institution and patient. A decision tree model was used to determine whether proximal femoral nail or bipolar arthroplasty was most cost effective for the management of a femoral neck fracture in this patient population. The findings from the decision tree model suggested that ICERs for BHP were TRY 43,164.53 TL/QALY based on reimbursement and TRY 3,977.35 TL/QALY based on patient expenditures. Compared to the calculated threshold value of TRY 60.575 TL, we concluded BHP to be a cost-effective option. Moreover, all parameter changes yielded stable results on the one-way sensitivity analysis. When it comes to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, BHP with specified threshold value was found to be cost-effective in all the comparisons. Currently available data the use of bipolar hemiarthroplasty as the more cost- effective treatment strategy in this specific population. Overall, our findings showed HA as a cost-effective surgical technique at the calculated threshold in a population over 60 years of age. The impacts of HA on patients' quality of life and costs are remarkable.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hip fractures are a serious public health problem with high rates of morbidity, mortality, disability and care costs. The aim of the research was to perform cost effectiveness analysis of hip fracture treatments using proximal femoral nail and bipolar hemiarthroplasty surgeries.
METHODS
METHODS
The analysis was completed based on the perspectives of the paying institution and patient. A decision tree model was used to determine whether proximal femoral nail or bipolar arthroplasty was most cost effective for the management of a femoral neck fracture in this patient population.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The findings from the decision tree model suggested that ICERs for BHP were TRY 43,164.53 TL/QALY based on reimbursement and TRY 3,977.35 TL/QALY based on patient expenditures. Compared to the calculated threshold value of TRY 60.575 TL, we concluded BHP to be a cost-effective option. Moreover, all parameter changes yielded stable results on the one-way sensitivity analysis. When it comes to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, BHP with specified threshold value was found to be cost-effective in all the comparisons. Currently available data the use of bipolar hemiarthroplasty as the more cost- effective treatment strategy in this specific population.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, our findings showed HA as a cost-effective surgical technique at the calculated threshold in a population over 60 years of age. The impacts of HA on patients' quality of life and costs are remarkable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39192359
doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04941-3
pii: 10.1186/s13018-024-04941-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
507Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Boriani G, Maniadakis N, Auricchio A, et al. Health technology assessment in interventional electrophysiology and device therapy: a position paper of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(25):1869–74.
pubmed: 23391583
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht031
Fidan D. Economic evaluation methods. J Health Econ. 2009;1:4–7.
Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham R, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis for Priority setting. Washington (DC): the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Joore M, Grimm S, Boonen A, et al. Health technology assessment: a framework. RMD Open. 2020;6:1–3.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001289
WHO. Ageing and health. 2022. URL: [ https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health ].
Öztürk İ, Toker S, Ertürer E, et al. Evaluation of risk factors affecting mortality in patients over 65 years of age operated for hip fracture. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008;42(1):16–21.
pubmed: 18354272
doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2008.016
Primeau CA, Zomar BO, Somerville LE, et al. Health economic evaluations of hip and knee interventions in orthopedic sports medicine: a systematic review and quality assessment. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(3):1–13.
doi: 10.1177/2325967120987241
Cole ZA, Dennison EM, Cooper C. Osteoporosis epidemiology update. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2008;10:92–6.
pubmed: 18460262
doi: 10.1007/s11926-008-0017-6
Tüzün S, Eskiyurt N, Akarirmak U, et al. Incidence of hip fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis in Turkey: the FRACTURK study. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(3):949–55.
pubmed: 21594756
doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1655-5
Larranaga I, Etxebarrıa-Foronda I, Ibarrondo O, et al. Stratified cost-utility analysis of total hip arthroplasty in displaced femoral neck fracture. Gac Sanit. 2021;36(1):12–8.
pubmed: 33888335
doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.02.006
Burgers PTPW, Hoogendoorn M, Van Woensel EAC, et al. Total medical costs of treating femoral neck fracture patients with hemi- or total hip arthroplasty: a cost analysis of a multicenter prospective study. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27:1999–2008.
pubmed: 26821137
pmcid: 4869739
doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3484-z
Slover J, Hoffman MV, Malchau H, et al. A cost effectiveness analysis of the arthroplasty options for displaced femoral neck fractures in the active, healthy, elderly population. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6):854–60.
pubmed: 18701245
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.008
Bozic K, Morshed S, Silverstein MD, et al. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate new technologies in orthopedics. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88(4):706–14.
pubmed: 16595459
Gorman P. Economic Evaluation of Arthroplasty Choice for femoral Neck fractures. Queensland University School of Public Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; 2016.
Marinelli M, Soccetti A, Panfoli N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty. A Markov decision analysis based on implant cost. J Orthop Traumatol. 2008;9(1):23–8.
pubmed: 19384477
pmcid: 2656970
doi: 10.1007/s10195-008-0100-9
Loures LF, Chaoubah A, Maciel VS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment for hip fractures among the elderly in Brazil. Revista Brasileira De Ortop. 2015;50(1):38–42.
doi: 10.1016/j.rbo.2014.04.002
Mujica-Mota Rewatson LK, Tarricone R, Jager M. Cost-effectiveness of timely versus delayed primary total hip replacement in Germany: a social health insurance perspective. Orthop Rev. 2017;9(3):76–87.
Alolabi B, Bajammal S, Shirali J, et al. Treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a cost-benefit analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(6):442–6.
pubmed: 19550232
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31817614dd
Frihagen F, Waaler GM, Madsen JE, et al. The cost of hemiarthroplasty compared to that of internal fixation for femoral neck fractures. 2-year results involving 222 patients based on a randomized controlled trial. Acta Orthopaedical. 2010;81(4):446–52.
doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.492763
Lıu P, Jin D, Zhang C, Gao Y. Revision surgery due to failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: current state-of-the-art. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(573):1–8.
Waaler Bjornelv GM, Frihagen F, Madsen JE, et al. Hemiarthroplasty compared to internal fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws as treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: cost-utility analysis performed alongside a randomized, controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(6):1711–9.
pubmed: 21997224
doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1772-1
Martinho T, Stoffel K. Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with hip arthroplasty in older patients: a narrative review of indications and outcomes. Medicina. 2021;57(8):763–8.
pubmed: 34440969
pmcid: 8400749
doi: 10.3390/medicina57080763
Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluations publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16:231–50.
pubmed: 23538175
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002
Deng J, Wang G, Li J, Wang S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing arthroplasty and internal fixation in the treatment of elderly displaced femoral neck fractures. OTA Int. 2021;4(1):1–12.
doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000087
Sinici E, Tunay S, Tunay V, et al. Evaluation of quality of life in patients undergoing primary hip replacement. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008;42(1):22–5.
pubmed: 18354273
TMMA. 2020. URL. [ https://www.titck.gov.tr/faaliyetalanlari/ilac/ilacta-fiyatlandirma ].
Tai BWB, Bae YH, Le QA, et al. A systematic review of health economic evaluation studies using the patient’s perspective. Value Health. 2016;19(6):903–8.
pubmed: 27712720
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.05.010
Jit M, Mibei W. Discounting in the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of a vaccination programme: a critical review. Vaccine. 2015;33(32):3788–94.
pubmed: 26144897
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.084
Aleem IS, Karanıcolas PJ, Bhandari M. Arthroplasty versus internal fixation of femoral neck fractures: a clinical decision analysis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2009;11(3):233–41.
pubmed: 19620741
Ekinci Y, Gürbüz K, Batin S, et al. A multicenter intertrochanteric fracture study in the elderly: Hemiarthroplasty versus proximal femoral nailing. Joint Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(2):209–17.
Jang SY, Cha YH, Kim KJ, et al. The effect of surgery type on mortality in elderly patients with per trochanteric femoral fracture: a Korean nationwide cohort study. Asian J Surg. 2020;43(4):550–6.
pubmed: 31324508
doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.06.006
Jolly A, Bansal R, More AR, et al. Comparison of complications and functional results of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur treated with proximal femur nails and cemented hemiarthroplasty. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(2):296–301.
pubmed: 30828197
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.09.015
Çiloğlu O, Karaali E, Kuşvuran Özkan A, et al. Distally-fixed non-modular monoblocs fluted long-stem hemiarthroplasty versus proximal femoral nailing for elderly patients with an osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture: a retrospective comparative study. Hip International: J Clin Experimental Res Hip Pathol Therapy. 2022;32(1):124–30.
doi: 10.1177/1120700020963529
Kibble K, Peck SC, Parikh HR, et al. Geriatric femoral Neck fractures: Hemiarthroplasty Implant Trends across a Health System from 2006 to 2018. Geriatric Orthop Surg Rehabilitation. 2020;11:1–7.
Dogu B, Soydemir R, Yamac S, et al. Evaluation of risk factors associated with osteoporotic hip fracture. Turk J Osteoporos. 2010;16:13–6.
Pekonen SR, Kopra J, Kroger H, et al. Regional and gender-specific analyses give new perspectives for secular trend in hip fracture incidence. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32(9):1725–33.
pubmed: 33712877
pmcid: 8387269
doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05906-6
Banks E, Reeves GK, Beral V, et al. Hip fracture incidence in relation to age, menopausal status, and age at menopause: prospective analysis. PLoS Med. 2009;6(11):1–9.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000181
Formiga F, Navarro M, Duaso E, et al. Factors associated with hip fracture-related falls among patients with a history of recurrent falling. Bone. 2008;43(5):941–4.
pubmed: 18656561
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.06.014
Leavy B, Byberg L, Michaelson K, et al. The fall descriptions and health characteristics of older adults with hip fracture: a mixed methods study. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15(40):1–11.
Zhang YW, Lu PP, Li YJ, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and Associated Risk factors of the Elderly with hip fractures: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2005–2010. Clin Interv Aging. 2021;16:177–85.
pubmed: 33542622
pmcid: 7851483
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S291071
Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, et al. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(4):721–39.
pubmed: 10780864
doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.721
Melton LJ, Kearns AE, Atkinson EJ, et al. Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(5):687–94.
pubmed: 18797813
doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0742-8
Ekici C, Pazarci Ö, Kılınc S, et al. Effect on mortality of treatment method and surgery time for hip fracture patients aged over 65 years. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020;26(3):439–44.
pubmed: 32436981
Zhou S, Liu J, Zhen P, et al. Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):500–7.
pubmed: 31664982
pmcid: 6820901
doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2793-8
Lloyd R, Baker G, MAcdonald J, Thompson NW. Co-morbidities in patients with a hip fracture. Ulster Med J. 2019;88(3):162–6.
pubmed: 31619850
pmcid: 6790636
Geiger F, Zimmermann-Stenzel M, Heisel C, et al. Trochanteric fractures in the elderly: the influence of primary hip arthroplasty on 1-year mortality. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:959–66.
pubmed: 17899138
pmcid: 2111040
doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0423-7
Fu M, Guo J, Zhao Y, et al. Characteristics of fall-related fractures in older adults with cerebrovascular disease: a cross-sectional study. Clin Interv Aging. 2021;16:1337–46.
pubmed: 34285478
pmcid: 8286076
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S316739
Iorio R, Healy WL, Lemos DW, et al. Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;383:229–42.
doi: 10.1097/00003086-200102000-00027
Rogmark C, Spetz CL, Garellick G. More intramedullary nails and arthroplasties for treatment of hip fractures in Sweden. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(5):588–92.
pubmed: 20860442
pmcid: 3214748
doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506631
Rajabi M, Ostovar A, Sari AA, et al. Direct costs of common osteoporotic fractures (hip, vertebral and forearm) in Iran. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(651):1–7.
Balkhi B, Alghamdi A, Alqusair S, et al. Estimated direct medical cost of osteoporosis in Saudi Arabia: a single-center retrospective cost analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:9831–41.
pubmed: 34574755
pmcid: 8471418
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189831
Yong TM, Austin DC, Molloy IB, et al. Screw fixation Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Nondisplaced femoral Neck fractures in the Elderly: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2020;34(7):348–55.
pubmed: 32398470
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001747
Esen E, Dur H, Ataoglu MB, et al. Evaluation of proximal femoral nail-antirotation and cemented, bipolar hemiarthroplasty with calcar replacement in treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in terms of mortality and morbidity ratios. Joint Dis Relat Surg. 2017;28(1):35–40.
Swart E, Makhni E, Macaulay W, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fixation options for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2014;96(19):1612–20.
pubmed: 25274786
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00603
Thorsness RJ, Iannuzzi JC, Shields EJ, et al. The cost-effectiveness of open reduction and internal fixation compared with hemiarthroplasty in the management of complex proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;24(8):e232–3.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.006
Blythe R, O’gorman PM, Crawford RW, et al. Fixation method for hip arthroplasty stem following hip fracture: a population-level cost-effectiveness analysis. J Arthroplast. 2020;35(6):1614–21.
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.001