Interoceptive awareness in a Southeastern US college sample: validation of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness - version 2.
Body-awareness
Interoception
Mind-body
Mindfulness
Somatic psychotherapies
Journal
BMC research notes
ISSN: 1756-0500
Titre abrégé: BMC Res Notes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462768
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Aug 2024
27 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
21
08
2023
accepted:
07
08
2024
medline:
28
8
2024
pubmed:
28
8
2024
entrez:
27
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, version 2 (MAIA-2) is a commonly utilized self-report instrument to assess individuals' ability to perceive bodily sensations. The MAIA-2 has displayed variable psychometric properties across samples. Thus, we examine the psychometric properties of the MAIA-2 in a Southeastern United States college sample. Our studies consisted of 710 (study 1) and 66 (study 2) college students. Study 1 used a cross-sectional research design where we investigated the factor structure, and measurement invariance (e.g., measured similarly across genders). Study 2 examined the test-retest reliability across a three-week period. The MAIA-2 displayed adequate to good internal consistencies and factor loadings, strict invariance, and questionable temporal stability. The MAIA-2 demonstrates adequate psychometric properties in this college sample that were similar to the original MAIA sample characteristics. Contextual and cultural factors may influence the subjective experience of interpreting bodily sensations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39192368
doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06894-6
pii: 10.1186/s13104-024-06894-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
236Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Limone P, Toto GA. Factors that predispose undergraduates to mental issues: A cumulative literature review for future research perspectives. Front Public Health. 2022;10:831349. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.831349 .
American Psychological Association (APA). Campus mental health, American Psychological Association., https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/10/mental-health-campus-care . Accessed June 28, 2022.
Wilkinson CB, Infantolino ZP, Wacha-Monyes A. Evidence-based practice as a potential solution to burnout in university counseling center clinicians. Psychol Serv. 2017;14(4):543–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000156 .
doi: 10.1037/ser0000156
pubmed: 29120212
Bamber MD, Schneider JK. College students’ perceptions of mindfulness-based interventions: a narrative review of the qualitative research. Curr Psychol. 2022;4:667–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-00592-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s12144-00592-4
Falsafi N. A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness versus yoga: effects on depression and/or anxiety in college students. J am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2016;22(6):483–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390316663397 .
doi: 10.1177/1078390316663397
pubmed: 27566622
McIndoo CC, File AA, Preddy T, Clark CG, Hopko DR. Mindfulness-based therapy and behavioral activation: a randomized controlled trial with depressed college students. Behav Res Ther. 2016;77:118–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.012 .
doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.012
pubmed: 26745622
Mehling WE, Gopisetty V, Daubenmier J, Price CJ, Hecht FM, Stewart A. Body awareness: construct and self-report measures. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(5):e56141–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005614 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005614
Bornemann B, Herbert BM, Mehling WE, Singer T. Differential changes in self-reported aspects of interoceptive awareness through 3 months of contemplative training. Front Psychol. 2015;5:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01504 .
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01504
Khalsa SS, Adolphs R, Cameron OG, Critchley HD, Davenport PW, Feinstein JS et al. Interoception and mental health: A roadmap. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;3(5):501–513. doi.10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.004.
Garfinkel SN, Seth AK, Barrett AB, Suzuki K, Critchley HD. Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Bio Psychol. 2015;104(2015):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/biopsycho.2014.11.004 .
doi: 10.1016/biopsycho.2014.11.004
Ferentzi E, Olaru G, Geiger M, Vig L, Köteles F, Wihelm O. Examining the factor structure and validity of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness. J Pers Assess. 2021;103(5):675–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1813147 .
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1813147
pubmed: 32955947
Mehling WE, Price C, Daubenmier JJ, Acree M, Bartmess E, Stewart A. The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLoS ONE. 2012;4(5):e5614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005614 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005614
Mehling WE, Acree M, Stewart A, Silas J, Jones A. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, version 2 (Maia-2). PLoS ONE. 2018;13(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208034 .
Bullock AJ, Goldbacher EM. Interoceptive awareness and emotional eating in college women: the role of appetite and emotional awareness. J AM Coll Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2021.1970566 .
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1970566
pubmed: 34469250
Lovan P, Prado G, Lee T, Coccia CA. Snapshot of eating behaviors in undergraduate college students living in South Florida. J AM Coll Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2119402 .
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2119402
pubmed: 36084262
Oswald A, Chapman J, Wilson C. Do interoceptive awareness and interoceptive responsiveness mediate the relationship between body appreciation and intuitive eating in young women? Appetite. 2017;109:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.019 .
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.019
pubmed: 27866989
Kabir RS. Interoceptive attention tendencies predict trait anxiety in undergraduate students and hospital nurses participating in stress management programs. Bull Grad School Educ Hiroshima Univ Part III. 2019;68:111–20.
Vig L, Köteles F, Ferentzi E. Questionnaires of interocpetion do not assess the same construct. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(8):e0273299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.prone.023299 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.prone.023299
pubmed: 35998182
pmcid: 9397851
Reis D. Further insights into the German version of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (maia): exploratory and bayesian structural equation modeling approaches. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2019;35(3):317–25. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000404
Gim W, Sim K, Cho O. Korean multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (K-MAIA): development and validation. Korean J Stress Res. 2016;24(3):177–92. https://doi.org/10.17547/kjsr.2016.3.177 .
doi: 10.17547/kjsr.2016.3.177
Lin FL, Hsu CC, Mehling W, Yeh ML. Translation and psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the multidimensional assessment of the interoceptive awareness. J Nurs Res 2017;\ 25(1):76–83. doi: 10/1097/jnr.0000000000000182.
Baranauskas M, Grabausaitė A, Griškova-Bulanova. Psychometric characteristics of Lithuanian Version of Multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (maia
Cali G, Ambronsini E, Picconi L, Mheling WE, Committeri G. Investigating the relationship between interoceptive accuracy, interoceptive awareness, and emotional susceptibility. Front. Psychol. 2015;6(1202). doi.org/fpsyh.2015.01202.
Machorrinho J, Veiga G, Fernandes J, Mehling W, Marmeleria J. Multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness: psychometric properties of the Portuguese version. Percept Mot Skills. 2018;126(1):87–105. doi. 10/1177/0031512518813231.
Fujino H. Further validation of the Japanese version of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(530). doi.org/10/1186/s13104-019-4556-x
Shoji M, Mehling WE, Hautzinger M, Herbert B. Investigating multidimensional interoceptive awareness in a Japanese population: Validation of the Japanese MAIA-J. Front Psychol 2018;9:1855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01855
Valenzulela-Moguillansky C, Reyes-Reyes A. Psychometric properties of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (maia) in a Chilean population. Front Psychol. 2015;2015(6):120. https://doi.org/10.3389/psyg.2015.00120 .
doi: 10.3389/psyg.2015.00120
Montoya-Hurtado O, Gómez-Jaramillo N, Bermúdez-Jaimes G, et al. Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive awareness (MAIA) questionnaire in Colombian University students. J Clin Med. 2023;12(8):2937. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082937 . Published 2023 Apr 18.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12082937
pubmed: 37109273
pmcid: 10145849
Todd J, Barron D, Aspell JE, Toh EKL, Zahari HS, Khatib NAM, Swami V. Translation and validation of a Bahasa Malaysia (malay) version of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4):e0231048. 10.1371journal.pone.0231048.
Osher Center for Integrative Health. Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. Accessed June 13. 2024. https://osher.ucsf.edu/research/maia
Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015;349(aao4716). doi.org/aac4716.
R Core Team. R: a Language and environment for statistical processing [computer software]. Version 4.2.2. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013.
Little RJA. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83(404):1198–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.1047822 .
doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.1047822
Van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2023;45(3):1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03 .
doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 .
doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
Commun Methods Meas. 2020;14(1):1–24. doi:10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629.
Zhang Z, Yuan KH. Robust coefficient alpha and omega and confidence intervals with outlying observations and missing data: methods and software. Educ Psychol Meas. 2016;76(3):387–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415594658 .
doi: 10.1177/0013164415594658
pubmed: 29795870
Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48:1273–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternative. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 .
doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Guildford; 2011.
Rosseel Y, Lavaan. An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/ .
doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Putnick DL, Bornstein MH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev Rev. 2016;41:71–90. https://doi.org/10/1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Sass DA. Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within confirmatory factor analysis framework. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2011;29(4):347–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406661 .
doi: 10.1177/0734282911406661
Scheffers M, Coenen J, Moeijes J, Bellemans T. The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2 (MAIA-2): psychometric properties in a Dutch non-clinical sample. BMC Psychol. 2024;12(53):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01553-8 .
doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01553-8
Slotta T, Witthöft M, Gerlach AL, Pohl A. The interplay of interoceptive accuracy, facets of interoceptive sensibility, and trait anxiety: a network analysis. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;182:111133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111133 .
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111133
Gaggero G, Dellantonio S, Pastore L, Sng KHL, Esposito G. Shared and unique interoceptive deficits in high alexithymia and neurocticism. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(8):e0273922. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.prone.0273922 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.prone.0273922
pubmed: 36044535
pmcid: 9432684
Price CJ, Weng HY. Facilitating adaptive emotion processing and somatic reappraisal via sustained mindful interoceptive attention. Front Psychol. 2021;12:578827. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.58827 .
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.58827
pubmed: 34566738
pmcid: 8457046