Investigating the crystallinity of hard candies prepared and stored at different temperatures with low field-NMR relaxometry.
1H‐NMR
T1
crystallinity
hard candy
moisture content
second moment
Journal
Journal of the science of food and agriculture
ISSN: 1097-0010
Titre abrégé: J Sci Food Agric
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376334
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Aug 2024
28 Aug 2024
Historique:
revised:
30
03
2024
received:
14
04
2023
accepted:
14
08
2024
medline:
28
8
2024
pubmed:
28
8
2024
entrez:
28
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In this study, hard candies were produced by using sucrose, glucose syrup and water. They were cooked at different temperatures, changing from 135 to 145 °C with an interval of 2.5 °C. They were stored at different storage temperatures, which were 25, 4, -18 and -80 °C. Hard candies placed at room temperature were stored for 2 months. In order to understand the crystallization characteristics of the hard candies, time domain (TD) proton nuclear magnetic resonance ( Increasing cooking temperature increased the crystallinity and decreased the moisture content of the hard candies significantly (P ≤0.05). Furthermore, storage temperature and storage time had significant effects on the crystallinity of the hard candies (P ≤0.05). The results of T This study demonstrated that the crystallinity of hard candies can be observed and examined by TD-NMR relaxometry, as an alternative to commonly used methods. © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In this study, hard candies were produced by using sucrose, glucose syrup and water. They were cooked at different temperatures, changing from 135 to 145 °C with an interval of 2.5 °C. They were stored at different storage temperatures, which were 25, 4, -18 and -80 °C. Hard candies placed at room temperature were stored for 2 months. In order to understand the crystallization characteristics of the hard candies, time domain (TD) proton nuclear magnetic resonance (
RESULTS
RESULTS
Increasing cooking temperature increased the crystallinity and decreased the moisture content of the hard candies significantly (P ≤0.05). Furthermore, storage temperature and storage time had significant effects on the crystallinity of the hard candies (P ≤0.05). The results of T
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrated that the crystallinity of hard candies can be observed and examined by TD-NMR relaxometry, as an alternative to commonly used methods. © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Organisme : European Commission
Organisme : Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange
ID : 101008228
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Références
Lans AM, Frelka JC, Paluri S and Vodovotz Y, Physical properties and sensory analysis of galacto‐oligosaccharide glassy confections. LWT 96:499–506 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.05.056.
Sherwin CP and Labuza T, Beyond water activity and glass transition: A broad perspective on the manner by which water can influence reaction rates in foods, in Water Properties Food, Pharmaceutical and Biological Materials, 1st edn, ed. by Buera MP, Welti‐Chanes J, Lillford PJ and Jorti HR. CRC Press, New York, pp. 343–376 (2006).
Roos Y and Karel M, Plasticizing Effect of Water on Thermal Behavior and Crystallization of Amorphous Food Models. J Food Sci. 56:38–43 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb07970.x.
McFetridge J, Rades T and Lim M, Influence of hydrogenated starch hydrolysates on the glass transition and crystallisation of sugar alcohols. Food Res Int 37:409–415 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2004.01.005.
Loehlin JH, Crystallization: Theory and practice (Van Hook, Andrew). J Chem Educ. 39:A690 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1021/ed039pA690.2.
Helt JE, Effects of Supersaturation and Temperature on Nucleation and Crystal Growth in a MSMPR Crystallizer Recommended Citation (1976). https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/6213.
Hartel RW, Crystallization in foods, in Handbook of Industrial Crystallization, 2nd edn, ed. by Myerson AS. Butterworth‐Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 287–304 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075067012-8/50015-X.
Torres DPM, Bastos M, Gonalves MDPF, Teixeira JA and Rodrigues LR, Water sorption and plasticization of an amorphous galacto‐oligosaccharide mixture. Carbohydr Polym 83:831–835 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.063.
Roos YH, Importance of glass transition and water activity to spray drying and stability of dairy powders. Lait 82:475 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1051/lait:2002025.
Nowakowski CM and Hartel RW, Moisture sorption of amorphous sugar products. J Food Sci. 67:1419–1425 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb10300.x.
Iglesias HA, Chirife J and Buera MP, Adsorption isotherm of amorphous trehalose. J Sci Food Agric. 75:183–186 (1997).
Lees R and Jackson EB, Sugar_Confectionery_and_Chocolate_Manufacture, 1st edn. Springer, Boston, MA (1995).
Karel M, Buera P, Roos Y, Blanshard JMV and Lillford PJ, Effects of glass transitions on processing and storage. Sci and Tech Glassy State Foods 1:13–34 (1993).
Ergun R, Lietha R and Hartel RW, Moisture and shelf life in sugar confections. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 50:162–192 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390802248833.
Jenkins M and Toft M, The effect of crystalline morphology on the glass transition and enthalpic relaxation in poly (ether‐ether‐ketone) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham) (2012).
Le Botlan D, Casseron F and Lantier F, Polymorphism of sugars studied by time domain NMR. Analusis 26:198–204 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1051/analusis:1998135.
Nunes C, Mahendrasingam A and Suryanarayanan R, Quantification of crystallinity in substantially amorphous materials by synchrotron X‐ray powder diffractometry. Pharm Res 22:1942–1953 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-005-7626-9.
Martins PM, Rocha FA and Rein P, Modeling sucrose evaporative crystallization. Part 1. Vacuum pan monitoring by mass balance and image analysis methods. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:8858–8864 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050639h.
Dejong AE and Hartel RW, Determination of sorbitol crystal content and crystallization rate using TD‐NMR. J Food Eng 178:117–123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.01.012.
Wong KC, Review of NMR Spectroscopy: Basic Principles, Concepts and Applications in Chemistry. J Chem Educ 91:1103–1104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500324w.
Grunin L, Oztop MH, Guner S and Baltaci SF, Exploring the crystallinity of different powder sugars through solid echo and magic sandwich echo sequences. Magnetic Res Chem 57:607–615 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.4866.
Grunin LY, Grunin YB, Nikolskaya EA, Sheveleva NN and Nikolaev IA, An NMR relaxation and spin diffusion study of cellulose structure during water adsorption. Biophysics 62:198–206 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350917020087.
Hashemi RH, Bradley WG and Lisanti CJ, MRI: the basics: The Basics. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (2010).
Grunin L, Ivanova M, Schiraya V and Grunina T, Time‐Domain NMR Techniques in Cellulose Structure Analysis. Appl Magn Reson 54:929–955 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-023-01600-4.
Noyes AA and Whitney WR, The Rate of Solution of Solid Substances in Their Own Solutions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 19:930–934 (1897). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02086a003.
Schotsmans WC, Spain AE and Woolf A, Tamarillo (Solanum betaceum (Cav.)), in Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK, pp. 427–442 (2011).
Li R, Kerr W, Toledo RT and Carpenter JA, 1H NMR Studies of Water in Chicken Breast Marinated with Different Phosphates. J Food Sci. 65:575–580 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb16051.x.
Hartel RW, von Elbe JH and Hofberger R, Hard Candy, in Confectionery Science and Technology, ed. by Hartel RW, von Elbe JH and Hofberger R. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 211–244 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61 742-8_8.
Hartel RW, Ergun R and Vogel S, Phase/State Transitions of Confectionery Sweeteners: Thermodynamic and Kinetic Aspects. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 10:17–32 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00136.x.
Zumbé A, Lee A and Storey D, Polyols in confectionery: the route to sugar‐free, reduced sugar and reduced calorie confectionery. British Journal of Nutrition 85:S31–S45 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2000260.
Lopez‐Rubio A, Flanagan BM, Gilbert EP and Gidley MJ, A novel approach for calculating starch crystallinity and its correlation with double helix content: A combined XRD and NMR study. Biopolymers 89:761–768 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.21005.
Becher M, Lichtinger A, Minikejew R, Vogel M and Rössler EA, NMR Relaxometry Accessing the Relaxation Spectrum in Molecular Glass Formers. Int J Mol Sci 23:5118 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095118.
Mukaka MM, Statistics Corner: A Guide to Appropriate Use of Correlation Coefficient in Medical Research. Malawi Med J 24:69–71 (2012).