Parastomal Hernia Prevention Using Funnel-Shaped Intra-Abdominal Mesh Compared to No Mesh: The Chimney Randomized Clinical Trial.


Journal

JAMA surgery
ISSN: 2168-6262
Titre abrégé: JAMA Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589553

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 28 8 2024
pubmed: 28 8 2024
entrez: 28 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent parastomal hernia. Evidence to support this practice is contradictory. To determine whether funnel-shaped permanent synthetic parastomal mesh is effective and safe in parastomal hernia prevention. The Chimney Trial was a randomized single-blinded multicenter trial conducted in 4 hospitals in Finland and 1 in Sweden from February 2019 and September 2021. Of 439 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection or the Hartmann procedure, 143 were enrolled in the trial, 135 received their allocated intervention, and 121 were analyzed at 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to May 2024. In the intervention group, a permanent colostomy was created with a funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh and compared to a control group with a stoma without the mesh. The primary end point was the incidence of computed tomography (CT)-confirmed parastomal hernia 12 months after surgery. There were 68 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [11.6] years; 36 [53% male and 32 [47%] female) who received the intended allocation in the mesh group and 67 (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [11.7] years; 48 [72%] male and 19 [28%] female) who received the intended allocation in the control group. CT scans were available for 58 patients in the mesh group and 59 patients in the control group at the 12-month follow-up. CT scans confirmed parastomal hernia in 6 of 58 patients (10%) in the mesh group compared to 22 of 59 patients (37%) in the control group (difference, 27%; 95% CI, 12-41; P < .001). Clinical parastomal hernia as a secondary outcome was recorded in 1 of 60 patients (2%) in the mesh group compared to 27 of 61 (43%) in the control group (difference, 41%; 95% CI, 29-55; P < .001). The number of patients with Clavien-Dindo class II ileus was 23 (35%) in the mesh group compared to 11 (17%) in the control group (difference, 18%; 95% CI, 3-32; P = .006). Only slight differences between the groups were detected in other stoma-related complications, readmissions, operative time, surgical site infections, reoperations, and quality of life. In this study, funnel-shaped parastomal mesh prevented a significant number of parastomal hernias without predisposing patients to mesh- or stoma-related complications during 12-month follow-up. The results of this study suggest the funnel-shaped mesh is a feasible option to prevent parastomal hernia. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799939.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39196580
pii: 2822877
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03799939']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Elisa Mäkäräinen (E)

Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Heikki Wiik (H)

Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Maziar Nikberg (M)

Department of Surgery Västmanland's Hospital Västerås and Centre for Clinical Research Region Västmanland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Jyrki Kössi (J)

Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.

Monika Carpelan-Holmström (M)

Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Tarja Pinta (T)

Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland.

Kirsi Lehto (K)

Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

Marko Nikki (M)

Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Jyri Järvinen (J)

Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Pasi Ohtonen (P)

Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Tero Rautio (T)

Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Classifications MeSH