Performance of balloon-expandable transcatheter bioprostheses in inoperable patients with pure aortic regurgitation of a native valve: The BE-PANTHEON international project.

Balloon-expandable MyVal Pure aortic regurgitation Sapien TAVR Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Journal

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
ISSN: 1878-0938
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Revasc Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 12 06 2024
revised: 19 07 2024
accepted: 14 08 2024
medline: 31 8 2024
pubmed: 31 8 2024
entrez: 28 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The off-label utilization of transcatheter heart valve (THV) devices for the treatment of inoperable or high-surgical risk patients with pure native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) has demonstrated suboptimal outcomes, both with self- and balloon-expandable (BE) devices. The aim of this study is to compare the use of different BE scaffolds in treating pure NAVR. Consecutive patients with pure severe NAVR who were deemed to be at high-risk and were treated with last-generation BE-THVs among seventeen Centers in Europe and US. Technical and device success rates were the primary objectives. Between February 2018 and July 2023, among 144 patients, 41 (28 %) received a MyVal device and 103 (72 %) were treated with a Sapien THV. Patients treated with a MyVal THV had an extra-large annulus more frequently compared to the Sapien group (49%vs.20 %, p < 0.001). Technical and device success rates were 90 % and 81 %, respectively, p > 0.1. The rate of THV migration/embolization (MyVal 4.9%vs. Sapien 11 %, p = 0.4) and second valve needed (4.9%vs.7.8 %, p = 0.7) were numerically lower in the MyVal group, whereas the rate of at least moderate paravalvular leak (15%vs.7.8 %, p = 0.2) and permanent pacemaker implantation (25%vs.18 %, p = 0.16) were numerically higher in the Myval group. Off-label use of BE devices for pure NAVR represents a potential alternative in high-risk patients in the absence of dedicated devices. However, BE in NAVR is associated with suboptimal outcomes. The availability of larger THV sizes may introduce transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an effective treatment for patients traditionally deemed unsuitable. AR = aortic regurgitation, BE = balloon-expandable, NAVR = native aortic valve regurgitation, PM = pacemaker, TAVR = transcatheter aortic valve replacement, THV = transcatheter heart valve, TVEM = transcatheter valve embolization and migration, VARC-3 = Valve Academic Research Consortium 3.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The off-label utilization of transcatheter heart valve (THV) devices for the treatment of inoperable or high-surgical risk patients with pure native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) has demonstrated suboptimal outcomes, both with self- and balloon-expandable (BE) devices. The aim of this study is to compare the use of different BE scaffolds in treating pure NAVR.
METHODS METHODS
Consecutive patients with pure severe NAVR who were deemed to be at high-risk and were treated with last-generation BE-THVs among seventeen Centers in Europe and US. Technical and device success rates were the primary objectives.
RESULTS RESULTS
Between February 2018 and July 2023, among 144 patients, 41 (28 %) received a MyVal device and 103 (72 %) were treated with a Sapien THV. Patients treated with a MyVal THV had an extra-large annulus more frequently compared to the Sapien group (49%vs.20 %, p < 0.001). Technical and device success rates were 90 % and 81 %, respectively, p > 0.1. The rate of THV migration/embolization (MyVal 4.9%vs. Sapien 11 %, p = 0.4) and second valve needed (4.9%vs.7.8 %, p = 0.7) were numerically lower in the MyVal group, whereas the rate of at least moderate paravalvular leak (15%vs.7.8 %, p = 0.2) and permanent pacemaker implantation (25%vs.18 %, p = 0.16) were numerically higher in the Myval group.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Off-label use of BE devices for pure NAVR represents a potential alternative in high-risk patients in the absence of dedicated devices. However, BE in NAVR is associated with suboptimal outcomes. The availability of larger THV sizes may introduce transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an effective treatment for patients traditionally deemed unsuitable.
NON-STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS UNASSIGNED
AR = aortic regurgitation, BE = balloon-expandable, NAVR = native aortic valve regurgitation, PM = pacemaker, TAVR = transcatheter aortic valve replacement, THV = transcatheter heart valve, TVEM = transcatheter valve embolization and migration, VARC-3 = Valve Academic Research Consortium 3.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39198100
pii: S1553-8389(24)00630-4
doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.08.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest AS has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and NeoChord Inc. AL has served on the advisory board for Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Shifamed, NeoChord Inc., V-dyne, and Philips. LT is proctor/consultant for Abbot, BSCI, Medtronic, Meril. The other authors did not report any conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Enrico Poletti (E)

Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Department, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.

Ignacio Amat-Santos (I)

Instituto de Ciencias del Corazón (ICICOR), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Enrico Criscione (E)

Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Department, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.

Antonio Popolo Rubbio (A)

Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Department, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.

Mario García-Gómez (M)

Instituto de Ciencias del Corazón (ICICOR), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Mateusz Orzalkiewicz (M)

Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, IRCCS University Hospital of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Manuel Pan (M)

Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, University of Córdoba, IMIBIC - CIBERCV, Spain.

Antonio Sisinni (A)

Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Department, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.

Mattia Squillace (M)

Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Department, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.

Bruno García Del Blanco (BG)

Cardiology Department, Hospital Val d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

Francesco Bruno (F)

Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Vasileios Panoulas (V)

Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Radoslaw Pracon (R)

Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Ole De Backer (O)

Department of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Maurizio Taramasso (M)

Klinik Hirslanden, HerzZentrum Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Giuliano Costa (G)

Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico - San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Marco Barbanti (M)

Università degli Studi di Enna "Kore", Enna, Italy.

Nicolas M Van Mieghem (NM)

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Damiano Regazzoli (D)

Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy.

Antonio Mangieri (A)

Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy.

Andrea Scotti (A)

Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

Azeem Latib (A)

Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

Francesco Saia (F)

Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, IRCCS University Hospital of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Francesco Bedogni (F)

Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Department, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.

Luca Testa (L)

Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Department, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: luctes@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH