A deep learning approach for cervical cord injury severity determination through axial and sagittal magnetic resonance imaging segmentation and classification.
Cervical spinal cord injury
Deep learning
MRI classification
Machine learning
Spinal cord injury
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Aug 2024
29 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
14
11
2023
accepted:
20
08
2024
revised:
30
07
2024
medline:
31
8
2024
pubmed:
31
8
2024
entrez:
28
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Cross-sectional Database Study. While the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale is the standard for assessing spinal cord injuries (SCI), it has limitations due to subjectivity and impracticality. Advances in machine learning (ML) and image recognition have spurred research into their use for outcome prediction. This study aims to analyze deep learning techniques for identifying and classifying cervical SCI severity from MRI scans. The study included patients with traumatic and nontraumatic cervical SCI admitted from 2019 to 2022. MRI images were labeled by two senior resident physicians. A deep convolutional neural network was trained using axial and sagittal cervical MRI images from the dataset. Model performance was assessed using Dice Score and IoU to measure segmentation accuracy by comparing predicted and ground truth masks. Classification accuracy was evaluated with the F1 Score, balancing false positives and negatives. In the axial spinal cord segmentation, we achieved a Dice score of 0.94 for and IoU score of 0.89. In the sagittal spinal cord segmentation, we obtained Dice score up to 0.9201 and IoU scores up to 0.8541. The model for axial image score classification gave a satisfactory result with an F1 score of 0.72 and AUC of 0.79. Our models successfully identified cervical SCI on T2-weighted MR images with satisfactory performance. Further research is needed to develop more advanced models for predicting patient outcomes in SCI cases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39198286
doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08464-7
pii: 10.1007/s00586-024-08464-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : AOSpine
ID : AOSEAR02205
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Alizadeh A, Dyck SM, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: An Overview of Pathophysiology, Models and Acute Injury Mechanisms. Front Neurol; 10. Epub ahead of print 22 March 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00282
Sezer N (2015) Chronic complications of spinal cord injury. World J Orthop 6:24
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.24
pubmed: 25621208
pmcid: 4303787
Soufi K, Nouri A, Martin AR (2022) Degenerative cervical myelopathy and spinal cord Injury: introduction to the Special Issue. J Clin Med 11:4253
doi: 10.3390/jcm11154253
pubmed: 35893344
pmcid: 9331834
Gündoğdu İ, Akyüz M, Öztürk EA et al (2014) Can spinal cord injury patients show a worsening in ASIA impairment scale classification despite actually having neurological improvement? The limitation of ASIA impairment scale classification. Spinal Cord 52:667–670
doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.89
pubmed: 24891005
Roberts TT, Leonard GR, Cepela DJ (2017) Classifications in brief: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:1499–1504
doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5133-4
pubmed: 27815685
Zhang Q, Du Y, Wei Z et al (2021) Spine Medical Image Segmentation based on deep learning. J Healthc Eng 2021:1–6
McCoy DB, Dupont SM, Gros C et al Convolutional Neural Network–Based Automated Segmentation of the Spinal Cord and Contusion Injury: Deep Learning Biomarker Correlates of Motor Impairment in Acute Spinal Cord Injury. American Journal of Neuroradiology. Epub ahead of print 28 March 2019. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6020
Tay B, Hyun JK, Oh S (2014) A Machine Learning Approach for Specification of Spinal Cord Injuries Using Fractional Anisotropy Values Obtained from Diffusion Tensor Images. Comput Math Methods Med; 2014: 1–8
Merali ZA, Colak E, Wilson JR (2021) Applications of machine learning to imaging of spinal disorders: current status and future directions. Global Spine J 11:23S–29S
doi: 10.1177/2192568220961353
pubmed: 33890805
pmcid: 8076811
Ren G, Yu K, Xie Z et al (2022) Current applications of machine learning in spine: from clinical view. Global Spine J 12:1827–1840
doi: 10.1177/21925682211035363
pubmed: 34628966
Gassenmaier S, Küstner T, Nickel D et al (2021) Deep learning applications in magnetic resonance imaging: has the future become Present? Diagnostics 11:2181
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122181
pubmed: 34943418
pmcid: 8700442
Kapoor D, Xu C (2023) Spinal cord Injury AIS predictions using machine learning. eNeuro 10:ENEURO0149–222022
doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0149-22.2022
Jin R, Luk KD, Cheung JPY et al Prognosis of cervical myelopathy based on diffusion tensor imaging with artificial intelligence methods. NMR Biomed; 32. Epub ahead of print 27 August 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4114
Kumar Y, Hayashi D (2016) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in acute spinal trauma: a pictorial review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:310
doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1169-6
pubmed: 27448661
pmcid: 4957861
Cohen-Adad J, Alonso-Ortiz E, Abramovic M et al (2021) Open-access quantitative MRI data of the spinal cord and reproducibility across participants, sites and manufacturers. Sci Data 8:219
doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00941-8
pubmed: 34400655
pmcid: 8368310
Jain Anil K (1989) Fundamentals of digital image processing. Prentice-Hall Inc.
Gros C, De Leener B, Badji A et al (2019) Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks. NeuroImage 184:901–915
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.081
pubmed: 30300751
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T, U-Net (2015) Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04597
He K, Zhang X, Ren S et al (2015) Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385
De Leener B, Cohen-Adad J, Kadoury S (2015) Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and spinal canal coupled with vertebral labeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34:1705–1718
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2437192
pubmed: 26011879
Chandra J, Sheerin F, Lopez de Heredia L et al (2012) MRI in acute and subacute post-traumatic spinal cord injury: pictorial review. Spinal Cord 50:2–7
doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.107
pubmed: 22064660
Haefeli J, Mabray MC, Whetstone WD et al (2017) Multivariate analysis of MRI biomarkers for Predicting neurologic impairment in cervical spinal cord Injury. Am J Neuroradiol 38:648–655
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5021
pubmed: 28007771
pmcid: 5671488
Tetreault LA, Skelly AC, Dettori JR et al (2017) Guidelines for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy and Acute spinal cord Injury: development process and methodology. Global Spine J 7:8S–20S
doi: 10.1177/2192568217701715
pubmed: 29164037
pmcid: 5684837
Fehlings MG, Rabin D, Sears W et al (2010) Current practice in the timing of Surgical intervention in spinal cord Injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:S166–S173
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f386f6
pubmed: 20881458
Cui Y, Zhu J, Duan Z et al (2022) Artificial Intelligence in spinal imaging: current status and future directions. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:11708
doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811708
pubmed: 36141981
pmcid: 9517575
S P, S A, A D, et al. Detection of Spinal Cord Injury using Deep Learning Algorithm. In: 2022 International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Data Communication Systems (ICSCDS). IEEE, pp. 270–275
Tidwell VK, Kim JH, Song S et al (2010) Automatic segmentation of rodent spinal cord diffusion MR images. Magn Reson Med 64:893–901
doi: 10.1002/mrm.22416
pubmed: 20564582
pmcid: 2932760
Mukherjee DP, Cheng I, Ray N et al (2010) Automatic segmentation of spinal cord MRI using symmetric boundary tracing. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 14:1275–1278
doi: 10.1109/TITB.2010.2052060
pubmed: 20529752
pmcid: 3038784
Dalkilic T, Fallah N, Noonan VK et al (2018) Predicting Injury Severity and neurological recovery after Acute Cervical spinal cord Injury: a comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid and magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers. J Neurotrauma 35:435–445
doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5357
pubmed: 29037121
Ren H, Feng T, Wang L et al Using a Combined Classification of Increased Signal Intensity on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to Predict Surgical Outcome in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Medical Science Monitor; 27. Epub ahead of print 30 November 2020. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.929417
Talbott JF, Whetstone WD, Readdy WJ et al (2015) The brain and Spinal Injury Center score: a novel, simple, and reproducible method for assessing the severity of acute cervical spinal cord injury with axial T2-weighted MRI findings. J Neurosurg Spine 23:495–504
doi: 10.3171/2015.1.SPINE141033
pubmed: 26161519
Parthiban J, Zileli M, Sharif SY (2020) Outcomes of spinal cord Injury: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations. Neurospine 17:809–819
doi: 10.14245/ns.2040490.245
pubmed: 33401858
pmcid: 7788418
Dobran M, Aiudi D, Liverotti V et al (2023) Prognostic MRI parameters in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Eur Spine J 32:1584–1590
doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07560-4
pubmed: 36882580
Kamal R, Verma H, Narasimhaiah S et al (2023) Predicting the Role of Preoperative Intramedullary Lesion Length and early decompressive surgery in ASIA Impairment Scale Grade Improvement following Subaxial traumatic cervical spinal cord Injury. J Neurol Surg Cent Eur Neurosurg 84:144–156
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740379
Mohajeri Moghaddam S, Bhatt AA (2018) Location, length, and enhancement: systematic approach to differentiating intramedullary spinal cord lesions. Insights Imaging 9:511–526
doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0608-3
pubmed: 29949034
pmcid: 6108975
Aarabi B, Sansur CA, Ibrahimi DM et al (2017) Intramedullary Lesion Length on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a strong predictor of ASIA Impairment Scale Grade Conversion following decompressive surgery in cervical spinal cord Injury. Neurosurgery 80:610–620
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw053
pubmed: 28362913
Shimizu T, Suda K, Maki S et al (2023) Efficacy of a machine learning-based approach in predicting neurological prognosis of cervical spinal cord injury patients following urgent surgery within 24 h after injury. J Clin Neurosci 107:150–156
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.11.003
pubmed: 36376152
Shanmuganathan K, Gullapalli RP, Zhuo J et al (2008) Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging in Cervical Spine Trauma. Am J Neuroradiol 29:655–659
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0916
pubmed: 18238846
pmcid: 7978215
Okimatsu S, Maki S, Furuya T et al (2022) Determining the short-term neurological prognosis for acute cervical spinal cord injury using machine learning. J Clin Neurosci 96:74–79
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.11.037
pubmed: 34998207
Yi W, Zhao J, Tang W et al (2023) Deep learning-based high-accuracy detection for lumbar and cervical degenerative disease on T2-weighted MR images. Eur Spine J 32:3807–3814
doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07641-4
pubmed: 36943484