Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation in Polish-speaking patients.
CRSwNP
Chronic rhinosinusitis
Quality of life
SNOT − 22
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Aug 2024
28 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
20
05
2024
accepted:
13
08
2024
medline:
31
8
2024
pubmed:
31
8
2024
entrez:
28
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
There are many specific instruments for assessing the quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Of all these tests, the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) is the most widely used internationally. The purpose of the study was linguistic adaptation and validation of the SNOT-22 scale in the Polish language. The SNOT-22 was adapted into Polish and was administered to 148 subjects (108 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and 40 asymptomatic controls. Seventy-one patients completed the SNOT-22 a second time to evaluate test-retest reliability. The Polish SNOT-22 was assessed for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity, criterion validity, and sensitivity and specificity. The Polish SNOT-22 exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. A high Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α = 0.89) was obtained. Significantly higher scores (p < 0.01) were revealed in the Study Group with a median score of 32 (range 15-53) points in comparison with controls: 5 (range 0-20). A moderate correlation was found between SNOT-22 and the Lund-Kennedy test score (r = 0.334; p < 0.001) and a strong correlation between SNOT-22 and the Lund-Macay test score (r = 0.469; p < 0.001). The best cut-off point was set at a 16 score with a sensitivity of 0.981 and a specificity of 0.995. The determined Area Under Curve (AUC = 0.997; p < 0.001) confirms the diagnostic accuracy of the Polish SNOT-22. The Polish version of the SNOT-22 is a valid and reliable tool for measuring health-related quality of life in patients with CRSwNP in the Polish-speaking population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39198305
doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08919-z
pii: 10.1007/s00405-024-08919-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C et al (2020) Executive summary of EPOS 2020 including integrated care pathways. Rhinology 58:82–111. https://doi.org/10.4193/RHIN20.601
doi: 10.4193/RHIN20.601
pubmed: 32226949
Mamat Nasir MSN, Aziz ME, Tuan Sharif SE et al (2022) Clinical symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic) are related to sinus computed tomography but not to endoscopic findings. Acta Otorrinolaringol (English Ed 73:203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otoeng.2021.03.004
doi: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2021.03.004
Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J et al (2012) EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinol J 50:1–12. https://doi.org/10.4193/rhino12.000
doi: 10.4193/rhino12.000
DeConde AS, Soler ZM (2016) Chronic rhinosinusitis: epidemiology and burden of disease. Am J Rhinol Allergy 30:134–139. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4297
doi: 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4297
pubmed: 26980394
Koskinen A, Hammarén-Malmi S, Myller J et al (2021) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test (snot)-22 for Finnish patients. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 278:405–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06297-w
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06297-w
Palmer JN, Messina JC, Biletch R et al (2019) A cross-sectional, population-based survey of U.S. adults with symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis. Allergy Asthma Proc 40:48–56. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2019.40.4182
doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4182
pubmed: 30582496
Bachert C, Pawankar R, Zhang L et al (2014) ICON: chronic rhinosinusitis. World Allergy Organ J. 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-4551-7-25
doi: 10.1186/1939-4551-7-25
pubmed: 25379119
pmcid: 4213581
Sedaghat AR, Kuan EC, Scadding GK (2022) Epidemiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: prevalence and risk factors. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 10:1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2022.01.016
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.01.016
pubmed: 35092822
Georgalas C, Cornet M, Adriaensen G et al (2014) Evidence-based surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-014-0427-7
Book R, Eligal S, Tal Y, Eliashar R (2023) Biological Treatment for Uncontrolled Chronic Rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: preliminary real-world results from a Tertiary Medical Center. J Clin Med 12:4–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113671
doi: 10.3390/jcm12113671
Cergan R, Berghi ON, Dumitru M et al (2023) Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis—A modern option for Therapy. Life 13:2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13112165
doi: 10.3390/life13112165
pubmed: 38004305
pmcid: 10672088
Rank MA, Wonnaparhown AM, Freeman CM (2023) Recent guidelines addressing chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: practical aspects. Pol Arch Intern Med 133. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.16611
Rudmik L, Hopkins C, Peters A et al (2015) Patient-reported outcome measures for adult chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and quality assessment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 136:1532–1540e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.012
pubmed: 26654198
Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R et al (2009) Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol 34:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x
pubmed: 19793277
Shapira Galitz Y, Halperin D, Bavnik Y, Warman M (2016) Sino-nasal outcome Test-22: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and Validation in Hebrew-speaking patients. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg (United States) 154:951–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816629378
doi: 10.1177/0194599816629378
Khan IM, Mohamad S, Ansari S, Calder N (2015) Should average SNOT 22 scores be calculated regionally? Acta Otolaryngol 36:106–108. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2015.1087048
doi: 10.3109/00016489.2015.1087048
Adnane C, Adouly T, Oubahmane T et al (2016) Psychometric validation of a Moroccan version of the 22-Item sino-nasal outcome test. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg (United States) 155:681–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816650477
doi: 10.1177/0194599816650477
Albrecht T, Beule AG, Hildenbrand T et al (2021) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) in german-speaking patients: a prospective, multicenter cohort study. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07019-6 . Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Kosugi EM, Chen VG, da Fonseca VMG et al (2011) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of sinonasal outcome test (SNOT)-22 to Brazilian Portuguese. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 77:663–669. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000500021
doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942011000500021
pubmed: 22030978
de Dorlodot C, Horoi M, Lefebvre P et al (2015) French adaptation and validation of the sino-nasal outcome Test-22: a prospective cohort study on quality of life among 422 subjects. Clin Otolaryngol 40:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12315
doi: 10.1111/coa.12315
pubmed: 25269784
Asiri M, Alokby G (2019) Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 for the Arabian Patient Population. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4447 . Cureus 20:
Mozzanica F, Preti A, Gera R et al (2017) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the SNOT-22 into Italian. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 274:887–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4313-x
doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4313-x
Caminha GP, De Melo JT, Hopkins C et al (2012) SNOT-22: psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation into the Portuguese language spoken in Brazil. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 78:34–39. https://doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20120030
doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20120030
pubmed: 23306565
Lachanas VA, Tsea M, Tsiouvaka S et al (2014) The sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT)-22: validation for Greek patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:2723–2728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-2969-7
doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-2969-7
pubmed: 24595707
Vaitkus S, Padervinskis E, Balsevicius T et al (2013) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT)-22 for Lithuanian patients. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 270:1843–1848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2282-2
doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2282-2
de los Santos G, Reyes P, del Castillo R et al (2015) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22) for spanish-speaking patients. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 272:3335–3340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3437-0
doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3437-0
Schalek P, Otruba L, Hahn A (2010) Quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a validation of the Czech version of SNOT-22 questionnaire. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 267:473–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1180-8
doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1180-8
Fokkens WJ, Viskens AS, Backer V et al (2023) EPOS/EUFOREA update on indication and evaluation of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps 2023. Rhinology 61:194–202. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin22.489
doi: 10.4193/Rhin22.489
pubmed: 36999780
Hopkins C, Browne JP, Slack R et al (2007) The Lund-Mackay staging system for chronic rhinosinusitis: how is it used and what does it predict? Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg 137:555–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2007.02.004
doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.02.004
pubmed: 17903570
Wild D, Grove A, Martin M et al (2005) Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Heal 8:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
Cook DA, Beckman TJ (2006) Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med 119:166. .e7-166.e16
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036
de Hond AAH, Steyerberg EW, van Calster B (2022) Interpreting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Lancet Digit Heal 4:e853–e855. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00188-1
doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00188-1
Morley AD, Sharp HR (2006) A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best? Clin Otolaryngol 31:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01155.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01155.x
pubmed: 16620328
Plaas M, Kasenomm P (2019) The sino-nasal outcome Test-22: translation and validation in an Estonian population. Rhinol Online 2:87–90. https://doi.org/10.4193/rhinol/19.016
doi: 10.4193/rhinol/19.016
Alanazy F, Al Dousary S, Albosaily A et al (2018) Psychometric arabic sino-nasal outcome Test-22: validation and translation in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Ann Saudi Med 38:22–27. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2018.22
doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2018.22
pubmed: 29419525
pmcid: 6074183
Cakir Cetin A, Kumus O, Keskinoglu P et al (2019) Turkish validation of the sino-nasal outcome Test-22. Clin Otolaryngol 44:557–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13332
doi: 10.1111/coa.13332
pubmed: 30891883
Jalessi M, Farhadi M, Kamrava SK et al (2013) The reliability and validity of the persian version of sinonasal outcome test 22 (SNOT 22) questionnaires. Iran Red Crescent Med J 15:404–408. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.7937
doi: 10.5812/ircmj.7937
pubmed: 24349728
pmcid: 3838650
Lange B, Thilsing T, Al-Kalemji A et al (2011) The sino-nasal outcome test 22 validated for Danish patients. Dan Med Bull 58
Misirovs R, Chan R, Lipworth B (2023) 5-Item sino-nasal outcome test and 22-item sino-nasal outcome test relationship with endoscopic and radiologic scores in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 000:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2023.11.011
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.11.011
Gallo S, Russo F, Mozzanica F et al (2020) Prognostic value of the sinonasal outcome test 22 (SNOT-22) in chronic rhinosinusitis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 40:113–121. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N0364
doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N0364
pubmed: 32469005
pmcid: 7256904
Farhood Z, Schlosser RJ, Pearse ME et al (2016) Twenty-two-item sino-nasal outcome test in a control population: a cross-sectional study and systematic review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6:271–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21668
doi: 10.1002/alr.21668
pubmed: 26610073
Gillett S, Hopkins C, Slack R, Browne JP (2009) A pilot study of the SNOT 22 score in adults with no sinonasal disease. Clin Otolaryngol 34:467–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01975.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01975.x
pubmed: 19793280
Brooks SG, Trope M, Blasetti M et al (2018) Preoperative Lund-Mackay computed tomography score is associated with preoperative symptom severity and predicts quality-of-life outcome trajectories after sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 8:668–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22109
doi: 10.1002/alr.22109
pubmed: 29517156
pmcid: 5995576
Bradley DT, Kountakis SE (2005) Correlation between computed tomography scores and symptomatic improvement after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 115:466–469. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000157840.55659.62
doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000157840.55659.62
pubmed: 15744159