Perinatal Outcomes of Singleton, Twin and Triplet Gestations after Oocyte Donation: A Retrospective, Population-Based Cohort Analysis.
oocyte donation
pregnancy-induced hypertension
preterm birth
small for gestational age
Journal
Children (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9067
Titre abrégé: Children (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648936
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Aug 2024
10 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
01
07
2024
revised:
28
07
2024
accepted:
08
08
2024
medline:
31
8
2024
pubmed:
31
8
2024
entrez:
29
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although high live birth rates are associated with oocyte donation (OD), these pregnancies are associated with increased obstetric and perinatal risks. This study evaluated maternal and neonatal risks after OD compared to in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous oocytes, and to spontaneous pregnancies (SPs), among singletons, twins and triplets. A retrospective, large, population-based cohort study was conducted based on electronic data from Maccabi Healthcare Services. A total of 469,134 pregnancies were grouped according to the mode of conception. The main outcome measures were preterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA) and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH). The data were analyzed separately for singletons, twins and triplets. The mean maternal age was older in the OD group compared with the IVF and SP groups (singletons: 39.7 ± 4.1 vs. 34.5 ± 4.8 and 31.7 ± 5.3 years; twins: 39 ± 4.6 vs. 32.6 ± 4.4 and 31.2 ± 5.1 years; and triplets: 35.6 ± 2.5 vs. 32 ± 3.9 and 29.7 ± 5 years). The mean gestational age was younger among the OD group compared to the SP group (singletons: 37.5 ± 3 vs. 39 ± 2 OD pregnancies are at increased risk for PTB, SGA and PIH.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
Although high live birth rates are associated with oocyte donation (OD), these pregnancies are associated with increased obstetric and perinatal risks. This study evaluated maternal and neonatal risks after OD compared to in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous oocytes, and to spontaneous pregnancies (SPs), among singletons, twins and triplets.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective, large, population-based cohort study was conducted based on electronic data from Maccabi Healthcare Services. A total of 469,134 pregnancies were grouped according to the mode of conception. The main outcome measures were preterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA) and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH). The data were analyzed separately for singletons, twins and triplets.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean maternal age was older in the OD group compared with the IVF and SP groups (singletons: 39.7 ± 4.1 vs. 34.5 ± 4.8 and 31.7 ± 5.3 years; twins: 39 ± 4.6 vs. 32.6 ± 4.4 and 31.2 ± 5.1 years; and triplets: 35.6 ± 2.5 vs. 32 ± 3.9 and 29.7 ± 5 years). The mean gestational age was younger among the OD group compared to the SP group (singletons: 37.5 ± 3 vs. 39 ± 2
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
OD pregnancies are at increased risk for PTB, SGA and PIH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39201897
pii: children11080962
doi: 10.3390/children11080962
pmc: PMC11353069
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec 1;34(12):2533-2540
pubmed: 31750511
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:107-12
pubmed: 25268777
Hum Reprod. 1992 Jun;7 Suppl 1:85-8
pubmed: 1447373
Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Feb;12(2):153-62
pubmed: 16478577
Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):948-953.e1
pubmed: 28283263
Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Mar 1;25(2):137-158
pubmed: 30753453
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Aug;41(2):309-315
pubmed: 32576492
Transpl Immunol. 2011 Sep;25(2-3):89-95
pubmed: 21708252
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):87-104
pubmed: 23154145
JAMA. 2013 Dec 11;310(22):2426-34
pubmed: 24135860
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Sep;22(5):620-33
pubmed: 27271097
Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):704-12
pubmed: 20543201
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):440-9
pubmed: 27006004
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5926470
pubmed: 29234680
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):328-39
pubmed: 26627731
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Oct;36(10):2017-2037
pubmed: 31440959
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jan;70:81-91
pubmed: 32741624
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Sep;35(3):318-324
pubmed: 28687207
Hum Reprod. 2009 Oct;24(10):2500-3
pubmed: 19581283
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Apr;35(4):314-319
pubmed: 30626251
Fertil Steril. 2013 May;99(6):1637-43
pubmed: 23465822
Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep 1;106(3):541-6
pubmed: 27301796
Fertil Steril. 2011 Apr;95(5):1645-9.e1
pubmed: 21130432
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4 Suppl):S53-69
pubmed: 26428503
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Jan;42(1):185-206
pubmed: 33191131
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 28;8(11):
pubmed: 31661864
Hum Reprod. 1998 Feb;13(2):483-90
pubmed: 9557862
BJOG. 2017 Mar;124(4):561-572
pubmed: 27592694
Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 May;7(5):311-4
pubmed: 15909464
Hum Reprod. 2002 Oct;17(10):2636-40
pubmed: 12351541
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;116(6):1387-1392
pubmed: 21099607