Research Quality of Clinical Trials Reported for Foods with Function Claims in Japan, 2023-2024: Evaluation Based on a Revised Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials.
clinical trial
functionality
healthy food
randomized controlled trial
risk of bias
Journal
Nutrients
ISSN: 2072-6643
Titre abrégé: Nutrients
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101521595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Aug 2024
17 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
12
07
2024
revised:
14
08
2024
accepted:
16
08
2024
medline:
1
9
2024
pubmed:
31
8
2024
entrez:
29
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Foods with Function Claim was introduced in Japan in April 2015 to make more products available that are labeled with health functions. A product's functionality of function claims must be explained by the scientific evidence presented in clinical trials (CTs) or systematic reviews, but the quality of recent CTs is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of bias (RoB) using "a revised tool to assess risk (RoB 2)" published in 2018 for notifications based on all recent CTs published on the Consumer Affairs Agency website. A total of 38 submitted papers based on CTs that were published on the Consumer Affairs Agency website during the period from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2024 were eligible. The RoB 2 tool provides a framework for considering the risk of bias in the findings of any type of randomized trial. This tool with five domains was used to evaluate the quality of research methods. Eligible CTs were assessed as "low risk" (11%, Overall, the quality of the latest CTs submitted after 2023 was very low, occurring in all five domains, and was most serious for "bias in selection of the reported result (Domain 5)".
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Foods with Function Claim was introduced in Japan in April 2015 to make more products available that are labeled with health functions. A product's functionality of function claims must be explained by the scientific evidence presented in clinical trials (CTs) or systematic reviews, but the quality of recent CTs is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of bias (RoB) using "a revised tool to assess risk (RoB 2)" published in 2018 for notifications based on all recent CTs published on the Consumer Affairs Agency website.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 38 submitted papers based on CTs that were published on the Consumer Affairs Agency website during the period from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2024 were eligible. The RoB 2 tool provides a framework for considering the risk of bias in the findings of any type of randomized trial. This tool with five domains was used to evaluate the quality of research methods.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eligible CTs were assessed as "low risk" (11%,
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, the quality of the latest CTs submitted after 2023 was very low, occurring in all five domains, and was most serious for "bias in selection of the reported result (Domain 5)".
Identifiants
pubmed: 39203880
pii: nu16162744
doi: 10.3390/nu16162744
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Ministry of Edu-cation, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
ID : 24K14658