Phenotyping patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea with persistent objective impaired alertness or subjective sleepiness.

Alertness Epworth sleepiness scale Maintenance of wakefulness test Obstructive sleep apnea Residual sleepiness Vigilance

Journal

Sleep medicine
ISSN: 1878-5506
Titre abrégé: Sleep Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100898759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 12 06 2024
revised: 27 07 2024
accepted: 01 08 2024
medline: 31 8 2024
pubmed: 31 8 2024
entrez: 29 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with accidental and economic burden, as well as cardiovascular risk. Despite OSA treatment, 10-28 % of patients report residual sleepiness. Its determinants, as well as those of objective impaired alertness remain poorly known. In this study, we investigated factors associated with residual subjective sleepiness and objective impaired alertness in patients treated for OSA. Consecutive OSA treated patients referred for maintenance of wakefulness tests (MWT) at a tertiary university center were recruited between 2017 and 2020. Clinical data and polysomnography parameters were compared between patients with vs without subjective sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, ESS≥11) and those with vs without impaired alertness (at least one trial with sleep onset on MWT). A multivariate logistic model was used to assess explanatory variables of MWT and ESS results. We included 141 patients, of whom 12.8 % had both subjective sleepiness and objective impaired alertness, 17.7 % objective impaired alertness only and 9.2 % subjective sleepiness only. Self-reported history of car accident/near miss, smoking history and ESS≥11 were significantly associated with objective impaired alertness whereas residual Apnea-hypopnea Index and CPAP use were not. The only significant variable associated with ESS at the time of MWT evaluation was initial ESS. Patients with objective impaired alertness only were more often smokers (52 % vs 19 %, p = 0.01), had a higher body mass index (BMI) (32 vs 29 kg/m More than one third of OSA treated patients referred for MWT have objective impaired alertness and/or subjective sleepiness. Our findings highlight the need for a comprehensive medical assessment including accident history, subjective sleepiness and comorbidities. Particular attention should be paid to smoking patients with high BMI, who are at risk of impaired alertness with no report of subjective sleepiness.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with accidental and economic burden, as well as cardiovascular risk. Despite OSA treatment, 10-28 % of patients report residual sleepiness. Its determinants, as well as those of objective impaired alertness remain poorly known. In this study, we investigated factors associated with residual subjective sleepiness and objective impaired alertness in patients treated for OSA.
METHODS METHODS
Consecutive OSA treated patients referred for maintenance of wakefulness tests (MWT) at a tertiary university center were recruited between 2017 and 2020. Clinical data and polysomnography parameters were compared between patients with vs without subjective sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, ESS≥11) and those with vs without impaired alertness (at least one trial with sleep onset on MWT). A multivariate logistic model was used to assess explanatory variables of MWT and ESS results.
RESULTS RESULTS
We included 141 patients, of whom 12.8 % had both subjective sleepiness and objective impaired alertness, 17.7 % objective impaired alertness only and 9.2 % subjective sleepiness only. Self-reported history of car accident/near miss, smoking history and ESS≥11 were significantly associated with objective impaired alertness whereas residual Apnea-hypopnea Index and CPAP use were not. The only significant variable associated with ESS at the time of MWT evaluation was initial ESS. Patients with objective impaired alertness only were more often smokers (52 % vs 19 %, p = 0.01), had a higher body mass index (BMI) (32 vs 29 kg/m
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
More than one third of OSA treated patients referred for MWT have objective impaired alertness and/or subjective sleepiness. Our findings highlight the need for a comprehensive medical assessment including accident history, subjective sleepiness and comorbidities. Particular attention should be paid to smoking patients with high BMI, who are at risk of impaired alertness with no report of subjective sleepiness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39208521
pii: S1389-9457(24)00356-3
doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.08.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

221-229

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Renaud Tamisier reports receiving lecture fees from ResMed, Inspire and Bioprojet and grant support through his institution from ResMed, Inspire, Agiradom and Bioprojet, and travel grants from Agiradom. Laure Peter-Derex reports receiving lecture fees from Bioprojet, Eisai, Zogenix and Roche, grant support through her institution from Asten Santé, Linde and Bioprojet, and travel grants from Bioprojet and Vitalaire. All other authors declare no competing interests related to this work.

Auteurs

Pierre Tankéré (P)

Center for Sleep Medicine, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Grenoble Alpes University, HP2 Laboratory (Hypoxia Pathophysiology), INSERM U1300 Grenoble, France; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, PAM Team, INSERM U1028 / CNRS UMR 5292 / Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.

Jacques Taillard (J)

Sommeil, Addiction et Neuropsychiatrie, Université de Bordeaux, SANPSY, USR 3413, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.

Emeric Stauffer (E)

Center for Sleep Medicine, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Laboratory LIBM EA7424, Team Vascular Biology and Red Blood Cell, University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Thierry Petitjean (T)

Center for Sleep Medicine, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.

Christian Berthomier (C)

Physip, Paris, France.

Mélanie Strauss (M)

Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), CUB Hôpital Érasme, Services de Neurologie, Psychiatrie et laboratoire du sommeil, Brussells, Belgium; Neuropsychology and Functional Imaging Research Group (UR2NF), Center for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences and ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

Renaud Tamisier (R)

Grenoble Alpes University, HP2 Laboratory (Hypoxia Pathophysiology), INSERM U1300 Grenoble, France; Grenoble University Hospital, Department of Physiology, Sleep Laboratory, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble, Cedex 9, France.

Laure Peter-Derex (L)

Center for Sleep Medicine, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, PAM Team, INSERM U1028 / CNRS UMR 5292 / Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France. Electronic address: laure.peter-derex@chu-lyon.fr.

Classifications MeSH