Left ventricular electrical delay predicts volumetric response to leadless Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Electrical latency cardiac resynchronization therapy endocardial pacing heart failure leadless pacing

Journal

Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 24 05 2024
revised: 08 08 2024
accepted: 21 08 2024
medline: 31 8 2024
pubmed: 31 8 2024
entrez: 29 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Leadless left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing is an emerging cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) technology. Predictors of response to leadless CRT are poorly understood. Implanting the LV endocardial pacing electrode in sites with increased electrical latency (Q-LV) may improve response rates. To examine the association between Q-LV and echocardiographic remodelling response to leadless CRT delivered with the WiSE-CRT system. A post-hoc analysis (n=122) of the SOLVE-CRT trial examined the relationship between LV pacing site Q-LV with rate of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduction >15% at 6 months. Multivariable regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, prior CRT non-response, cardiomyopathy aetiology, QRS morphology and QRS duration was performed, followed by ROC analysis and analysis of variance by Q-LV quartile. A subgroup analysis of the ischaemic cardiomyopathy cohort was undertaken. Complete Q-LV data was available in 122/153 (80%) of patients in the active arms SOLVE-CRT. Overall, the 6-month LVESV response rate was 46%. Logistic regression identified Q-LV as an independent response predictor with borderline significance (adjusted odds ratio 1.015, p=0.05). Analysis by Q-LV quartile demonstrated a significant improvement in response rate in quartile 4 (longest Q-LV, 64%) compared to quartile 1 (shortest Q-LV, 28%), p<0.01. This association was primarily driven by strong Q-LV-response correlation in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, demonstrated by subgroup logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio 1.034, p=0.004). Increased Q-LV was associated with improved reverse remodelling following leadless CRT. Targeting LV endocardial sites of high Q-LV may deliver additional benefit compared to empirical LV electrode implantation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Leadless left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing is an emerging cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) technology. Predictors of response to leadless CRT are poorly understood. Implanting the LV endocardial pacing electrode in sites with increased electrical latency (Q-LV) may improve response rates.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To examine the association between Q-LV and echocardiographic remodelling response to leadless CRT delivered with the WiSE-CRT system.
METHODS METHODS
A post-hoc analysis (n=122) of the SOLVE-CRT trial examined the relationship between LV pacing site Q-LV with rate of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduction >15% at 6 months. Multivariable regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, prior CRT non-response, cardiomyopathy aetiology, QRS morphology and QRS duration was performed, followed by ROC analysis and analysis of variance by Q-LV quartile. A subgroup analysis of the ischaemic cardiomyopathy cohort was undertaken.
RESULTS RESULTS
Complete Q-LV data was available in 122/153 (80%) of patients in the active arms SOLVE-CRT. Overall, the 6-month LVESV response rate was 46%. Logistic regression identified Q-LV as an independent response predictor with borderline significance (adjusted odds ratio 1.015, p=0.05). Analysis by Q-LV quartile demonstrated a significant improvement in response rate in quartile 4 (longest Q-LV, 64%) compared to quartile 1 (shortest Q-LV, 28%), p<0.01. This association was primarily driven by strong Q-LV-response correlation in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, demonstrated by subgroup logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio 1.034, p=0.004).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Increased Q-LV was associated with improved reverse remodelling following leadless CRT. Targeting LV endocardial sites of high Q-LV may deliver additional benefit compared to empirical LV electrode implantation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39209224
pii: S1547-5271(24)03268-5
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.08.050
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Nadeev Wijesuriya (N)

King's College London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: nadeev.wijesuriya@kcl.ac.uk.

Vishal Mehta (V)

King's College London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Felicity De Vere (F)

King's College London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Sandra Howell (S)

King's College London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Nilanka Mannakkara (N)

King's College London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Baldeep Sidhu (B)

King's College London, UK.

Mark Elliott (M)

King's College London, UK.

Paolo Bosco (P)

Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Prashanthan Sanders (P)

University of Adelaide, Australia.

Jagmeet P Singh (JP)

Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Mary Norine Walsh (MN)

Ascension St. Vincent Heart Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Steven A Niederer (SA)

King's College London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK; Alan Turing Institute, London, UK.

Christopher A Rinaldi (CA)

King's College London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH