Outcomes following TAVR in patients with cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aortic stenosis Aortic valvular disease Cardiogenic shock Mortality TAVR Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Journal

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
ISSN: 1878-0938
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Revasc Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 02 03 2024
revised: 25 07 2024
accepted: 12 08 2024
medline: 31 8 2024
pubmed: 31 8 2024
entrez: 29 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

While transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has broadened treatment options for critically ill patients, outcomes among those with concomitant cardiogenic shock (CS) are not well-explored. We conducted a comprehensive search of major databases for studies comparing outcomes following TAVR in patients with and without CS since inception up to October 31, 2023. Our meta-analysis included five non-randomized observational. Dichotomous outcomes were assessed using the Mantel-Haenszel method (risk ratio, 95 % CI), and continuous outcomes were evaluated using mean difference and 95 % CI with the inverse variance method. Statistical heterogeneity was determined using the inconsistency test (I Among 26,283 patients across five studies, 30-day mortality was higher in the CS group (7267 patients; 27.6 %) compared to those without CS (OR 3.41, 95 % CI [2.01, 5.76], p < 0.01), as well as 30-day major vascular complications (OR 1.72, 95 % CI [1.54, 1.92], p < 0.01). At 1-year follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between the compared groups (OR 2.68, 95 % CI [0.53, 13.46], p = 0.12). No significant between-group differences were observed in the likelihood of 30-day aortic valve reintervention (OR 3.20, 95 % CI [0.63, 16.22], p = 0.09) or post-TAVR aortic insufficiency (OR 0.91, 95 % CI [0.33, 2.51], p = 0.73). Furthermore, 30-day stroke, pacemaker implantation, and in-hospital major bleeding were comparable between both cohorts. Among patients undergoing TAVR, short-term mortality is higher but one-year outcomes are similar when comparing those with, to those without, CS. Future studies should examine whether TAVR outcomes are improved when the procedure is delayed to optimize CS and when delay is not possible, whether particular management strategies lead to more favorable periprocedural outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
While transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has broadened treatment options for critically ill patients, outcomes among those with concomitant cardiogenic shock (CS) are not well-explored.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive search of major databases for studies comparing outcomes following TAVR in patients with and without CS since inception up to October 31, 2023. Our meta-analysis included five non-randomized observational. Dichotomous outcomes were assessed using the Mantel-Haenszel method (risk ratio, 95 % CI), and continuous outcomes were evaluated using mean difference and 95 % CI with the inverse variance method. Statistical heterogeneity was determined using the inconsistency test (I
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 26,283 patients across five studies, 30-day mortality was higher in the CS group (7267 patients; 27.6 %) compared to those without CS (OR 3.41, 95 % CI [2.01, 5.76], p < 0.01), as well as 30-day major vascular complications (OR 1.72, 95 % CI [1.54, 1.92], p < 0.01). At 1-year follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between the compared groups (OR 2.68, 95 % CI [0.53, 13.46], p = 0.12). No significant between-group differences were observed in the likelihood of 30-day aortic valve reintervention (OR 3.20, 95 % CI [0.63, 16.22], p = 0.09) or post-TAVR aortic insufficiency (OR 0.91, 95 % CI [0.33, 2.51], p = 0.73). Furthermore, 30-day stroke, pacemaker implantation, and in-hospital major bleeding were comparable between both cohorts.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Among patients undergoing TAVR, short-term mortality is higher but one-year outcomes are similar when comparing those with, to those without, CS. Future studies should examine whether TAVR outcomes are improved when the procedure is delayed to optimize CS and when delay is not possible, whether particular management strategies lead to more favorable periprocedural outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39209579
pii: S1553-8389(24)00622-5
doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.08.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Auteurs

Ahmad Jabri (A)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, William Beaumont University Hospital, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

Mohammed Ayyad (M)

Department of Internal Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical school, Newark, NJ, USA.

Maram Albandak (M)

Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Ahmad Al-Abdouh (A)

Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Luai Madanat (L)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, William Beaumont University Hospital, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

Basma Badrawy Khalefa (BB)

Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Laith Alhuneafat (L)

Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Asem Ayyad (A)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Alejandro Lemor (A)

Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.

Mohammed Mhanna (M)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Iowa, IA, USA.

Zaid Al Jebaje (Z)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Raef Fadel (R)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Pedro Engel Gonzalez (PE)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Brian O'Neill (B)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Rodrigo Bagur (R)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, Canada Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Ivan D Hanson (ID)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, William Beaumont University Hospital, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

Amr E Abbas (AE)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, William Beaumont University Hospital, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

Tiberio Frisoli (T)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

James Lee (J)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Dee Dee Wang (DD)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Vikas Aggarwal (V)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Khaldoon Alaswad (K)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

William W O'Neill (WW)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Herbert D Aronow (HD)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Mohammad AlQarqaz (M)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Pedro Villablanca (P)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address: pvillab1@hfhs.org.

Classifications MeSH