Plant diversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality via multitrophic diversity.


Journal

Nature ecology & evolution
ISSN: 2397-334X
Titre abrégé: Nat Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698577

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 25 03 2024
accepted: 24 07 2024
medline: 31 8 2024
pubmed: 31 8 2024
entrez: 29 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Ecosystem functioning depends on biodiversity at multiple trophic levels, yet relationships between multitrophic diversity and ecosystem multifunctionality have been poorly explored, with studies often focusing on individual trophic levels and functions and on specific ecosystem types. Here, we show that plant diversity can affect ecosystem functioning both directly and by affecting other trophic levels. Using data on 13 trophic groups and 13 ecosystem functions from two large biodiversity experiments-one representing temperate grasslands and the other subtropical forests-we found that plant diversity increases multifunctionality through elevated multitrophic diversity. Across both experiments, the association between multitrophic diversity and multifunctionality was stronger than the relationship between the diversity of individual trophic groups and multifunctionality. Our results also suggest that the role of multitrophic diversity is greater in forests than in grasslands. These findings imply that, to promote sustained ecosystem multifunctionality, conservation planning must consider the diversity of both plants and higher trophic levels.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39209981
doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02517-2
pii: 10.1038/s41559-024-02517-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS)
ID : 2023019
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 32301337
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : DFG FOR 5281, DFG GRK 2324
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : DFG FOR 5000
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : DFG FZT 118, 202548816
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : DFG FOR 891 and FOR 5281, DFG GRK 2324

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Références

Ritchie, H. & Roser, M. Land use. Our World in Data https://ourworldindata.org/land-use (2019).
Anthony, M. A., Bender, S. F. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Enumerating soil biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2304663120 (2023).
pubmed: 37549278 pmcid: 10437432 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2304663120
Sachs, J. D., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G. & Woelm, F. Sustainable Development Report 2022 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Jaureguiberry, P. et al. The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm9982 (2022).
pubmed: 36351024 pmcid: 9645725 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm9982
Bongaarts, J. The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Summary for Policymakers (IPBES, 2019).
Fijen, T. P. et al. Insect pollination is at least as important for marketable crop yield as plant quality in a seed crop. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1704–1713 (2018).
pubmed: 30189466 doi: 10.1111/ele.13150
Dainese, M. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax0121 (2019).
pubmed: 31663019 pmcid: 6795509 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax0121
Eisenhauer, N. et al. Ecosystem consequences of invertebrate decline. Curr. Biol. 33, 4538–4547 (2023).
pubmed: 37757832 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.09.012
Wang, S. & Brose, U. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in food webs: the vertical diversity hypothesis. Ecol. Lett. 21, 9–20 (2018).
pubmed: 29057554 doi: 10.1111/ele.12865
Poisot, T., Mouquet, N. & Gravel, D. Trophic complementarity drives the biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationship in food webs. Ecol. Lett. 16, 853–861 (2013).
pubmed: 23692591 doi: 10.1111/ele.12118
Albert, G., Gauzens, B., Loreau, M., Wang, S. & Brose, U. The hidden role of multi‐trophic interactions in driving diversity–productivity relationships. Ecol. Lett. 25, 405–415 (2022).
pubmed: 34846785 doi: 10.1111/ele.13935
Thébault, E. & Loreau, M. Food-web constraints on biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14949–14954 (2003).
pubmed: 14638942 pmcid: 299858 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2434847100
de Mazancourt, C., Loreau, M. & Abbadie, L. Grazing optimization and nutrient cycling: when do herbivores enhance plant production? Ecology 79, 2242–2252 (1998).
doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2242:GOANCW]2.0.CO;2
Symstad, A. J. & Tilman, D. Diversity loss, recruitment limitation, and ecosystem functioning: lessons learned from a removal experiment. Oikos 92, 424–435 (2001).
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.920304.x
Allan, E. et al. A comparison of the strength of biodiversity effects across multiple functions. Oecologia 173, 223–237 (2013).
pubmed: 23386044 doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2589-0
Duffy, J. E. Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning. Ecol. Lett. 6, 680–687 (2003).
doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00494.x
Naeem, S. & Li, S. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390, 507–509 (1997).
doi: 10.1038/37348
Mulder, C. P. H., Huss-Danell, K., Högberg, P. & Joshi, J. Insects affect relationships between plant species richness and ecosystem processes. Ecol. Lett. 2, 237–246 (1999).
doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00070.x
Brose, U. & Hillebrand, H. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic landscapes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150267 (2016).
pubmed: 27114570 pmcid: 4843689 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0267
Balvanera, P. et al. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1146–1156 (2006).
pubmed: 16972878 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x
Huang, Y. et al. Impacts of species richness on productivity in a large-scale subtropical forest experiment. Science 362, 80–83 (2018).
pubmed: 30287660 doi: 10.1126/science.aat6405
Schuldt, A. et al. Biodiversity across trophic levels drives multifunctionality in highly diverse forests. Nat. Commun. 9, 2989 (2018).
pubmed: 30065285 pmcid: 6068104 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05421-z
Hautier, Y. et al. Local loss and spatial homogenization of plant diversity reduce ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 50–56 (2018).
pubmed: 29203922 doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0395-0
Soliveres, S. et al. Biodiversity at multiple trophic levels is needed for ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 536, 456–459 (2016).
pubmed: 27533038 doi: 10.1038/nature19092
Seibold, S. et al. Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. Nature 574, 671–674 (2019).
pubmed: 31666721 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3
Tilman, D., Lehman, C. L. & Thomson, K. T. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1857–1861 (1997).
pubmed: 11038606 pmcid: 20007 doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1857
Laforest-Lapointe, I., Paquette, A., Messier, C. & Kembel, S. W. Leaf bacterial diversity mediates plant diversity and ecosystem function relationships. Nature 546, 145–147 (2017).
pubmed: 28538736 doi: 10.1038/nature22399
Li, Y. et al. Multitrophic arthropod diversity mediates tree diversity effects on primary productivity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 832–840 (2023).
pubmed: 37106157 doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02049-1
Buzhdygan, O. Y. et al. Biodiversity increases multitrophic energy use efficiency, flow and storage in grasslands. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 393–405 (2020).
pubmed: 32094542 doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1123-8
Meyer, S. T. et al. Biodiversity–multifunctionality relationships depend on identity and number of measured functions. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 44–49 (2018).
pubmed: 29180710 doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0391-4
Weisser, W. W. et al. Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning in a 15-year grassland experiment: patterns, mechanisms, and open questions. Basic Appl. Ecol. 23, 1–73 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2017.06.002
Bruelheide, H. et al. Designing forest biodiversity experiments: general considerations illustrated by a new large experiment in subtropical China. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 74–89 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12126
Maestre, F. T. et al. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335, 214–218 (2012).
pubmed: 22246775 pmcid: 3558739 doi: 10.1126/science.1215442
Schuldt, A. et al. Multiple plant diversity components drive consumer communities across ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 10, 1460 (2019).
pubmed: 30926809 pmcid: 6440984 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09448-8
Scherber, C. et al. Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature 468, 553–556 (2010).
pubmed: 20981010 doi: 10.1038/nature09492
McQueen, D. J., Post, J. R. & Mills, E. L. Trophic relationships in freshwater pelagic ecosystems. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43, 1571–1581 (1986).
doi: 10.1139/f86-195
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 210–220 (2020).
pubmed: 32015427 doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1084-y
Eisenhauer, N. et al. in Mechanisms Underlying the Relationship Between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Advances in Ecological Research Vol. 61, (eds Eisenhauer, N, Bohan, D. A. & Dumbrell A. J.) 1–54 (2019).
Marquard, E. et al. Positive biodiversity–productivity relationship due to increased plant density. J. Ecol. 97, 696–704 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01521.x
Lambers, J. H. R., Harpole, W. S., Tilman, D., Knops, J. & Reich, P. B. Mechanisms responsible for the positive diversity–productivity relationship in Minnesota grasslands. Ecol. Lett. 7, 661–668 (2004).
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00623.x
Schnabel, F. et al. Species richness stabilizes productivity via asynchrony and drought-tolerance diversity in a large-scale tree biodiversity experiment. Sci. Adv. 7, eabk1643 (2021).
pubmed: 34919425 pmcid: 8682986 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk1643
Wagg, C. et al. Biodiversity–stability relationships strengthen over time in a long-term grassland experiment. Nat. Commun. 13, 7752 (2022).
pubmed: 36517483 pmcid: 9751076 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35189-2
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B. & Knops, J. M. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441, 629–632 (2006).
pubmed: 16738658 doi: 10.1038/nature04742
Lange, M. et al. Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nat. Commun. 6, 6707 (2015).
pubmed: 25848862 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7707
Bezemer, T. M. et al. Soil community composition drives aboveground plant–herbivore–parasitoid interactions. Ecol. Lett. 8, 652–661 (2005).
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00762.x
Ristok, C. et al. Plant species richness elicits changes in the metabolome of grassland species via soil biotic legacy. J. Ecol. 107, 2240–2254 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13185
Staab, M. et al. Dear neighbor: trees with extrafloral nectaries facilitate defense and growth of adjacent undefended trees. Ecology 104, e4057 (2023).
pubmed: 37078562 doi: 10.1002/ecy.4057
Lefcheck, J. S. et al. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–7 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms7936
Stanton, N. The underground in grasslands. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 573–589 (2003).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.003041
Vidal, M. C. & Murphy, S. M. Bottom-up vs. top-down effects on terrestrial insect herbivores: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 21, 138–150 (2018).
pubmed: 29098754 doi: 10.1111/ele.12874
Duffy, J. E. et al. The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecol. Lett. 10, 522–538 (2007).
pubmed: 17498151 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01037.x
McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P. M. & Morin, P. J. Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390, 162–165 (1997).
doi: 10.1038/36561
Naeem, S., Thompson, L. J., Lawler, S. P., Lawton, J. H. & Woodfin, R. M. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368, 734–737 (1994).
doi: 10.1038/368734a0
Schmid, B. in Defining Agroecology (eds Dormann, C. F. et al.) 161–174 (tredition.com, 2023).
Bruno, J. F. & O’Connor, M. I. Cascading effects of predator diversity and omnivory in a marine food web. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1048–1056 (2005).
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00808.x
Byrnes, J. et al. Predator diversity strengthens trophic cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behaviour. Ecol. Lett. 9, 61–71 (2006).
pubmed: 16958869 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00842.x
Schuldt, A. et al. Carbon–biodiversity relationships in a highly diverse subtropical forest. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 5321–5333 (2023).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.16697
Roscher, C. et al. The role of biodiversity for element cycling and trophic interactions: an experimental approach in a grassland community. Basic Appl. Ecol. 5, 107–121 (2004).
doi: 10.1078/1439-1791-00216
Ebeling, A. et al. Plant diversity effects on arthropods and arthropod-dependent ecosystem functions in a biodiversity experiment. Basic Appl. Ecol. 26, 50–63 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2017.09.014
Rzanny, M. & Voigt, W. Complexity of multitrophic interactions in a grassland ecosystem depends on plant species diversity. J. Anim. Ecol. 81, 614–627 (2012).
pubmed: 22292705 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01951.x
Cesarz, S. et al. Plant species richness sustains higher trophic levels of soil nematode communities after consecutive environmental perturbations. Oecologia 184, 715–728 (2017).
pubmed: 28608023 doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-3893-5
Eisenhauer, N. et al. Plant diversity effects on soil microorganisms support the singular hypothesis. Ecology 91, 485–496 (2010).
pubmed: 20392013 doi: 10.1890/08-2338.1
Wahdan, S. F. M. et al. Organic agricultural practice enhances arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in correspondence to soil warming and altered precipitation patterns. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 6163–6176 (2021).
pubmed: 33780112 doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15492
Chen, J.-T. et al. Functional and phylogenetic relationships link predators to plant diversity via trophic and non-trophic pathways. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 290, 20221658 (2023).
Guo, P.-F. et al. Tree diversity promotes predatory wasps and parasitoids but not pollinator bees in a subtropical experimental forest. Basic Appl. Ecol. 53, 134–142 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2021.03.007
Li, Y. et al. Tree diversity and functional leaf traits drive herbivore-associated microbiomes in subtropical China. Ecol. Evol. 11, 6153–6166 (2021).
pubmed: 34141209 pmcid: 8207151 doi: 10.1002/ece3.7434
Skarbek, C. J. et al. A tale of scale: plot but not neighbourhood tree diversity increases leaf litter ant diversity. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 299–308 (2020).
pubmed: 31562768 doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13115
Gan, H. et al. Plants play stronger effects on soil fungal than bacterial communities and co-occurrence network structures in a subtropical tree diversity experiment. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, e00134–00122 (2022).
pubmed: 35475656 pmcid: 9241759 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00134-22
Zhang, N. et al. Tree species richness and fungi in freshly fallen leaf litter: unique patterns of fungal species composition and their implications for enzymatic decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 127, 120–126 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.09.023
Meyer, S. T. et al. Effects of biodiversity strengthen over time as ecosystem functioning declines at low and increases at high biodiversity. Ecosphere 7, e01619 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/ecs2.1619
Steinbeiss, S. et al. Plant diversity positively affects short-term soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 2937–2949 (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01697.x
Bongers, F. J. et al. Functional diversity effects on productivity increase with age in a forest biodiversity experiment. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1594–1603 (2021).
pubmed: 34737435 doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01564-3
Huang, Y. et al. Positive effects of tree species diversity on litterfall quantity and quality along a secondary successional chronosequence in a subtropical forest. J. Plant Ecol. 10, 28–35 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtw115
Schuldt, A., Fornoff, F., Bruelheide, H., Klein, A.-M. & Staab, M. Tree species richness attenuates the positive relationship between mutualistic ant–hemipteran interactions and leaf chewer herbivory. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 284, 20171489 (2017).
Rutten, G. et al. More diverse tree communities promote foliar fungal pathogen diversity, but decrease infestation rates per tree species, in a subtropical biodiversity experiment. J. Ecol. 109, 2068–2080 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13620
Allan, E. et al. Interannual variation in land-use intensity enhances grassland multidiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 308–313 (2014).
pubmed: 24368852 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312213111
Byrnes, J. E. et al. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 111–124 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12143
Mori, A. S. et al. Low multifunctional redundancy of soil fungal diversity at multiple scales. Ecol. Lett. 19, 249–259 (2016).
pubmed: 26689733 doi: 10.1111/ele.12560
Finlayson, M. et al. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water. Synthesis (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005).
Lefcheck, J. S. piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12512
Li, Y. & Liu, X. Li et al_plot_level_multidiversity_multitrophicdiversity_data. Figshare https://figshare.com/s/91cbc9f9aec78e2dced5 (2024).

Auteurs

Yi Li (Y)

State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Andreas Schuldt (A)

Forest Nature Conservation, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Anne Ebeling (A)

Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.

Nico Eisenhauer (N)

German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Yuanyuan Huang (Y)

German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Georg Albert (G)

Forest Nature Conservation, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Cynthia Albracht (C)

Biosystems Data Analysis, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Angelos Amyntas (A)

German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Michael Bonkowski (M)

Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Helge Bruelheide (H)

German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Maximilian Bröcher (M)

Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.

Douglas Chesters (D)

Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Jun Chen (J)

Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Yannan Chen (Y)

Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
College of Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Jing-Ting Chen (JT)

Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
College of Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Marcel Ciobanu (M)

Institute of Biological Research, Branch of the National Institute of Research and Development for Biological Sciences, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Xianglu Deng (X)

State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Felix Fornoff (F)

Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Gerd Gleixner (G)

Department of Biogeochemical Processes (BGP), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.

Liangdong Guo (L)

College of Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Peng-Fei Guo (PF)

College of Pharmacy, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.

Anna Heintz-Buschart (A)

Biosystems Data Analysis, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Alexandra-Maria Klein (AM)

Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Centre for Environmental and Climate Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Markus Lange (M)

Department of Biogeochemical Processes (BGP), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.

Shan Li (S)

State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Qi Li (Q)

CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China.

Yingbin Li (Y)

CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China.

Arong Luo (A)

Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Sebastian T Meyer (ST)

Department of Life Science Systems, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.

Goddert von Oheimb (G)

Institute of General Ecology and Environmental Protection, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Tharandt, Germany.

Gemma Rutten (G)

Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Thomas Scholten (T)

Department of Geosciences, Soil Science and Geomorphology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Marcel D Solbach (MD)

Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Michael Staab (M)

Ecological Networks, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.

Ming-Qiang Wang (MQ)

Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization and Biodiversity Conservation, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China.

Naili Zhang (N)

The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.

Chao-Dong Zhu (CD)

Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
College of Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Bernhard Schmid (B)

Remote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Keping Ma (K)

State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Xiaojuan Liu (X)

State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. liuxiaojuan06@ibcas.ac.cn.
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. liuxiaojuan06@ibcas.ac.cn.
Zhejiang Qianjiangyuan Forest Biodiversity National Observation and Research Station, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. liuxiaojuan06@ibcas.ac.cn.

Classifications MeSH