The relationship between space and time perception: A registered replication of Casasanto and Boroditsky (2008).
Magnitude
Metaphor theory
Perception
Space
Space-time interaction
Time
Journal
Attention, perception & psychophysics
ISSN: 1943-393X
Titre abrégé: Atten Percept Psychophys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101495384
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Aug 2024
29 Aug 2024
Historique:
accepted:
02
07
2024
medline:
31
8
2024
pubmed:
31
8
2024
entrez:
29
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Everything in our environment moves through both space and time, and to effectively act we must be aware of both spatial and temporal elements in relation to our own bodies. Thus, perceptions of space and time have an intimate relationship. Walsh's a theory of magnitude (ATOM) suggests that space and time perception rely on a general magnitude system and their relationship should be roughly symmetrical. Alternatively, metaphor theory, which is based on the philosophical work of Lakoff and Johnson, argues that we represent time using a spatial metaphor and thus the relationship should be asymmetrical (with space influencing time more than time influences space). A compelling line of evidence for metaphor theory comes from the work of Casasanto & Boroditsky. Cognition, 106(2), 579-593. (2008) who experimentally demonstrated this asymmetric effect. However, in our previous unpublished online replication attempt of this work, we found a roughly symmetrical relationship between space and time, more in line with the theoretical predictions of ATOM. Given this, we performed a registered replication of Casasanto & Boroditsky. Cognition, 106(2), 579-593. (2008) in both an online and laboratory environment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39210211
doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02942-2
pii: 10.3758/s13414-024-02942-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Références
Arend, M. G., & Schäfer, T. (2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on monte carlo simulation. Psychological methods, 24(1), 1.
doi: 10.1037/met0000195
pubmed: 30265048
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Billups, S. N., Burchell, A., Gillham, E. A., Smith, M., & Durgin, F. H. (2019). Time after time: Repeated failure to support the space/time claims of casasanto and boroditsky (2008). Journal of Vision, 19(10), 163–163.
doi: 10.1167/19.10.163
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28.
doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6
pubmed: 10815775
Bryant, P., & Squire, S. (2001). Children’s mathematics: Lost and found in space. In: Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 175–200).
Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1525), 1831–1840.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0028
Cai, Z. G., & Connell, L. (2015). Space-time interdependence: Evidence against asymmetric mapping between time and space. Cognition, 136, 268–281.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.039
pubmed: 25506776
Cai, Z. G., Wang, R., Shen, M., & Speekenbrink, M. (2018). Cross-dimensional magnitude interactions arise from memory interference. Cognitive psychology, 106, 21–42.
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.08.001
pubmed: 30165241
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106(2), 579–593.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004
pubmed: 17509553
Casasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Space and time in the child’s mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive science, 34(3), 387–405.
Church, R. M. (1984). The numerical attribute of stimuli. Animal cognition.
Critchley, M. (1953). The parietal lobes. Hafner Press.
Crump, M. J., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating amazon’s mechanical turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PloS one, 8(3), e57410.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410
pubmed: 23516406
pmcid: 3596391
Gijssels, T., Bottini, R., Rueschemeyer, S.-A., & Casasanto, D. (2013). Space and time in the parietal cortex: fmri evidence for a neural asymmetry. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society (Vol. 35).
Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). Simr: an r package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498.
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12504
Hlavac, M. (2013). stargazer: Latex code and ascii text for well-formatted regression and summary statistics tables. URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stargazer .
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphor we live by. Chicago/London.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., et al. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought (Vol. 640). Basic books New York.
Manapat, P. D., Anderson, S. F., & Edwards, M. C. (2022). A revised and expanded taxonomy for understanding heterogeneity in research and reporting practices. Psychological Methods.
Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2014). Time perception: the bad news and the good. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(4), 429–446.
pubmed: 25210578
Maxwell, S. E., Delaney, H. D., & Kelley, K. (2017). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Routledge.
Meck, W. H., & Church, R. M. (1983). A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9(3), 320.
pubmed: 6886634
Merritt, D. J., Casasanto, D., & Brannon, E. M. (2010). Do monkeys think in metaphors? representations of space and time in monkeys and humans. Cognition, 117(2), 191–202.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.011
pubmed: 20846645
pmcid: 2952654
Peirce, J. W. (2007). Psychopy-psychophysics software in python. Journal of neuroscience methods, 162(1–2), 8–13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
pubmed: 17254636
pmcid: 2018741
Semmelmann, K., & Weigelt, S. (2017). Online psychophysics: Reaction time effects in cognitive experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1241–1260.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0783-4
pubmed: 27496171
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological science, 22(11), 1359–1366.
doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632
pubmed: 22006061
Stoffel, M. A., Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2021). partr2: Partitioning r2 in generalized linear mixed models. PeerJ, 9, e11414.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.11414
pubmed: 34113487
pmcid: 8162244
Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(11), 483–488.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
pubmed: 14585444
Wang, R., & Cai, Z. G. (2017). Cross-dimensional magnitude interaction is modulated by representational noise: Evidence from space-time interaction.