Anatomical relationship between maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus in an Indonesian population: a CT scan study.
CT-Scan
Indonesia population
Maxillary posterior teeth
Maxillary sinus
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Aug 2024
29 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
27
05
2024
accepted:
20
08
2024
medline:
31
8
2024
pubmed:
31
8
2024
entrez:
29
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The anatomical proximity between the root apex of the maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus can lead to complications, including odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. While several studies have investigated similar variables in different populations, there is limited research on the Indonesian population. This study aimed to describe the anatomical position of the maxillary posterior teeth in relation to the floor of the maxillary sinus using CT scans. A total of 122 patients (432 maxillary premolars and 1,282 maxillary molars) underwent CT scans to evaluate 1,711 roots. The vertical relationship between the root apex of the maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus was classified into three types: IS (inside sinus), CO (sinus contact), and OS (outside sinus). The IS type was predominantly found in the palatal roots of the first molars, accounting for 20% of the total roots in this type. The CO type was most frequently observed in the mesiobuccal roots of the second molars, representing 18% of the total roots in this type. The OS type was most commonly found in the first premolar, comprising 20% of the total roots in this type. The palatal roots of the first molars exhibited the highest frequency of proximity to the maxillary sinus. CT scans can effectively assess the relationship between the root apex of the posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus. Clinicians should consider this information comprehensively when planning treatments for maxillary molars.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The anatomical proximity between the root apex of the maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus can lead to complications, including odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. While several studies have investigated similar variables in different populations, there is limited research on the Indonesian population. This study aimed to describe the anatomical position of the maxillary posterior teeth in relation to the floor of the maxillary sinus using CT scans.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 122 patients (432 maxillary premolars and 1,282 maxillary molars) underwent CT scans to evaluate 1,711 roots. The vertical relationship between the root apex of the maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus was classified into three types: IS (inside sinus), CO (sinus contact), and OS (outside sinus).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The IS type was predominantly found in the palatal roots of the first molars, accounting for 20% of the total roots in this type. The CO type was most frequently observed in the mesiobuccal roots of the second molars, representing 18% of the total roots in this type. The OS type was most commonly found in the first premolar, comprising 20% of the total roots in this type.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The palatal roots of the first molars exhibited the highest frequency of proximity to the maxillary sinus. CT scans can effectively assess the relationship between the root apex of the posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
CONCLUSIONS
Clinicians should consider this information comprehensively when planning treatments for maxillary molars.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39210347
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04783-9
pii: 10.1186/s12903-024-04783-9
pmc: PMC11363505
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1014Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
J Endod. 2013 Jun;39(6):748-51
pubmed: 23683273
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):164
pubmed: 30285721
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018 Mar 25;3(2):110-114
pubmed: 29721543
Braz Dent J. 2016 Jan-Feb;27(1):9-15
pubmed: 27007338
J Endod. 2016 Mar;42(3):371-7
pubmed: 26711862
Anat Cell Biol. 2021 Dec 31;54(4):431-435
pubmed: 34373360
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Aug;44(8):617-625
pubmed: 28547776
J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520926896
pubmed: 32489120
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2008 May;10(3):205-10
pubmed: 18510882
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017 Nov-Dec;21(6):466-472
pubmed: 29551865
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Jan;18(1):293-300
pubmed: 23525890
Int J Legal Med. 2018 May;132(3):923-931
pubmed: 29260392
Indian J Dent. 2016 Sep;7(3):126-130
pubmed: 27795646
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
J Endod. 2015 Nov;41(11):1839-46
pubmed: 26411520
Imaging Sci Dent. 2019 Jun;49(2):115-122
pubmed: 31281788
J Investig Clin Dent. 2019 Aug;10(3):e12402
pubmed: 30693662
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Jun;157(6):792-802
pubmed: 32487309
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 01;15(5):618-22
pubmed: 25707836
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2020 Mar;43:101665
pubmed: 31945677
Yonsei Med J. 2010 Nov;51(6):932-7
pubmed: 20879062
Cureus. 2020 Jan 9;12(1):e6611
pubmed: 31966939
Circulation. 2003 Oct 14;108(15):e104-6
pubmed: 14557345
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010 Jan 01;15(1):e70-3
pubmed: 19767698
Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Nov;36(9):907-14
pubmed: 24874032
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(6):20160043
pubmed: 27268417
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 20;21(1):358
pubmed: 34284763
Braz Oral Res. 2018 Aug 06;32:e64
pubmed: 30088551
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Sep;102(3):375-81
pubmed: 16920546
Eur J Dent. 2010 Oct;4(4):462-7
pubmed: 20922167
Anat Cell Biol. 2019 Mar;52(1):17-24
pubmed: 30984447
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992 Mar;73(3):345-6
pubmed: 1545967
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 May;160(5):1101-4
pubmed: 8470585