Outcomes of Resectable Gallbladder Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Care Centre in India.

adjuvant chemotheapy disease-free survival (dfs) overall survival (os) radical cholecystectomy resectable gallbladder cancer

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Historique:
accepted: 30 07 2024
medline: 1 9 2024
pubmed: 1 9 2024
entrez: 30 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has deleterious outcomes, but due to its reduced incidence in Western countries, there is a paucity of data on this disease. Here we report the outcomes of a retrospective analysis of resectable gallbladder cancer from a tertiary cancer centre in eastern India. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates among patients with resectable GBC. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on patients who underwent radical surgery between 2007 and 2022 and received various neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy methods. Patients who had adjuvant chemoradiotherapy concurrently or who did not receive adjuvant therapy were excluded. All the baseline clinicopathological characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records. The survival data were collected from records of follow-up visits as well as telephonic calls to the patients who were lost to follow-up. Simple proportions were used for baseline characteristics, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Results A total of 161 patients were identified, and data were captured from electronic medical records. The included patients' ages ranged between 26 and 80 years, with a median age of 56 years. Among the participants, 103 were female (64%) and 58 (36%) were male. Among the 161 patients, the median number of lymph nodes harvested was nine (ranging from one to 43), and only three patients were margin-positive. The tumour, nodes, and metastasis (TNM) distributions were as follows: pT2 in 111 patients (70.25%), pT3 in 44 patients (27.85%), and pT4 in three patients (1.90%). The nodal statuses were pN0 in 91 patients (61.9%), pN1 in 51 patients (34.69%), and pN2 in five patients (3.4%). The majority (64%) received single-agent capecitabine, 27% received gemcitabine-based platinum doublet therapy, and 4.3% received neoadjuvant therapy. Of the full sample, 2.4% received concurrent adjuvant chemo plus radiation therapy, and three patients did not receive any adjuvant therapy. Additionally, among the 161 patients, 34.16% had a relapse, with 47% being local and 52% being distant relapses. The median follow-up was 49 months (interquartile range (IQR) 23-71 months). The 24-month RFS rate was 67.1% (SD+/- 4.3%), and the 24-month OS rate was 78.1% (SD+/- 4.1%). Conclusion Our data, which is from one of the largest samples from India, show that resectable gallbladder cancer has very good outcomes after radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. There was a higher proportion of T2 and node-negative disease, which could have led to better survival compared to published literature.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39211665
doi: 10.7759/cureus.65735
pmc: PMC11360279
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e65735

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, Das et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Tata Medical Center-Institutional Review Board (TMC-IRB) issued approval (EC/WV/TMC/29/24). Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Références

Br J Surg. 2018 Feb;105(3):192-202
pubmed: 29405274
BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1288-9
pubmed: 9804716
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):663-673
pubmed: 30922733
Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 5;:
pubmed: 33818764
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Aug;8(4):728-736
pubmed: 28890824
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Feb;26(2):398-407
pubmed: 34545545
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar 10;37(8):658-667
pubmed: 30707660
Indian J Med Res. 2021 Jan;154(1):27-35
pubmed: 34782528
BMC Cancer. 2015 Sep 03;15:615
pubmed: 26337466
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81
pubmed: 20375404
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 21;21(43):12211-7
pubmed: 26604631
Cancer. 2002 Oct 15;95(8):1685-95
pubmed: 12365016
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1934-40
pubmed: 22529261

Auteurs

Sanjay Chandra Das (SC)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND.

Joydeep Ghosh (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND.

Sagar Kanta (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND.

Harsh Thakran (H)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND.

Sandip Ganguly (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND.

Bivas Biswas (B)

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND.

Sudeep Banerjee (S)

Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) and Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgery, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND.

Manas Kumar Roy (MK)

Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) and Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgery, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND.

Tanuj Chawala (T)

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, IND.

Classifications MeSH