Functional Outcomes of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures in the Elderly: A Prospective Study.
bipolar hemiarthroplasty
functional outcome
harris hip score
intertrochanteric femur fracture
merle d'aubigné score
proximal femoral nail
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Jul 2024
Historique:
accepted:
30
07
2024
medline:
1
9
2024
pubmed:
1
9
2024
entrez:
30
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background Intertrochanteric femur fractures are relatively common injuries among elderly individuals. Treatment options include fixation of intertrochanteric fractures using proximal femoral nails (PFNs), dynamic hip screws (DHSs), and unipolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Unstable types of intertrochanteric fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) types 31-A2 and A3) are more common in elderly osteoporotic people. Intertrochanteric femur fractures having a subtrochanteric extension, comminution at the posteromedial cortex, and reverse obliquity are considered to be unstable. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the functional outcomes of an unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty as the primary treatment option. Aims and objectives This study aims to assess the functional outcomes of bipolar hemiarthroplasty in unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel Criteria. The time point of assessment was from August 2016 to August 2018. Material and methods Fifteen elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur were treated with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Patients with unstable femur fractures or with osteoporosis and age above 65 years were included in the study. Harris Hip Score and the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel Criteria were used to measure functional outcomes. Patients were followed up at the first, third, and sixth months and subsequently at the end of one year. Results The mean age of the patients was 78.73 years. The majority (11) of the patients were female (73%). The average operative time was 119 minutes, the average blood loss was 380 ml, the mean postoperative hospital stay was 12 days, and the average time taken for mobilization was four days. An average of 15 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur were treated with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. The HHS on the first follow-up was 42.44 (SD of 6.52), followed by a score of 64.43 (SD of 8.11) on the second follow-up, 82.32 (SD of 2.81) on the third follow-up, and 84.23 (SD of 3.15) on the fourth follow-up. Eleven patients had good results, and two had fair results at the one-year follow-up, according to the HHS. According to the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel Criteria, 11 patients had very good results, and two had moderate results at the one-year follow-up. The average Merle d'Aubigné score was 14.6 on the final follow-up after one year. Conclusion Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in an unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture in the elderly results in better functional outcomes, as it helps in early full weight-bearing mobilization, which significantly decreases complications of prolonged immobilization and can be safely considered in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39211719
doi: 10.7759/cureus.65731
pmc: PMC11359907
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e65731Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024, Rathod et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee, N. K. P. Salve Institute Of Medical Sciences & Research Centre And Lata Mangeshkar Hospital issued approval 21/2016. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Références
J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Apr;32(4):698-707
pubmed: 27862286
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Apr;52(3):457-67
pubmed: 5425640
Indian J Orthop. 2011 Nov;45(6):514-9
pubmed: 22144744
Injury. 2015 Jul;46 Suppl 2:S3-8
pubmed: 26052057
Int Orthop. 2001;25(6):360-2
pubmed: 11820441
Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(4):213-7
pubmed: 24453605
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Jul;29(5):1035-1042
pubmed: 30778679
Acta Orthop Belg. 1994;60(3):274-9
pubmed: 7992603
J Bone Miner Res. 2023 Aug;38(8):1064-1075
pubmed: 37118993
Acta Biomed. 2019 Dec 05;90(12-S):82-85
pubmed: 31821289
Indian J Orthop. 2010 Oct;44(4):428-34
pubmed: 20924485
N Am J Med Sci. 2010 Dec;2(12):561-8
pubmed: 22558568
Orthopedics. 1990 Oct;13(10):1131-6
pubmed: 2251230
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55
pubmed: 5783851