Benefit of isolated surgical valve repair or replacement for functional tricuspid regurgitation and long-term outcomes stratified by the TRI-SCORE.
management
outcome
surgery
tricuspid regurgitation
Journal
European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Aug 2024
30 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
03
07
2024
revised:
28
07
2024
accepted:
18
08
2024
medline:
31
8
2024
pubmed:
31
8
2024
entrez:
30
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with increased mortality rates, but benefit of its correction and ideal timing are not clearly determined. This study aimed to identify patient subsets who might benefit from surgery. In TRIGISTRY, an international cohort study of consecutive patients with severe isolated functional TR (33 centers, 10 countries), survival rates up to 10 years were compared between patients who underwent isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery (repair or replacement) and those conservatively managed, overall and according to TRI-SCORE category (low: ≤3, intermediate: 4-5, high: ≥6). 1,217 were managed conservatively, and 551 underwent isolated TV surgery (200 repairs, 351 replacements). TRI-SCORE distribution was 33% low, 32% intermediate, and 35% high. At 10 years, survival rates were similar between surgical and conservative management (41% vs. 36%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.08, P=0.57). Surgery improved survival compared to conservative management in the low TRI-SCORE category (72% vs. 44%; HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.20-0.37, P<0.0001), but not in the intermediate (36% vs. 37%, HR 1.17; 95%CI 0.98-1.40, P=0.09) or high categories (20% vs. 24%; HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.91-1.25, P=0.45). Both repair and replacement improved survival in the low TRI-SCORE category (84% and 61% vs. 44%; HR 0.11; 95% CI 0.06-0.19, P<0.0001, and HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47-0.90, P=0.009). Repair showed benefit in the intermediate category (59% vs. 37%; HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.35-0.68, P<0.0001) while replacement was possibly harmful (25% vs. 37%; HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.18-1.72, P=0.0002). Higher survival rates were observed with repair than replacement and benefit of intervention declined as TRI-SCORE increased with no benefit of any type of surgery in the high TRI-SCORE category. These results emphasize the importance of timely intervention and patient selection to achieve the best outcomes and the need for randomized controlled trials. TRIGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05825898.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with increased mortality rates, but benefit of its correction and ideal timing are not clearly determined. This study aimed to identify patient subsets who might benefit from surgery.
METHODS
METHODS
In TRIGISTRY, an international cohort study of consecutive patients with severe isolated functional TR (33 centers, 10 countries), survival rates up to 10 years were compared between patients who underwent isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery (repair or replacement) and those conservatively managed, overall and according to TRI-SCORE category (low: ≤3, intermediate: 4-5, high: ≥6).
RESULTS
RESULTS
1,217 were managed conservatively, and 551 underwent isolated TV surgery (200 repairs, 351 replacements). TRI-SCORE distribution was 33% low, 32% intermediate, and 35% high. At 10 years, survival rates were similar between surgical and conservative management (41% vs. 36%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.08, P=0.57). Surgery improved survival compared to conservative management in the low TRI-SCORE category (72% vs. 44%; HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.20-0.37, P<0.0001), but not in the intermediate (36% vs. 37%, HR 1.17; 95%CI 0.98-1.40, P=0.09) or high categories (20% vs. 24%; HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.91-1.25, P=0.45). Both repair and replacement improved survival in the low TRI-SCORE category (84% and 61% vs. 44%; HR 0.11; 95% CI 0.06-0.19, P<0.0001, and HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47-0.90, P=0.009). Repair showed benefit in the intermediate category (59% vs. 37%; HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.35-0.68, P<0.0001) while replacement was possibly harmful (25% vs. 37%; HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.18-1.72, P=0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Higher survival rates were observed with repair than replacement and benefit of intervention declined as TRI-SCORE increased with no benefit of any type of surgery in the high TRI-SCORE category. These results emphasize the importance of timely intervention and patient selection to achieve the best outcomes and the need for randomized controlled trials.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
TRIGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05825898.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39212387
pii: 7742126
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae578
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05825898']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Investigateurs
Nina Ajmone Marsan
(NA)
Hannes Alessandrini
(H)
Luigi Badano
(L)
Philipp Bartko
(P)
Jeroen Bax
(J)
Baptiste Bazire
(B)
Giovanni Benfari
(G)
Jordan Bernick
(J)
Yohann Bohbot
(Y)
Manuel Carnero-Alcazar
(M)
Vincent Chan
(V)
Augustin Coisne
(A)
Juan Crestanello
(J)
Michele De Bonis
(M)
Fabien Doguet
(F)
Erwan Donal
(E)
Julien Dreyfus
(J)
Florian Eggenspieler
(F)
Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
(M)
Andrea Eixerés-Esteve
(A)
Rodrigo Estevez Loureiro
(RE)
Damien Eyharts
(D)
Michele Flagiello
(M)
Xavier Galloo
(X)
Mara Gavazzoni
(M)
Gilbert Habib
(G)
Rebecca Hahn
(R)
Jörg Hausleiter
(J)
Gregor Heitzinger
(G)
Samuel Heuts
(S)
Dominique Himbert
(D)
Christos Iliadis
(C)
Bernard Iung
(B)
Fernando Juarez-Casso
(F)
Karl-Patrick Kresoja
(KP)
Azeem Latib
(A)
Alexander Lauten
(A)
Yoan Lavie-Badie
(Y)
Thierry Le Tourneau
(T)
Pascal Lim
(P)
Edith Lubos
(E)
Philipp Lurz
(P)
Francesco Maisano
(F)
Yannick Mbaki
(Y)
Hector Michelena
(H)
Thomas Modine
(T)
David Messika-Zeitoun
(D)
Denisa Muraru
(D)
Mohammed Nejjari
(M)
Georg Nickenig
(G)
Martin Nicol
(M)
Luis Nombela-Franco
(L)
Jean-François Obadia
(JF)
Hazem Omran
(H)
Giovanni Pedrazzini
(G)
Roman Pfister
(R)
Kerstin Piayda
(K)
Fabien Praz
(F)
Costin Radu
(C)
Kenza Rahmouni El Idrissi
(KR)
Elisabeth Riant
(E)
Josep Rodés-Cabau
(J)
Volker Rudolph
(V)
Tobias Ruf
(T)
Giulio Russo
(G)
Alessandra Sala
(A)
Peyman Sardari Nia
(PS)
Joachim Schofer
(J)
Christine Selton-Suty
(C)
Thomas Senage
(T)
Horst Sievert
(H)
Lukas Stolz
(L)
Gilbert H L Tang
(GHL)
Maurizio Taramasso
(M)
Jacques Tomasi
(J)
Yan Topilsky
(Y)
Christophe Tribouilloy
(C)
Florence Viau
(F)
Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben
(RS)
Marina Urena Alcazar
(MU)
John Webb
(J)
Marcel Weber
(M)
George A Wells
(GA)
Stephan Windecker
(S)
Jose Luis Zamorano
(JL)
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.