A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective structured medication reviews in primary care: Findings from the DynAIRx study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
16
02
2024
accepted:
24
06
2024
medline:
31
8
2024
pubmed:
31
8
2024
entrez:
30
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Structured medication reviews (SMRs), introduced in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2020, aim to enhance shared decision-making in medication optimisation, particularly for patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Despite its potential, there is limited empirical evidence on the implementation of SMRs, and the challenges faced in the process. This study is part of a larger DynAIRx (Artificial Intelligence for dynamic prescribing optimisation and care integration in multimorbidity) project which aims to introduce Artificial Intelligence (AI) to SMRs and develop machine learning models and visualisation tools for patients with multimorbidity. Here, we explore how SMRs are currently undertaken and what barriers are experienced by those involved in them. Qualitative focus groups and semi-structured interviews took place between 2022-2023. Six focus groups were conducted with doctors, pharmacists and clinical pharmacologists (n = 21), and three patient focus groups with patients with multimorbidity (n = 13). Five semi-structured interviews were held with 2 pharmacists, 1 trainee doctor, 1 policy-maker and 1 psychiatrist. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Two key themes limiting the effectiveness of SMRs in clinical practice were identified: 'Medication Reviews in Practice' and 'Medication-related Challenges'. Participants noted limitations to the efficient and effectiveness of SMRs in practice including the scarcity of digital tools for identifying and prioritising patients for SMRs; organisational and patient-related challenges in inviting patients for SMRs and ensuring they attend; the time-intensive nature of SMRs, the need for multiple appointments and shared decision-making; the impact of the healthcare context on SMR delivery; poor communication and data sharing issues between primary and secondary care; difficulties in managing mental health medications and specific challenges associated with anticholinergic medication. SMRs are complex, time consuming and medication optimisation may require multiple follow-up appointments to enable a comprehensive review. There is a need for a prescribing support system to identify, prioritise and reduce the time needed to understand the patient journey when dealing with large volumes of disparate clinical information in electronic health records. However, monitoring the effects of medication optimisation changes with a feedback loop can be challenging to establish and maintain using current electronic health record systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39213435
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299770
pii: PONE-D-24-06064
pmc: PMC11364411
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0299770Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 Abuzour et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No competing interests
Références
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Oct;55(519):755-62
pubmed: 16212850
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Mar 25;15:31
pubmed: 25879993
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 23;18(1):112
pubmed: 31337403
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jan;24(1):43-46
pubmed: 31156897
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 26;11(2):e042497
pubmed: 33637542
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):509
pubmed: 35729544
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Apr 20;:
pubmed: 35760564
BMJ Med. 2022 Jul 27;1(1):e000247
pubmed: 36936594
Health Promot Int. 2022 Aug 1;37(4):
pubmed: 36047637
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 19;11(4):e0151066
pubmed: 27093289
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):16
pubmed: 33776605
Age Ageing. 2015 Sep;44(5):732-5
pubmed: 26175349
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 13;9(9):e029357
pubmed: 31519674
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jul 14;23(1):435
pubmed: 37442984
Sociol Methodol. 2011 Aug 1;41(1):355-366
pubmed: 22228916
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Sep;155:107804
pubmed: 31376400
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):399-408
pubmed: 36420768
Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;11(6):431-442
pubmed: 38642560
J R Soc Med. 2022 Jan;115(1):22-30
pubmed: 34672832
Ann Fam Med. 2020 Mar;18(2):148-155
pubmed: 32152019
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:237-251
pubmed: 29608870
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Dec;3(12):e586-e597
pubmed: 30473483
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 1;19(3):e0294974
pubmed: 38427674
J Multimorb Comorb. 2022 Dec 15;12:26335565221145493
pubmed: 36545235
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jan;24(1):30-33
pubmed: 31156894
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):60-7
pubmed: 21640456
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2021 Dec;8(4):431-458
pubmed: 34164795