Microbiota but not immune modulation by a pro- and postbiotic was associated with the diet-additive interaction in broilers.

dietary challenge immunity microbiota postbiotic probiotic

Journal

Poultry science
ISSN: 1525-3171
Titre abrégé: Poult Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401150

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 17 04 2024
revised: 17 07 2024
accepted: 01 08 2024
medline: 31 8 2024
pubmed: 31 8 2024
entrez: 30 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study investigated the diet-additive interactions of a Lactobacilli-based probiotic (Pro) and postbiotic (Post) on immune parameters and cecal microbiota composition, with subsequent effects on the metabolome in broilers. A completely randomized block design was employed with 2 diets [standard (SD), and challenge (CD)] and 3 additive conditions (Control, Pro, Post) involving 1,368 one-day-old male Ross 308 broilers equally distributed among 36 pens in a 42 d study. Diets were formulated to contain identical nutrient levels, with CD higher than SD in non-starch polysaccharide content by including rye and barley. Total non-specific serum Ig A, M and G concentrations were determined weekly from d14 to 35. Following vaccination, titres of specific antibodies binding Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) were measured. Microbiota composition was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing at d14 and 35, and α- and β-diversity indexes (Observed, Chao1, Bray, Jaccard) were calculated. Cecal short-chain fatty acids and the semi-polar metabolome were determined in the Control SD and all CD groups at d35. At d35, a diet-additive interaction was observed on cecal microbiota composition. Within SD, Pro and Post did not affect operational taxonomic units (OTU) abundance (adjusted-P > 0.05) and diversity indexes (P > 0.05). Within CD, Pro and Post affected the relative abundances of 37 and 44 OTUs, respectively (adjusted-P < 0.05), with Post but not Pro affecting β-diversity indexes (P = 0.041 and 0.064 for Bray and Jaccard, respectively). Within CD, Post increased cecal acetate (21%; P = 0.007) and butyrate (41%; P = 0.002) concentration and affected the concentration of 2 metabolites (adjusted-P < 0.05), while Pro affected 240 metabolites (adjusted-P < 0.05). No diet-additive interactions were observed on serum Ig (P > 0.05), except for IgM at d14 (P = 0.004). Diet composition, but not the additives, affected immune status parameters. The Pro and Post affected cecal microbiota composition only under dietary challenging conditions as previously reported for growth.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39214057
pii: S0032-5791(24)00763-6
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104184
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104184

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Samuel C G Jansseune (SCG)

Animal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands; Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France; Idena, Sautron, France. Electronic address: samuel.jansseune@idena.fr.

Fany Blanc (F)

Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

Aart Lammers (A)

Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Jürgen van Baal (J)

Animal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Nicolas Bruneau (N)

Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

Marie-Hélène Pinard-van der Laan (MP)

Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

Wouter H Hendriks (WH)

Animal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Fanny Calenge (F)

Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

Classifications MeSH