Risk factors for recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in microwave ablation of thyroid nodules: A multicenter study.

Microwave ablation Recurrent laryngeal nerve Risk factor Thyroid nodule

Journal

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 29 01 2024
revised: 13 08 2024
accepted: 26 08 2024
medline: 1 9 2024
pubmed: 1 9 2024
entrez: 31 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury after microwave ablation (MWA) of thyroid nodules and to identify factors influencing the recovery time of post-procedure hoarseness. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent MWA for thyroid nodules at five hospitals between November 2018 and July 2022. Patients were divided into malignant and benign nodule groups. Variables analyzed included nodule size and location, the shortest distance from nodules to the thyroid capsule and tracheoesophageal groove (TEG-D), and ablation parameters. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors. Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses were used to evaluate the recovery time of hoarseness after MWA. The study included 1,216 patients (mean age 44 ± 12 [SD] years; 901 women) with 602 malignant nodules and 614 benign nodules. The posterior capsule distance (PCD) and TEG-D were identified as independent influencing factors for hoarseness in all patients (P = 0.014, OR = 0.068; P < 0.001, OR = 0.005; AUC = 0.869). TEG-D was a significant risk factor for hoarseness, with safe thresholds identified at 4.9 mm for malignant nodules and 2.2 mm for benign nodules. Among patients who developed hoarseness, those in the close-distance group (TEG-D≤2 mm) had a longer recovery time compared to the distant-distance group. TEG-D was an independent factor influencing recovery time (P = 0.008, HR = 11.204). Clinicians should consider several factors, particularly TEG-D and PCD, when assessing the risk of RLN injury before MWA. TEG-D was a vital independent factor influencing recovery time. Clinicians should pay attention to several influencing factors for RLN injury before MWA and TEG-D was an independent influencing factor for recovery time of hoarseness after MWA.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury after microwave ablation (MWA) of thyroid nodules and to identify factors influencing the recovery time of post-procedure hoarseness.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent MWA for thyroid nodules at five hospitals between November 2018 and July 2022. Patients were divided into malignant and benign nodule groups. Variables analyzed included nodule size and location, the shortest distance from nodules to the thyroid capsule and tracheoesophageal groove (TEG-D), and ablation parameters. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors. Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses were used to evaluate the recovery time of hoarseness after MWA.
RESULTS RESULTS
The study included 1,216 patients (mean age 44 ± 12 [SD] years; 901 women) with 602 malignant nodules and 614 benign nodules. The posterior capsule distance (PCD) and TEG-D were identified as independent influencing factors for hoarseness in all patients (P = 0.014, OR = 0.068; P < 0.001, OR = 0.005; AUC = 0.869). TEG-D was a significant risk factor for hoarseness, with safe thresholds identified at 4.9 mm for malignant nodules and 2.2 mm for benign nodules. Among patients who developed hoarseness, those in the close-distance group (TEG-D≤2 mm) had a longer recovery time compared to the distant-distance group. TEG-D was an independent factor influencing recovery time (P = 0.008, HR = 11.204).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Clinicians should consider several factors, particularly TEG-D and PCD, when assessing the risk of RLN injury before MWA. TEG-D was a vital independent factor influencing recovery time.
SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS
Clinicians should pay attention to several influencing factors for RLN injury before MWA and TEG-D was an independent influencing factor for recovery time of hoarseness after MWA.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39216824
pii: S0167-8140(24)03494-7
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110516
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110516

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Ming-Hong Xu (MH)

From Senior Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, China; Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, China.

Jian-Ping Dou (JP)

Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA Medical School & Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Mo-Han Guo (MH)

From Senior Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, China; Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, China.

Wen-Qi Yi (WQ)

Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, China; Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA Medical School & Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Zhi-Yu Han (ZY)

Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA Medical School & Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Fang-Yi Liu (FY)

Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA Medical School & Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Jie Yu (J)

Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA Medical School & Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Zhi-Gang Cheng (ZG)

Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA Medical School & Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Xiao-Ling Yu (XL)

Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA Medical School & Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Hui Wang (H)

Department of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Nan Bai (N)

Department of Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.

Shu-Rong Wang (SR)

Department of Medical Ultrasound, Yantai Hospital of Shandong Wendeng Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Yantai, China.

Ming-An Yu (MA)

Department of Interventional Ultrasound Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Ping Liang (P)

Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA Medical School & Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. Electronic address: liangping301@126.com.

Lei Chen (L)

From Senior Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, China. Electronic address: chen301@aliyun.com.

Classifications MeSH