Exploring aortic morphology and determining variable-distance insertion lengths for fluoroscopy-free resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA).
Aortic lengths
Aortic morphology
Fluoroscopy-free
Pre-hospital
REBOA
Journal
World journal of emergency surgery : WJES
ISSN: 1749-7922
Titre abrégé: World J Emerg Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101266603
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Aug 2024
31 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
27
05
2024
accepted:
14
08
2024
medline:
1
9
2024
pubmed:
1
9
2024
entrez:
31
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is used to temporary control non-compressible truncal hemorrhage (NCTH) as bridge to definitive surgical treatment. The dependence on radiography for safe balloon positioning is one factor that limits the extended use of REBOA in civilian and military pre-hospital settings. We aimed to determine standardized sex and age-based variable-distance catheter insertion lengths for accurate REBOA placement without initial fluoroscopic confirmation. Contrast enhanced CT-scans from a representative sample of a Dutch non-trauma population were retrospectively analyzed. Intravascular distances were measured from the bilateral common femoral artery access points (FAAP) to the middle of the aortic occlusion zones and accompanying boundaries. Means and 95% confidence intervals for the distances from the FAAPs to the boundaries and mid-zone III were calculated for all (combined) sex and age-based subgroups. Optimal insertion lengths and potentially safe regions were determined for these groups. Bootstrap analysis was performed in combination with a 40-mm long balloon introduction simulation to determine error-rates and REBOA placement accuracy for the general population. In total, 1354 non-trauma patients (694 females) were included. Vascular distances increased with age and were longer in males. The iliofemoral trajectory was 7 mm longer on the right side. The optimal zone I catheter insertion length would be 430 mm. Optimal zone III catheter insertion lengths showed up to 30 mm difference, ranging between 234 and 264 mm. Statistically significant and potentially clinically relevant differences were observed between the anatomical distances and necessary introduction depths for each subgroup. This is the first study to compare aortic morphology and intravascular distances between combined sex and age-based subgroups. As zone III length was consistent, length variability and elongation seem to mainly originate in the iliofemoral trajectory and zone II. The optimal zone I catheter insertion length would be 430 mm. Optimal zone III catheter insertion ranged between 234 and 264 mm. These standardized variable-distance insertion lengths could facilitate safer fluoroscopy-free REBOA in austere, pre-hospital settings.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND (RATIONALE/PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE)
UNASSIGNED
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is used to temporary control non-compressible truncal hemorrhage (NCTH) as bridge to definitive surgical treatment. The dependence on radiography for safe balloon positioning is one factor that limits the extended use of REBOA in civilian and military pre-hospital settings. We aimed to determine standardized sex and age-based variable-distance catheter insertion lengths for accurate REBOA placement without initial fluoroscopic confirmation.
METHODS
METHODS
Contrast enhanced CT-scans from a representative sample of a Dutch non-trauma population were retrospectively analyzed. Intravascular distances were measured from the bilateral common femoral artery access points (FAAP) to the middle of the aortic occlusion zones and accompanying boundaries. Means and 95% confidence intervals for the distances from the FAAPs to the boundaries and mid-zone III were calculated for all (combined) sex and age-based subgroups. Optimal insertion lengths and potentially safe regions were determined for these groups. Bootstrap analysis was performed in combination with a 40-mm long balloon introduction simulation to determine error-rates and REBOA placement accuracy for the general population.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 1354 non-trauma patients (694 females) were included. Vascular distances increased with age and were longer in males. The iliofemoral trajectory was 7 mm longer on the right side. The optimal zone I catheter insertion length would be 430 mm. Optimal zone III catheter insertion lengths showed up to 30 mm difference, ranging between 234 and 264 mm. Statistically significant and potentially clinically relevant differences were observed between the anatomical distances and necessary introduction depths for each subgroup.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study to compare aortic morphology and intravascular distances between combined sex and age-based subgroups. As zone III length was consistent, length variability and elongation seem to mainly originate in the iliofemoral trajectory and zone II. The optimal zone I catheter insertion length would be 430 mm. Optimal zone III catheter insertion ranged between 234 and 264 mm. These standardized variable-distance insertion lengths could facilitate safer fluoroscopy-free REBOA in austere, pre-hospital settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39217357
doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00557-4
pii: 10.1186/s13017-024-00557-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
29Subventions
Organisme : Dutch Army Health Insurance Foundation (Stichting Ziektekostenverzekering Krijgsmacht, SZVK) and the Dutch Ministry of Defense
ID : 19-0068
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Brede JR, Lafrenz T, Klepstad P, et al. Feasibility of Pre-hospital resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the Aorta in Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(22). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014394 .
Chaudery M, Clark J, Morrison JJ, Wilson MH, Bew D, Darzi A. Can contrast-enhanced ultrasonography improve Zone III REBOA placement for prehospital care? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(1):89–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000863 .
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000863
pubmed: 26683394
Chen K, Zhang G, Li F, et al. Application of ultrasound-guided balloon occlusion in cesarean section in 130 cases of sinister placenta previa. J Interv Med. 2020;3(1):41–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.01.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2020.01.006
pubmed: 34805905
pmcid: 8562179
Ogura T, Lefor AK, Nakamura M, Fujizuka K, Shiroto K, Nakano M. Ultrasound-guided resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the Aorta in the Resuscitation Area. J Emerg Med. 2017;52(5):715–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.01.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.01.014
pubmed: 28215930
Riazanova OV, Reva VA, Fox KA, et al. Open versus endovascular REBOA control of blood loss during cesarean delivery in the placenta accreta spectrum: a single-center retrospective case control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;258:23–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.022 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.022
pubmed: 33388487
Rezende-Neto JB, Ravi A, Semple M. Magnetically trackable resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: a new non-image-guided technique for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;88(2):e87–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000002437 .
doi: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002437
pubmed: 31999658
Wessels LE, Wallace JD, Bowie J, Butler WJ, Spalding C, Krzyzaniak M. Radiofrequency Identification of the ER-REBOA: confirmation of Placement without Fluoroscopy. Mil Med. 2019;184(3–4):E285–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usy187 .
doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy187
pubmed: 30085219
Lendrum R, Perkins Z, Chana M, et al. Pre-hospital resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for exsanguinating pelvic haemorrhage. Resuscitation. 2019;135:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.12.018 .
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.12.018
pubmed: 30594600
Stensaeth KH, Sovik E, Haig IN, Skomedal E, Jorgensen A. Fluoroscopy-free resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for controlling life threatening postpartum hemorrhage. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0174520. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174520 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174520
pubmed: 28355242
pmcid: 5371310
Manning JE. Feasibility of blind aortic catheter placement in the prehospital environment to guide resuscitation in cardiac arrest. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(2 Suppl 2):S173–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318299d9ee .
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318299d9ee
pubmed: 23883904
De Schoutheete JC, Fourneau I, Waroquier F, et al. Three cases of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in austere pre-hospital environment: technical and methodological aspects. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:1–11.
doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0213-2
Linnebur M, Inaba K, Haltmeier T, et al. Emergent non-image-guided resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) catheter placement: a cadaver-based study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(3):453–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001106 .
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001106
pubmed: 27192466
Okada Y, Narumiya H, Ishi W, Iiduka R. Anatomical landmarks for safely implementing resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in zone 1 without fluoroscopy. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017;25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0411-z .
Matsumoto S, Funabiki T, Kazamaki T, et al. Placement accuracy of resuscitative endovascular occlusion balloon into the target zone with external measurement. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020;5(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2020-000443 .
Sato R, Kuriyama A, Takaesu R, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta performed by emergency physicians for traumatic hemorrhagic shock: a case series from Japanese emergency rooms. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2032-y .
doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2032-y
pubmed: 29678197
pmcid: 5910587
Weng D, Qian A, Zhou Q, Xu J, Xu S, Zhang M. A new method using surface landmarks to locate resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta based on a retrospective CTA study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(3):1945–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01686-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01686-0
pubmed: 34019107
van der Borger B, Vrancken S, van Dongen T, Wamsteker T, Rasmussen T, Hoencamp R. Comparison of aortic zones for endovascular bleeding control: age and sex differences. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(6):4963–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02033-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02033-7
Stannard A, Morrison JJ, Sharon DJ, Eliason JL, Rasmussen TE. Morphometric analysis of torso arterial anatomy with implications for resuscitative aortic occlusion. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(2 Suppl 2):S169–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a098d .
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a098d
pubmed: 23883903
Morrison JJ, Stannard A, Midwinter MJ, Sharon DJ, Eliason JL, Rasmussen TE. Prospective evaluation of the correlation between torso height and aortic anatomy in respect of a fluoroscopy free aortic balloon occlusion system. Surgery. 2014;155(6):1044–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.036 .
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.036
pubmed: 24856124
Pezy P, Flaris AN, Prat NJ, et al. Fixed-Distance Model for Balloon Placement during Fluoroscopy-Free resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the Aorta in a Civilian Population. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(4):351–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4757 .
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4757
pubmed: 27973670
pmcid: 5470425
Olsen MH, Thonghong T, Søndergaard L, Møller K. Standardized distances for placement of REBOA in patients with aortic stenosis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70364-9 .
MacTaggart JN, Poulson WE, Akhter M, et al. Morphometric roadmaps to improve accurate device delivery for fluoroscopy-free resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(6):941–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001043 .
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001043
pubmed: 27015580
pmcid: 4874847
Eliason JL, Derstine BA, Horbal SR, et al. Computed tomography correlation of skeletal landmarks and vascular anatomy in civilian adult trauma patients: implications for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87(1S):S138–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002247 .
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002247
pubmed: 31246918
Glaser J, Stigall K, Morrison J et al. The Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guideline (JTSCPG). Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) for Hemorrhagic Shock (CPG ID: 38). 2020. http://jts.amedd.army.mil/assets/docs/cpgs/JTS_Clinical_Practice_Guidelines_(CPGs)/REBOA_for_Hemorrhagic_Shock_06_Jul_2017_ID38.pdf
Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jackknife. Ann Statist. 1992;7(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_41 .
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_41
Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ. Advanced statistics:Bootstrapping confidence intervals for statistics with difficult distributions. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(4):360–5. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.018 .
doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.018
pubmed: 15805329
Cralley AL, Vigneshwar N, Moore EE, et al. Zone 1 endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta vs resuscitative thoracotomy for patient resuscitation after severe hemorrhagic shock. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(2):140. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6393 .
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6393
pubmed: 36542395
van de Voort JC, Kessel B, van der Borger BLS, DuBose JJ, Hörer TM, Hoencamp R. Consensus on resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in civilian (pre-hospital) trauma care: a Delphi study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg Published Online January. 2024;26. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004238 .
Dogan EM, Hörer TM, Edström M, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in zone I versus zone III in a porcine model of non-traumatic cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized study. Resuscitation. 2020;151:150–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.011 .
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.011
pubmed: 32339599
Halvachizadeh S, Mica L, Kalbas Y, et al. Zone-dependent acute circulatory changes in abdominal organs and extremities after resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): an experimental model. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00485-y .
Russo RM, Neff LP, Lamb CM et al. Partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in swine model of hemorrhagic shock. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223:359–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.037
Russo RM, White JM, Baer DG, Partial REBOA. A systematic review of the preclinical and clinical literature. J Surg Res. 2021;262:101–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.054 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.054
pubmed: 33561721
Sadeghi M, Hörer TM, Forsman D, et al. Blood pressure targeting by partial REBOA is possible in severe hemorrhagic shock in pigs and produces less circulatory, metabolic and inflammatory sequelae than total REBOA. Injury. 2018;49(12):2132–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.052 .
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.052
pubmed: 30301556
Sadeghi M, Hurtsén AS, Tegenfalk J, et al. End-tidal Carbon Dioxide as an Indicator of partial REBOA and distal organ metabolism in Normovolemia and hemorrhagic shock in anesthetized pigs. Shock. 2021;56(4):647–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001807 .
doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001807
pubmed: 34014885
Polcz JE, Ronaldi AE, Madurska M, et al. Next-generation REBOA (resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta) device precisely achieves targeted Regional optimization in a Porcine Model of hemorrhagic shock. J Surg Res. 2022;280:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.007
pubmed: 35939866
White JM, Ronaldi AE, Polcz JE, et al. A New Pressure-Regulated, partial REBOA device achieves targeted distal perfusion. J Surg Res. 2020;256:171–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.042 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.042
pubmed: 32707400