Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation using deep learning, clinical models and polygenic scores.

Atrial fibrillation deep learning electrocardiogram polygenic scores

Journal

European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 15 07 2024
revised: 08 08 2024
accepted: 21 08 2024
medline: 1 9 2024
pubmed: 1 9 2024
entrez: 1 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Deep learning applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) is an emerging approach for predicting atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). This study introduces an ECG-AI model developed and tested at a tertiary cardiac centre, comparing its performance with clinical and AF polygenic scores (PGS). ECG in sinus rhythm from the Montreal Heart Institute were analysed, excluding those from patients with preexisting AF. The primary outcome was incident AF at 5 years. An ECG-AI model was developed by splitting patients into non-overlapping datasets: 70% for training, 10% for validation, and 20% for testing. Performance of ECG-AI, clinical models and PGS was assessed in the test dataset. The ECG-AI model was externally validated in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) hospital dataset. A total of 669,782 ECGs from 145,323 patients were included. Mean age was 61±15 years, and 58% were male. The primary outcome was observed in 15% of patients and the ECG-AI model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78. In time-to-event analysis including the first ECG, ECG-AI inference of high risk identified 26% of the population with a 4.3-fold increased risk of incident AF (95% confidence interval 4.02-4.57). In a subgroup analysis of 2,301 patients, ECG-AI outperformed CHARGE-AF (AUC=0.62) and PGS (AUC=0.59). Adding PGS and CHARGE-AF to ECG-AI improved goodness-of-fit (likelihood ratio test p<0.001), with minimal changes to the AUC (0.76-0.77). In the external validation cohort (mean age 59±18 years, 47% male, median follow-up 1.1 year) ECG-AI model performance= remained consistent (AUC=0.77). ECG-AI provides an accurate tool to predict new-onset AF in a tertiary cardiac centre, surpassing clinical and polygenic scores.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
Deep learning applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) is an emerging approach for predicting atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). This study introduces an ECG-AI model developed and tested at a tertiary cardiac centre, comparing its performance with clinical and AF polygenic scores (PGS).
METHODS METHODS
ECG in sinus rhythm from the Montreal Heart Institute were analysed, excluding those from patients with preexisting AF. The primary outcome was incident AF at 5 years. An ECG-AI model was developed by splitting patients into non-overlapping datasets: 70% for training, 10% for validation, and 20% for testing. Performance of ECG-AI, clinical models and PGS was assessed in the test dataset. The ECG-AI model was externally validated in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) hospital dataset.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 669,782 ECGs from 145,323 patients were included. Mean age was 61±15 years, and 58% were male. The primary outcome was observed in 15% of patients and the ECG-AI model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78. In time-to-event analysis including the first ECG, ECG-AI inference of high risk identified 26% of the population with a 4.3-fold increased risk of incident AF (95% confidence interval 4.02-4.57). In a subgroup analysis of 2,301 patients, ECG-AI outperformed CHARGE-AF (AUC=0.62) and PGS (AUC=0.59). Adding PGS and CHARGE-AF to ECG-AI improved goodness-of-fit (likelihood ratio test p<0.001), with minimal changes to the AUC (0.76-0.77). In the external validation cohort (mean age 59±18 years, 47% male, median follow-up 1.1 year) ECG-AI model performance= remained consistent (AUC=0.77).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
ECG-AI provides an accurate tool to predict new-onset AF in a tertiary cardiac centre, surpassing clinical and polygenic scores.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39217446
pii: 7740534
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae595
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Gilbert Jabbour (G)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
HeartWise.Ai, Montreal, Canada.

Alexis Nolin-Lapalme (A)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
HeartWise.Ai, Montreal, Canada.
Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (MILA), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Olivier Tastet (O)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
HeartWise.Ai, Montreal, Canada.

Denis Corbin (D)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
HeartWise.Ai, Montreal, Canada.

Paloma Jordà (P)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Achille Sowa (A)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
HeartWise.Ai, Montreal, Canada.

Jacques Delfrate (J)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
HeartWise.Ai, Montreal, Canada.

David Busseuil (D)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Julie Hussin (J)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (MILA), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Marie-Pierre Dubé (MP)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Université de Montréal Beaulieu-Saucier Pharmacogenomics Center Montreal, Canada.

Jean-Claude Tardif (JC)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Université de Montréal Beaulieu-Saucier Pharmacogenomics Center Montreal, Canada.
Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Montreal, Canada.

Léna Rivard (L)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Laurent Macle (L)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Julia Cadrin-Tourigny (J)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Paul Khairy (P)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Montreal, Canada.

Robert Avram (R)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
HeartWise.Ai, Montreal, Canada.

Rafik Tadros (R)

Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Classifications MeSH