Efficacy of initial and repeat DCB angioplasty of restenotic arteriovenous fistulas compared with plain angioplasty.

Arteriovenous fistula drug-coated balloon (DCB) high-dose paclitaxel target lesion reintervention

Journal

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
ISSN: 1535-7732
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Interv Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203369

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 06 12 2023
revised: 12 08 2024
accepted: 23 08 2024
medline: 2 9 2024
pubmed: 2 9 2024
entrez: 1 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To evaluate the effect of drug-coated balloon (DCB) with high-dose paclitaxel for the treatment of restenotic dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). In this single-arm, multicenter, prospective, observational study, 334 patients using IN.PACT AV DCB (Medtronic Inc., Plymouth, MN) for the first time in the restenotic lesion of dysfunctional AVF between April 2021 and March 2022 were registered. Procedural success, defined as <30% residual stenosis, was achieved in 96.7% of cases. During a median follow-up of 7.4 months, 179 target lesion reinterventions (TLRs) were observed, and the 6-month freedom from TLR was 73.2% (68.2%-78.2%). When compared with the previous plain percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, the median time to reintervention was significantly longer with DCB (9.1 [8.0-10.6] versus 3.2 [3.0-3.4] months; P<.001). Baseline characteristics that were independently associated with TLR were: months from the last intervention (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.50 [95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.62] per doubling; P<.001), partial lesion coverage by DCB (2.13 [1.10-4.12]; P=.024), and residual stenosis after DCB (2.19 [1.53-3.12] per 15% increase; P<.001) with its time interaction (0.91 [0.86-0.97] per month; P=.003). Of the 179 TLRs, 84 used DCB once again. The median time to reintervention was significantly longer for TLR using DCB (7.1 [6.2-9.7] versus 3.3 [3.1-4.0] months; P<.001). DCB with high-dose paclitaxel is effective at both the initial treatment in the restenotic lesion of dysfunctional AVF and during TLR after DCB use. However, partial lesion coverage by DCB and residual stenosis should be avoided.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39218214
pii: S1051-0443(24)00555-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.08.022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Naoki Fujimura (N)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: naokif0212@gmail.com.

Tsutomu Hattori (T)

Ikebukuro Vascular Surgery Clinic, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: twotom723@gmail.com.

Mitsuyoshi Takahara (M)

Department of Diabetes Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. Electronic address: takahara@endmet.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Masahiko Fujihara (M)

Department of Cardiology, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Osaka, Japan. Electronic address: masahiko-fujihara@themis.ocn.ne.jp.

Takahiro Shoji (T)

Tsudanuma Vascular Clinic, Chiba, Japan. Electronic address: dr.snow720@gmail.com.

Susumu Watada (S)

Department of Surgery, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan. Electronic address: wtd446@yahoo.co.jp.

Tatsuya Shimogawara (T)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan. Electronic address: saitamashiritsu44@yahoo.co.jp.

Shigeo Ichihashi (S)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan. Electronic address: shigeoichivasc@gmail.com.

Hirohisa Harada (H)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: haradahirohisa@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH