Latent Class Analysis Reveals, in patient profiles, COVID-19-related better prognosis by calcifediol treatment than glucocorticoids.

COVID-19 COVID-treatment SARS-CoV-2 calcifediol corticoids latent class analysis vitamin D

Journal

The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology
ISSN: 1879-1220
Titre abrégé: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9015483

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 11 07 2024
revised: 25 08 2024
accepted: 26 08 2024
medline: 2 9 2024
pubmed: 2 9 2024
entrez: 1 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Calcifediol and glucocorticoids have been repositioned for the treatment of COVID-19 and may reduce severity, the need for intensive care unit admission and death. to identify class or profiles of patients hospitalized and treated with COVID-19 pneumonia using latent class clustering methods to assess the clinical and prognostic relevance of the resulting patients' profiles. Poor prognosis was defined as death or need for ICU admission, good prognosis, the opposite. With special interest in differential responses to calcifediol. Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba Spain. Patients Retrospective observational cohort study of patients admitted for COVID-19. gov public database (NCT05819918). (i) Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 90 years, (ii) Pneumonia characterized by the presence of infiltrates on chest X-ray or CT scan, (iii) SARS-CoV-2 infection, confirmed, and (iv) CURB Scale 65 >1. Latent class analysis, for obtaining homogeneous clusters, without specifying a priori the belonging group, and selecting the optimal number of clusters by minimizing information criteria. Evaluating the differences between groups for each variable by means of chi-square, Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test. 707 patients hospitalized from 10 March 2020 until 4 March 2022 were included. For the treatment variable, differences were found between class 3 (60% treated with calcifediol only) and classes 1 (less than 1% calcifediol only vs. 82% treated with both), 2 (less than 1% calcifediol only vs. 82% treated with both) and 4 (1% calcifediol only vs. 84% treated with both). Class 3, (60% with calcifediol), had a significantly better prognosis compared to patients treated with glucocorticoids alone (OR: 15.2, 95% CI: [3.73 - 142], p<0.001) or no treatment (OR: 7.38, 95% CI: [2.63 - 30.2], p<0.001). our real-life study shows that calcifediol treatment significantly reduces the need for ICU admission and improved prognosis in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in the profile of patients receiving it without glucocorticoids.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39218235
pii: S0960-0760(24)00157-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2024.106609
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05819918']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106609

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Marta Entrenas-Castillo (M)

Hospital QuironSalud Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.

Luis Manuel Entrenas-Costa (LM)

Hospital QuironSalud Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.

María P Pata (MP)

Biostatech, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Bernabé Jurado Gámez (BJ)

Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.

Cristina Muñoz-Corroto (C)

Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.

Cristina Gómez-Rebollo (C)

Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.

Estefanía Mira-Padilla (E)

Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.

Roger Bouillon (R)

Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: roger.bouillon@kuleuven.be.

Jose Manuel Quesada-Gomez (JM)

Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; CIBER de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), 28029 Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Enfermería, Farmacología y Fisioterapia, Universidad de Córdoba. 14004 Córdoba, Spain. Electronic address: jmquesada@uco.es.

Classifications MeSH