Impact of Complex Anatomy and Patient Risk Profile in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery.


Journal

The Annals of thoracic surgery
ISSN: 1552-6259
Titre abrégé: Ann Thorac Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 15030100R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 03 02 2024
revised: 03 06 2024
accepted: 16 07 2024
medline: 2 9 2024
pubmed: 2 9 2024
entrez: 1 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To assess the impact of complex mitral valve disease and patient risk profile on operative outcomes in the large cohort of the Mini-Mitral International Registry (MMIR). Patients were categorized as complex degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) (bileaflet or anterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail) and simple DMR (posterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail). Subgroup analyses was performed in low risk (EuroSCORE II<8%) and high risk (EuroSCORE II>8%) cohorts. Logistic regression model was applied to investigate the impact of valve anatomy and patient risk factors on valve repair rate and operative risk. The study cohort consisted of 4524 patients with DMR (complex DMR 1296, simple DMR 3228). Valve repair rate was 87.3% and 91% in complex and simple DMR, respectively. Predictors of valve replacement were anterior leaflet prolapse/flail, bileaflet flail, female gender, age and reoperation, whereas Barlow's disease was protective. Clinical results were comparable between complex and simple DMR. On subgroup analyses, high-risk patients showed less satisfactory outcomes with respect to both the valve repair and operative mortality rates. Our findings suggest that complex DMR can be satisfactorily addressed using minimally invasive techniques. However, while complex disease was associated with low operative risk, anterior leaflet lesions and bileaflet flail remain negative predictors of successful valve repair. Conversely, valve repair rate was less satisfactory in high-risk patients, regardless of DMR complexity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To assess the impact of complex mitral valve disease and patient risk profile on operative outcomes in the large cohort of the Mini-Mitral International Registry (MMIR).
METHODS METHODS
Patients were categorized as complex degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) (bileaflet or anterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail) and simple DMR (posterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail). Subgroup analyses was performed in low risk (EuroSCORE II<8%) and high risk (EuroSCORE II>8%) cohorts. Logistic regression model was applied to investigate the impact of valve anatomy and patient risk factors on valve repair rate and operative risk.
RESULTS RESULTS
The study cohort consisted of 4524 patients with DMR (complex DMR 1296, simple DMR 3228). Valve repair rate was 87.3% and 91% in complex and simple DMR, respectively. Predictors of valve replacement were anterior leaflet prolapse/flail, bileaflet flail, female gender, age and reoperation, whereas Barlow's disease was protective. Clinical results were comparable between complex and simple DMR. On subgroup analyses, high-risk patients showed less satisfactory outcomes with respect to both the valve repair and operative mortality rates.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that complex DMR can be satisfactorily addressed using minimally invasive techniques. However, while complex disease was associated with low operative risk, anterior leaflet lesions and bileaflet flail remain negative predictors of successful valve repair. Conversely, valve repair rate was less satisfactory in high-risk patients, regardless of DMR complexity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39218343
pii: S0003-4975(24)00699-4
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.050
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Paolo Berretta (P)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche,Ancona, Italy. Electronic address: p.berretta@icloud.com.

Antonios Pitsis (A)

Cardiac Surgery Department, European Interbalkan Medical Center,Thessaloniki, Greece.

Nikolaos Bonaros (N)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck,Innsbruck, Austria.

Jorg Kempfert (J)

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin,Germany.

Manuel Wilbring (M)

Center for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, University Heart Center Dresden,Dresden, Germany.

Pierluigi Stefano (P)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital,Firenze,Italy.

Frank Van Praet (F)

Cardiac Surgery Department, Hartcentrum OLV Aalst,Aalst, Belgium.

Joseph Lamelas (J)

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Miami,USA.

Pietro G Malvindi (PG)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche,Ancona, Italy.

Marc Gerdisch (M)

Franciscan Health Indianapolis, Indianapolis,Indiana,USA.

Davide Pacini (D)

Cardiac Surgery Department, Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna,Italy.

Tristan Yan (T)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Royal Prince Alfred Hospital,Sydney, Australia.

Mauro Rinaldi (M)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, University of Turin,Italy.

Loris Salvador (L)

Division of Cardiac Surgery, S. Bortolo Hospital,Vicenza, Italy.

Antonio Fiore (A)

Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris,France.

Torsten Doenst (T)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital,Jena, Germany.

Nguyen Hoang Dinh (NH)

University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet-Nam.

Tom C Nguyen (TC)

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, McGovern Medical School,Houston,USA.

Marco Di Eusanio (M)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche,Ancona, Italy.

Classifications MeSH