Factors influencing prophylactic surgical intervention in women with genetic predisposition for breast cancer.

BRCA breast reconstruction genetic predisposition mastectomy prophylactic

Journal

Journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1096-9098
Titre abrégé: J Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0222643

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 05 07 2024
accepted: 18 07 2024
medline: 2 9 2024
pubmed: 2 9 2024
entrez: 2 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In the United States, 5%-10% of breast cancer cases are due to genetic predisposition. Among this population, prophylactic mastectomy is viable risk-reducing option. The objective of this study is to understand the timing to prophylactic mastectomy in patients with genetic predisposition to breast cancer and uncover factors influencing this decision. This study is a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with genetic predisposition for breast cancer from 2010 to 2020. In a cohort of 506 patients with genetic predisposition for breast cancer, 154 (30.4%) underwent prophylactic mastectomy, the remainder opted for surveillance alone. The median time from diagnosis to mastectomy was 1.1 years (IQR, 0.5-3.1 years). During the surveillance period, 118 patients (33.5%) underwent breast biopsy. Of the patients with benign or atypical findings, 35 (36.8%) pursued prophylactic mastectomy, a median of 0.5 years (IQR, 0.2-1.6 years) after their gene diagnosis. The most common factor impacting the decision to undergo prophylactic mastectomy was having a family member with cancer (54.7%) followed by a personal diagnosis of other cancer(s) (27.5%). Understanding the factors influencing the decision to undergo prophylactic surgery will allow for more effective shared decision-making for primary care providers, breast surgeons, and reconstructive surgeons.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39219039
doi: 10.1002/jso.27817
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Alkabban FM, Ferguson T. Breast Cancer. In StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) Ineligible Companies; 2023.
Rojas K, Stuckey A. Breast cancer epidemiology and risk factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;59(4):651‐672.
Franceschini G, Leone AD, Terribile D, Sanchez MA, Mase R. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: what surgeons need to know. Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90(2):1.
Razdan SN, Patel V, Jewell S, McCarthy CM. Quality of life among patients after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a systematic review of patient‐reported outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(6):1409‐1421.
Eisemann BS, Spiegel AJ. Risk‐Reducing mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2018;45(1):129‐136.
Brown SL, Whiting D, Fielden HG, et al. Qualitative analysis of how patients decide that they want risk‐reducing mastectomy, and the implications for surgeons in responding to emotionally‐motivated patient requests. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0178392.
van Driel CMG, Oosterwijk JC, Meijers‐Heijboer EJ, et al. Psychological factors associated with the intention to choose for risk‐reducing mastectomy in family cancer clinic attendees. The Breast. 2016;30:66‐72.
Liede A, Cai M, Crouter TF, Niepel D, Callaghan F, Evans DG. Risk‐reducing mastectomy rates in the US: a closer examination of the Angelina Jolie effect. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;171(2):435‐442.
Blank T, Graves K, Sepucha K, Llewellyn‐Thomas H. Understanding treatment decision making: contexts, commonalities, complexities, and challenges. Ann Behav Med. 2006;32(3):211‐217.
Schmidt C. Anxiety fuels growing trends in double mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(1):djt445.
Singh T, Goparaju L, Giladi AM, Aliu O, Song DH, Fan KL. Perspectives of women who forgo post‐mastectomy breast reconstruction: a mixed methods analysis. Plastic Reconstruct Surg Global Open. 2021;9(2):e3203.
Zikmund‐Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA. Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81(suppl):S87‐S93.
Hawley ST, Jagsi R, Morrow M, et al. Social and clinical determinants of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):582‐589.
Metcalfe KA, Semple JL, Narod SA. Satisfaction with breast reconstruction in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a descriptive study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(2):360‐366.
Lloyd SM, Watson M, Oaker G, Sacks N, Querci Della Rovere U, Gui G. Understanding the experience of prophylactic bilateral mastectomy: a qualitative study of ten women. Psycho‐Oncology. 2000;9(6):473‐485.
Diez‐Sampedro A, Flowers M, Olenick M, Maltseva T, Valdes G. Women's choice regarding breastfeeding and its effect on well‐being. Nurs Womens Health. 2019;23(5):383‐389.
Margulies AL, Berveiller P, Mir O, Uzan C, Chabbert‐Buffet N, Rouzier R. Grossesse après cancer du sein: mise à jour des connaissances en 2012. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2012;41(5):418‐426.
Hvatum I, Glavin K. Mothers' experience of not breastfeeding in a breastfeeding culture. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(19‐20):3144‐3155.
Ystrom E. Breastfeeding cessation and symptoms of anxiety and depression: a longitudinal cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:36.
Kurian AW, Lichtensztajn DY, Keegan THM, Nelson DO, Clarke CA, Gomez SL. Use of and mortality after bilateral mastectomy compared with other surgical treatments for breast cancer in California, 1998–2011. JAMA. 2014;312(9):902‐914.
Morrow M, Scott SK, Menck HR, Mustoe TA, Winchester DP. Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192(1):1‐8.
Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S‐13S.
Eldor L, Spiegel A. Breast reconstruction after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast J. 2009;15(suppl 1):S81‐S89.
Cragun D, Weidner A, Lewis C, et al. Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population‐based sample of young breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2017;123(13):2497‐2505.
Domchek SM, Yao S, Chen F, et al. Comparison of the prevalence of pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes in Black women and non‐Hispanic White women with breast cancer in the United States. JAMA Oncology. 2021;7(7):1045‐1050.
Warner ET, Tamimi RM, Hughes ME, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer survival: mediating effect of tumor characteristics and sociodemographic and treatment factors. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(20):2254‐2261.
Fayanju OM, Edmonds CE, Reyes SA, et al. The landmark series‐addressing disparities in breast cancer screening: new recommendations for Black women. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(1):58‐67.

Auteurs

Pooja Humar (P)

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Zainab Balogun (Z)

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Nerone Douglas (N)

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Anne Glenney (A)

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Nicolás M Kass (NM)

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Elizabeth A Moroni (EA)

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Phuong L Mai (PL)

Center for Clinical Genetics and Genomics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Emilia Diego (E)

Department of General Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Carolyn De La Cruz (C)

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Classifications MeSH