Comparison of Knotless Versus Knot-Tying Suture Anchors for Arthroscopic Repair of Hip Labral Tears.

clinical outcomes femoroacetabular impingement syndrome hip arthroscopic surgery hip labral tears knot-tying anchors knotless anchors

Journal

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 16 03 2024
accepted: 04 04 2024
medline: 2 9 2024
pubmed: 2 9 2024
entrez: 2 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Both knotless and knot-tying anchors are commonly employed in the arthroscopic repair of hip labral tears. To compare the midterm clinical results of arthroscopic hip labral repair using knot-tying versus knotless suture anchors. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair between January 2017 and January 2021 and who had at least 2 years of follow-up were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the suture anchor type: a 2.9-mm knotless suture anchor (knotless group) or a 1.8-mm knot-tying suture anchor (knot-tying group). All patients underwent femoroplasty for cam lesions and acetabular rim trimming for pincer lesions. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were administered both preoperatively and postoperatively. The consistency of the outcome scores was assessed using the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State. The statistical significance between groups was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test and quantile-based analysis of variance. A total of 413 patients were included: 256 patients in the knotless group (median age, 35 years [interquartile range, 31-38 years]; median follow-up, 34 months) and 157 patients in the knot-tying group (median age, 34 years [interquartile range, 30-38 years]; median follow-up, 25 months). There were no significant differences in postoperative mHHS, HOS-ADL, or iHOT-12 scores between the 2 groups. However, there were significant differences, favoring the knotless group over the knot-tying group, in postoperative HOS-SSS (87 ± 2 vs 86 ± 1, respectively) and VAS pain (1 vs 2, respectively) scores ( In this study, patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair with knotless suture anchors had slightly better postoperative HOS-SSS and VAS pain scores and a lower incidence of postoperative synovitis compared with patients who underwent repair with knot-tying suture anchors.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Both knotless and knot-tying anchors are commonly employed in the arthroscopic repair of hip labral tears.
Purpose UNASSIGNED
To compare the midterm clinical results of arthroscopic hip labral repair using knot-tying versus knotless suture anchors.
Study Design UNASSIGNED
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair between January 2017 and January 2021 and who had at least 2 years of follow-up were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the suture anchor type: a 2.9-mm knotless suture anchor (knotless group) or a 1.8-mm knot-tying suture anchor (knot-tying group). All patients underwent femoroplasty for cam lesions and acetabular rim trimming for pincer lesions. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were administered both preoperatively and postoperatively. The consistency of the outcome scores was assessed using the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State. The statistical significance between groups was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test and quantile-based analysis of variance.
Results UNASSIGNED
A total of 413 patients were included: 256 patients in the knotless group (median age, 35 years [interquartile range, 31-38 years]; median follow-up, 34 months) and 157 patients in the knot-tying group (median age, 34 years [interquartile range, 30-38 years]; median follow-up, 25 months). There were no significant differences in postoperative mHHS, HOS-ADL, or iHOT-12 scores between the 2 groups. However, there were significant differences, favoring the knotless group over the knot-tying group, in postoperative HOS-SSS (87 ± 2 vs 86 ± 1, respectively) and VAS pain (1 vs 2, respectively) scores (
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
In this study, patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair with knotless suture anchors had slightly better postoperative HOS-SSS and VAS pain scores and a lower incidence of postoperative synovitis compared with patients who underwent repair with knot-tying suture anchors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39221045
doi: 10.1177/23259671241265737
pii: 10.1177_23259671241265737
pmc: PMC11363226
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

23259671241265737

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Acibadem University (ref No. ATADEK-2023/14).

Auteurs

Aytek Huseyin Celiksoz (AH)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Eskisehir City Hospital, Eskisehir, Turkey.

Berhan Bayram (B)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Tahir Koray Yozgatli (TK)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Edip Yilmaz (E)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Ali Yassin (A)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Asim Kayaalp (A)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cankaya Hospital for Orthopedic Care, Ankara, Turkey.

Baris Kocaoglu (B)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH