Flecainide to Prevent Atrial Arrhythmia after Patent Foramen Ovale Closure, the AFLOAT Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.


Journal

Circulation
ISSN: 1524-4539
Titre abrégé: Circulation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0147763

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Sep 2024
Historique:
medline: 2 9 2024
pubmed: 2 9 2024
entrez: 2 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The real incidence of atrial arrhythmia (AA) after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and whether this complication can be prevented remain unknown. This study assessed if flecainide is effective to prevent AA during the first 3 months after PFO closure, and if 6 months treatment by flecainide is more effective than 3 months to prevent AA after PFO closure. AFLOAT is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, superiority trial with a blind evaluation of all the endpoints (PROBE design). Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio after PFO closure to receive flecainide (150 mg once a day in a sustained-release (SR) dose) for 3 months, flecainide (150 mg od SR dose) for 6 months, or no additional treatment (standard-of-care) for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with at least one episode AA (≥30s) recorded within 3 months after PFO closure on long-term monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). The secondary endpoint was the percentage of patients with at least one episode of AA (≥30s) recorded with ICM during the 3-6 months period after PFO closure. 186 patients were included (mean age 54 years, male 68.8%) and AA (≥30s) occurred in 53 (28.5%) patients during the 6-month follow-up; 86.8% of these AA events occurred in the first month after PFO closure. The primary outcome occurred in 33/123 (26.8%) and 16/63 (25.4%) patients receiving flecainide for at least 3 months or standard of care, respectively [Risk Difference (RD) 1.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -12.9% to 13.8%, NS]. The secondary endpoint occurred in 3/60 (5.0%), 4/63 (6.3%), and 5/63 (7.9%) patients receiving flecainide 6 months, 3 months or standard of care, respectively [RD -2.9%; 95% CI -12.7% to 6.9%, and RD -1.6%; 95% CI -11.8% to 8.6%, respectively]. In the first 6 months following successful PFO closure, AA (≥30s) occurred in 28.5% of cases, mostly in the first month after the procedure. Flecainide did not prevent AA after PFO closure.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The real incidence of atrial arrhythmia (AA) after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and whether this complication can be prevented remain unknown. This study assessed if flecainide is effective to prevent AA during the first 3 months after PFO closure, and if 6 months treatment by flecainide is more effective than 3 months to prevent AA after PFO closure.
METHODS METHODS
AFLOAT is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, superiority trial with a blind evaluation of all the endpoints (PROBE design). Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio after PFO closure to receive flecainide (150 mg once a day in a sustained-release (SR) dose) for 3 months, flecainide (150 mg od SR dose) for 6 months, or no additional treatment (standard-of-care) for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with at least one episode AA (≥30s) recorded within 3 months after PFO closure on long-term monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). The secondary endpoint was the percentage of patients with at least one episode of AA (≥30s) recorded with ICM during the 3-6 months period after PFO closure.
RESULTS RESULTS
186 patients were included (mean age 54 years, male 68.8%) and AA (≥30s) occurred in 53 (28.5%) patients during the 6-month follow-up; 86.8% of these AA events occurred in the first month after PFO closure. The primary outcome occurred in 33/123 (26.8%) and 16/63 (25.4%) patients receiving flecainide for at least 3 months or standard of care, respectively [Risk Difference (RD) 1.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -12.9% to 13.8%, NS]. The secondary endpoint occurred in 3/60 (5.0%), 4/63 (6.3%), and 5/63 (7.9%) patients receiving flecainide 6 months, 3 months or standard of care, respectively [RD -2.9%; 95% CI -12.7% to 6.9%, and RD -1.6%; 95% CI -11.8% to 8.6%, respectively].
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In the first 6 months following successful PFO closure, AA (≥30s) occurred in 28.5% of cases, mostly in the first month after the procedure. Flecainide did not prevent AA after PFO closure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39222035
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071186
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Marie Hauguel-Moreau (M)

Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin, INSERM U1018, CESP, ACTION Study Group, Department of Cardiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital (AP-HP), Boulogne, France.

Paul Guedeney (P)

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, ICAN - Institute of CardioMetabolism and Nutrition, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Claire Dauphin (C)

Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Vincent Auffret (V)

University of Rennes, Rennes University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Inserm LTSI U1099, F 35000 Rennes, France.

Jen-Michel Clerc (JM)

Cardiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France, FRANCE.

Eloi Marijon (E)

Cardiology Department, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France.

Meyer Elbaz (M)

Department of Cardiology, Institute CARDIOMET, CHU-Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Philippe Aldebert (P)

Cardiology Division, Hôpital La Timone, Marseille, France.

Farzin Beygui (F)

CHU de la Côte de Nacre, Département de Cardiologie, Caen, France.

Wissam Abi Khalil (W)

Institut Mitovasc, University of Angers, UMR CNRS 6015-INSERMU1083, Angers, France.

Antoine Da Costa (A)

Service de cardiologie, hôpital Nord, université Jean-Monnet, CHU de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.

Jean-Christophe Macia (JC)

Montpellier University Hospital, UFR de Médecine, Université Montpellier 1, Department of Cardiology, 371, avenue du Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, Montpellier 5, France.

Simon Elhadad (S)

Service de Cardiologie, Centre hospitalier de Marne-la-Vallée, Jossigny, France.

Guillaume Cayla (G)

Cardiology Department, Nimes University Hospital, Montpellier University, ACTION Group, Nimes, France.

Xavier Iriart (X)

Bordeaux University Hospital, Department of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease. National Reference Center M3C, IHU Lyric INSERM UF 1045, Bordeaux, France.

Mikael Laredo (M)

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, ICAN - Institute of CardioMetabolism and Nutrition, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France; Electrophysiology Unit, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Thomas Rolland (T)

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, ICAN - Institute of CardioMetabolism and Nutrition, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France; Electrophysiology Unit, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Yassine Temmar (Y)

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, ICAN - Institute of CardioMetabolism and Nutrition, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France; Electrophysiology Unit, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Maria Elisabeta Gheorghiu (ME)

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, ICAN - Institute of CardioMetabolism and Nutrition, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France; Electrophysiology Unit, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Delphine Brugier (D)

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, ICAN - Institute of CardioMetabolism and Nutrition, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Johanne Silvain (J)

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, ICAN - Institute of CardioMetabolism and Nutrition, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Nadjib Hammoudi (N)

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, ICAN - Institute of CardioMetabolism and Nutrition, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Guillaume Duthoit (G)

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, ICAN - Institute of CardioMetabolism and Nutrition, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France; Electrophysiology Unit, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Abdourahmane Diallo (A)

ACTION Study Group, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Lariboisière, (APHP), Université Paris-Diderot Paris 7, Paris, France.

Eric Vicaut (E)

ACTION Study Group, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Lariboisière, (APHP), Université Paris-Diderot Paris 7, Paris, France.

Gilles Montalescot (G)

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS1166, ICAN - Institute of CardioMetabolism and Nutrition, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH