Occupational Exposure to Silica Dust and Silicosis Risk in Chinese Noncoal Mines: Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Assessment.


Journal

JMIR public health and surveillance
ISSN: 2369-2960
Titre abrégé: JMIR Public Health Surveill
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101669345

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 11 01 2024
accepted: 04 07 2024
revised: 14 05 2024
medline: 2 9 2024
pubmed: 2 9 2024
entrez: 2 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite increasing awareness, silica dust-induced silicosis still contributes to the huge disease burden in China. Worryingly, recent silica dust exposure levels and silicosis risk in Chinese noncoal mines remain unclear. We aimed to determine recent silica dust exposure levels and assess the risk of silicosis in Chinese noncoal mines. Between May and December 2020, we conducted a retrospective cohort study on 3 noncoal mines and 1 public hospital to establish, using multivariable Cox regression analyses, prediction formulas of the silicosis cumulative hazard ratio (H) and incidence (I) and a cross-sectional study on 155 noncoal mines in 10 Chinese provinces to determine the prevalence of silica dust exposure (PDE), free silica content, and total dust and respirable dust concentrations. The qualitative risk of silicosis was assessed using the International Mining and Metals Commission's risk-rating table and the occupational hazard risk index; the quantitative risk was assessed using prediction formulas. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant differences in the silicosis probability between silica dust-exposed male and female miners (log-rank test χ21=7.52, P=.01). A total of 126 noncoal mines, with 29,835 miners and 4623 dust samples, were included; 13,037 (43.7%) miners were exposed to silica dust, of which 12,952 (99.3%) were male. The median PDE, free silica content, total dust concentration, and respirable dust concentration were 61.6%, 27.6%, 1.30 mg/m3, and 0.58 mg/m3, respectively, indicating that miners in nonmetal, nonferrous metal, small, and open-pit mines suffer high-level exposure to silica dust. Comprehensive qualitative risk assessment showed noncoal miners had a medium risk of silicosis, and the risks caused by total silica dust and respirable silica dust exposure were high and medium, respectively. When predicting H and I over the next 10, 20, and 30 years, we assumed that the miner gender was male. Under exposure to current total silica dust concentrations, median I10, I20, and I30 would be 6.8%, 25.1%, and 49.9%, respectively. Under exposure to current respirable silica dust concentrations, median I10, I20, and I30 would be 6.8%, 27.7%, and 57.4%, respectively. These findings showed that miners in nonmetal, nonferrous metal, small, and open-pit mines have a higher I and higher qualitative silicosis risk. Chinese noncoal miners, especially those in nonmetal, nonferrous metal, small, and open-pit mines, still suffer high-level exposure to silica dust and a medium-level risk of silicosis. Data of both total silica dust and respirable silica dust are vital for occupational health risk assessment in order to devise effective control measures to reduce noncoal mine silica dust levels, improve miners' working environment, and reduce the risk of silicosis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite increasing awareness, silica dust-induced silicosis still contributes to the huge disease burden in China. Worryingly, recent silica dust exposure levels and silicosis risk in Chinese noncoal mines remain unclear.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We aimed to determine recent silica dust exposure levels and assess the risk of silicosis in Chinese noncoal mines.
METHODS METHODS
Between May and December 2020, we conducted a retrospective cohort study on 3 noncoal mines and 1 public hospital to establish, using multivariable Cox regression analyses, prediction formulas of the silicosis cumulative hazard ratio (H) and incidence (I) and a cross-sectional study on 155 noncoal mines in 10 Chinese provinces to determine the prevalence of silica dust exposure (PDE), free silica content, and total dust and respirable dust concentrations. The qualitative risk of silicosis was assessed using the International Mining and Metals Commission's risk-rating table and the occupational hazard risk index; the quantitative risk was assessed using prediction formulas.
RESULTS RESULTS
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant differences in the silicosis probability between silica dust-exposed male and female miners (log-rank test χ21=7.52, P=.01). A total of 126 noncoal mines, with 29,835 miners and 4623 dust samples, were included; 13,037 (43.7%) miners were exposed to silica dust, of which 12,952 (99.3%) were male. The median PDE, free silica content, total dust concentration, and respirable dust concentration were 61.6%, 27.6%, 1.30 mg/m3, and 0.58 mg/m3, respectively, indicating that miners in nonmetal, nonferrous metal, small, and open-pit mines suffer high-level exposure to silica dust. Comprehensive qualitative risk assessment showed noncoal miners had a medium risk of silicosis, and the risks caused by total silica dust and respirable silica dust exposure were high and medium, respectively. When predicting H and I over the next 10, 20, and 30 years, we assumed that the miner gender was male. Under exposure to current total silica dust concentrations, median I10, I20, and I30 would be 6.8%, 25.1%, and 49.9%, respectively. Under exposure to current respirable silica dust concentrations, median I10, I20, and I30 would be 6.8%, 27.7%, and 57.4%, respectively. These findings showed that miners in nonmetal, nonferrous metal, small, and open-pit mines have a higher I and higher qualitative silicosis risk.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Chinese noncoal miners, especially those in nonmetal, nonferrous metal, small, and open-pit mines, still suffer high-level exposure to silica dust and a medium-level risk of silicosis. Data of both total silica dust and respirable silica dust are vital for occupational health risk assessment in order to devise effective control measures to reduce noncoal mine silica dust levels, improve miners' working environment, and reduce the risk of silicosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39222341
pii: v10i1e56283
doi: 10.2196/56283
doi:

Substances chimiques

Silicon Dioxide 7631-86-9
Dust 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e56283

Informations de copyright

©Kai Liu, Xin Sun, Wei-Jiang Hu, Liang-Ying Mei, Heng-Dong Zhang, Shi-Biao Su, Kang Ning, Yun-Feng Nie, Le-Ping Qiu, Ying Xia, Lei Han, Qiang Zhi, Chun-Bo Shi, Geng Wang, Wei Wen, Jian-Qiong Gao, Bing Yu, Xin Wang, Yi-Wen Dong, Ning Kang, Feng Han, Hong-Ying Bian, Yong-Qing Chen, Meng Ye. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 02.09.2024.

Auteurs

Kai Liu (K)

National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Xin Sun (X)

National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Wei-Jiang Hu (WJ)

National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Liang-Ying Mei (LY)

Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.

Heng-Dong Zhang (HD)

Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.

Shi-Biao Su (SB)

Institute of Occupational Health Assessment, Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China.

Kang Ning (K)

Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Liaoning Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenyang, China.

Yun-Feng Nie (YF)

Department of Health Risk Assessment, Hunan Prevention and Treatment Institute for Occupational Diseases, Changsha, China.

Le-Ping Qiu (LP)

Institute of Occupational Health and Radiological Health, Sichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, China.

Ying Xia (Y)

Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.

Lei Han (L)

Institute of Occupational Disease Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.

Qiang Zhi (Q)

Department of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hohhot, China.

Chun-Bo Shi (CB)

Institute of Occupational Health and Public Health, Qinghai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xining, China.

Geng Wang (G)

Institute of Occupational Health and Public Health, Qinghai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xining, China.

Wei Wen (W)

Institute of Occupational Health Assessment, Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, China.

Jian-Qiong Gao (JQ)

Department of Occupational Disease Prevention and Control, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hohhot, China.

Bing Yu (B)

Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefectural Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Enshi, China.

Xin Wang (X)

National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Yi-Wen Dong (YW)

National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Ning Kang (N)

National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Feng Han (F)

National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Hong-Ying Bian (HY)

National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Yong-Qing Chen (YQ)

National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Meng Ye (M)

National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH