Comparison of the Accuracy and Reliability of Instrumental Shade Selection Devices and Visual Shade Selection: An in Vitro Study.
Journal
Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1708-8240
Titre abrégé: J Esthet Restor Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101096515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Sep 2024
02 Sep 2024
Historique:
revised:
16
08
2024
received:
10
05
2024
accepted:
19
08
2024
medline:
2
9
2024
pubmed:
2
9
2024
entrez:
2
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
New shade-matching devices are available for clinical use, but their accuracy and reliability have not been investigated. This in vitro study compared the accuracy and reliability of a shade-matching colorimeter (Optishade), a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade V), and visual shade matching in simulated clinical conditions. Shade matching was conducted with two digital devices; (Optishade and Vita Easyshade) and the visual shade selection method, with a new 16-tab Vita Classical shade guide. Shade tabs were placed within a gingival matrix and measurements were taken from the central area of each shade tab enclosed in a black box to simulate the oral cavity. Visual assessments were conducted independently by two examiners. For the reliability assessment, each shade tab was measured 20 times by each examiner. Accuracy was calculated as a percentage of the matching readings with the actual shade per each tab. Data were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA test (α = 0.05) and Pairwise Comparison (Bonferroni Post hoc Test) to assess accuracy. The reliability evaluation was conducted by comparison between both examiners using mean and standard deviation; by a two-tailed t-test for the independent samples for all the three groups included in the study. The shade matching accuracy of Optishade was 97.50%, Vita Easyshade 89.38%, and visual method 62.19%. Statistically, high significant difference in accuracy (p < 0.001) was found when comparing both Optishade and VITA Easyshade with the visual method. Additionally, there was statistically significant difference in accuracy (p < 0.05) when Optishade was compared to Vita Easyshade. The reliability of the Optishade was 99.6% and Vita Easy shade was 99.38%. Statistically, showed no statistically significant difference in the reliability of shade match obtained within the same group when comparing the readings of Examiner 1 and Examiner 2 (p > 0.05). The colorimeter demonstrated the highest accuracy, followed by the spectrophotometer, and the visual shade selection method. Both digital methods investigated in this study showed comparable reliability. The results of this study emphasize the clinical advantage of digital shade-matching devices over visual shade-matching. The colorimeter offers high accuracy for shade matching and should be considered to use for shade matching especially with restorations in the esthetic zone.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
M. B. Blatz, G. Chiche, O. Bahat, R. Roblee, C. Coachman, and H. O. Heymann, “Evolution of Aesthetic Dentistry,” Journal of Dental Research 98 (2019): 1294–1304.
F. Floriani, B.‐A. Brandfon, N. J. Sawczuk, G.‐C. Lopes, M.‐G. Rocha, and D. Oliveira, “Color Difference Between the Vita Classical Shade Guide and Composite Veneers Using the Dual‐Layer Technique,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry 14 (2022): e615–e620.
R. C. Sproull, “Color Matching in Dentistry. Part II. Practical Applications of the Organization of Color,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 86 (2001): 458–464.
S. A. Bahannan, “Shade Matching Quality Among Dental Students Using Visual and Instrumental Methods,” Journal of Dentistry 42 (2014): 48–52.
L. A. Cherkas, “Communicating Precise Color Matching and Cosmetic Excellence,” Dentistry Today 20 (2001): 52–57.
H. Chen, J. Huang, X. Dong, et al., “A Systematic Review of Visual and Instrumental Measurements for Tooth Shade Matching,” Quintessence International 43 (2012): 649–659.
W. F. Liberato, E. N. De Almeida, M. A. Gallito, A. L. Faria‐e‐Silva, L. F. J. Schneider, and L. M. A. Cavalcante, “Influence of a Gray Background and the Illuminant on Tooth Shade Selection,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry S0022‐3913, no. 23 (2024): 824–827.
D. Dudea, C. Gasparik, A. Botos, F. Alb, A. Irimie, and R. D. Paravina, “Influence of Background/Surrounding Area on Accuracy of Visual Color Matching,” Clinical Oral Investigations 20 (2016): 1167–1173.
S. Abu‐Hossin, Y. Onbasi, L. Berger, et al., “Comparison of Digital and Visual Tooth Shade Selection,” Clinical and Experimental Dental Research 9 (2023): 368–374.
M. A. Akl, D. E. Mansour, and F. Zheng, “The Role of Intraoral Scanners in the Shade Matching Process: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Prosthodontics 32 (2023): 196–203.
R. Ranabhatt, K. Singh, R. Siddharth, S. Tripathi, and D. Arya, “Color Matching in Facial Prosthetics: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 17 (2017): 3–7.
S. J. Chu, R. D. Trushkowsky, and R. D. Paravina, “Dental Color Matching Instruments and Systems. Review of Clinical and Research Aspects,” Journal of Dentistry 38 (2010): e2–e16.
M. H. Kalantari, S. A. Ghoraishian, and M. Mohaghegh, “Evaluation of Accuracy of Shade Selection Using Two Spectrophotometer Systems: Vita Easyshade and Degudent Shadepilot Eur,” Journal of Dentistry 11 (2017): 196–200.
S. J. Paul, A. Peter, L. Rodoni, and N. Pietrobon, “Conventional Visual vs Spectrophotometric Shade Taking for Porcelain‐Fused‐To‐Metal Crowns: A Clinical Comparison,” International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 24 (2004): 222–231.
N. Alghazali, A. Preston, M. Moaleem, F. Jarad, A. A. Aldosari, and P. Smith, “The Effects of Different Spectrophotometric Modes on Colour Measurement of Resin Composite and Porcelain Materials,” European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry 26 (2018): 163–173.
A.‐L. Klotz, Y. Habibi, A. J. Hassel, P. Rammelsberg, and A. Zenthöfer, “How Reliable and Accurate Is the Shade Determination of Premolars by Spectrophotometry?” Clinical Oral Investigations 24 (2020): 1439–1444.
W. D. Browning, D. C. Chan, J. S. Blalock, and M. G. Brackett, “A Comparison of Human Raters and an Intra‐Oral Spectrophotometer,” Operative Dentistry 34 (2009): 337–343.
F. Tabatabaian, E. Beyabanaki, P. Alirezaei, and S. Epakchi, “Visual and Digital Tooth Shade Selection Methods, Related Effective Factors and Conditions, and Their Accuracy and Precision: A Literature Review,” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 33 (2021): 1084–1104.
L. Karaagaclioglu, H. Terzioglu, B. Yilmaz, and B. Yurdukoru, “In Vivo and in Vitro Assessment of an Intraoral Dental Colorimeter,” Journal of Prosthodontics 19 (2010): 279–285.
F. F. Tung, G. R. Goldstein, S. Jang, and E. Hittelman, “The Repeatability of an Intraoral Dental Colorimeter,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 88 (2002): 585–590.
D. Öngül, B. Şermet, and M. C. Balkaya, “Visual and Instrumental Evaluation of Color Match Ability of 2 Shade Guides on a Ceramic System,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 108 (2012): 9–14.
A. Almalki, J. Conejo, A. Wünsche, et al., “Digital Smile Design and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Restorations in a Complex Esthetic Case,” Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 43 (2022): 664–668.
M. Zimmermann and A. Mehl, “Virtual Smile Design Systems: A Current Review,” International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 18 (2015): 303–317.
A. Almalki, J. Conejo, N. Kutkut, et al., “Evaluation of the Accuracy of Direct Intraoral Scanner Impressions for Digital Post and Core in Various Post Lengths: An in‐Vitro Study,” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 36, no. 4 (2023): 673–679.
K. Ebeid, A. Sabet, and A. Della Bona, “Accuracy and Repeatability of Different Intraoral Scanners on Shade Determination,” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 33 (2021): 844–848.
M. Revilla‐León, M. M. Methani, and M. Özcan, “Impact of the Ambient Light Illuminance Conditions on the Shade Matching Capabilities of an Intraoral Scanner,” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 33 (2021): 906–912.
S. Kim‐Pusateri, J. D. Brewer, E. L. Davis, and A. G. Wee, “Reliability and Accuracy of Four Dental Shade‐Matching Devices,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 101 (2009): 193–199.
F. M. Curd, T. R. Jasinevicius, A. Graves, V. Cox, and A. Sadan, “Comparison of the Shade Matching Ability of Dental Students Using Two Light Sources,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 96 (2006): 391–396.
S. Kim‐Pusateri, J. D. Brewer, R. G. Dunford, and A. G. Wee, “In Vitro Model to Evaluate Reliability and Accuracy of a Dental Shade‐Matching Instrument,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 98 (2007): 353–358.
A. Tsiliagkou, S. Diamantopoulou, E. Papazoglou, and A. Kakaboura, “Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Three Dental Color‐Matching Devices,” International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 11 (2016): 110–124.
S. Borse and S. H. Chaware, “Tooth Shade Analysis and Selection in Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 20 (2020): 131–140.
E. Mahn, S. C. Tortora, B. Olate, F. Cacciuttolo, J. Kernitsky, and G. Jorquera, “Comparison of Visual Analog Shade Matching, a Digital Visual Method With a Cross‐Polarized Light Filter, and a Spectrophotometer for Dental Color Matching,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 125 (2021): 511–516.
R. Lazar, B. Culic, C. Gasparik, C. Lazar, and D. Dudea, “The Accuracy of Dental Shade Matching Using Cross‐Polarization Photography,” International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 22 (2019): 343–351.
S. Alsaleh, M. Labban, M. AlHariri, and E. Tashkandi, “Evaluation of Self Shade Matching Ability of Dental Students Using Visual and Instrumental Means,” Journal of Dentistry 40, no. S1 (2012): e82–e87.
J. D. Da Silva, S. E. Park, H.‐P. Weber, and S. Ishikawa‐Nagai, “Clinical Performance of a Newly Developed Spectrophotometric System on Tooth Color Reproduction,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 99 (2008): 361–368.
L. Hardan, R. Bourgi, C. E. Cuevas‐Suárez, et al., “Novel Trends in Dental Color Match Using Different Shade Selection Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Materials (Basel) 15 (2022): 468.
D. Knezović, D. Zlatarić, I. Ž. Illeš, M. Alajbeg, and Žagar, “In Vivo and in Vitro Evaluations of Repeatability and Accuracy of VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 Dental Shade‐Matching Device,” Acta Stomatologica Croatica 49 (2015): 112–118.
W. F. Liberato, I. C. Barreto, P. P. Costa, C. C. de Almeida, W. Pimentel, and R. Tiossi, “A Comparison Between Visual, Intraoral Scanner, and Spectrophotometer Shade Matching: A Clinical Study,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 121 (2019): 271–275.
Q. Li and Y. N. Wang, “Comparison of Shade Matching by Visual Observation and an Intraoral Dental Colorimeter,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 34 (2007): 848–854.