Nail Bed Injury Repair: Nail Plate Replacement Versus Non-replacement.

Germinal Matrix Nail Bed Nail Plate

Journal

Eplasty
ISSN: 1937-5719
Titre abrégé: Eplasty
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101316107

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
medline: 3 9 2024
pubmed: 3 9 2024
entrez: 3 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although nail bed injuries are common, there is no consensus on the proper course of treatment in regard to nail plate replacement. Nail plate replacement risks infection and injury of the germinal matrix. It is our hypothesis that functional and cosmetic outcomes of the nail will not differ by nail plate replacement following nail bed repair. This is a single institution, prospective, randomized control study comparing nail plate replacement versus non-replacement in patients undergoing nail bed repair. Primary outcome included nail growth and cosmesis using the Zook classification system. Secondary outcomes were pain, functional limitation, and patient satisfaction. Statistical significance was set at Fifty patients were enrolled, 26 (52%) randomized to the non-replacement group and 24 (48%) to the replacement group. All patients who followed up had nail growth by 4 months after nail bed repair (N = 28). In the non-replacement group 4 patients continued to have pain in the affected nail bed compared with 2 patients in the replacement group ( Statistical and clinical differences were not identified in regard to cosmesis, pain, functional use of the hand, or patient satisfaction. There are established risks involved in nail plate replacement such as infection and injury to the germinal matrix. If outcomes are not different based on nail plate replacement following nail bed repair, non- replacement may be the preferable treatment option so as to avoid these complications.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Although nail bed injuries are common, there is no consensus on the proper course of treatment in regard to nail plate replacement. Nail plate replacement risks infection and injury of the germinal matrix. It is our hypothesis that functional and cosmetic outcomes of the nail will not differ by nail plate replacement following nail bed repair.
Methods UNASSIGNED
This is a single institution, prospective, randomized control study comparing nail plate replacement versus non-replacement in patients undergoing nail bed repair. Primary outcome included nail growth and cosmesis using the Zook classification system. Secondary outcomes were pain, functional limitation, and patient satisfaction. Statistical significance was set at
Results UNASSIGNED
Fifty patients were enrolled, 26 (52%) randomized to the non-replacement group and 24 (48%) to the replacement group. All patients who followed up had nail growth by 4 months after nail bed repair (N = 28). In the non-replacement group 4 patients continued to have pain in the affected nail bed compared with 2 patients in the replacement group (
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Statistical and clinical differences were not identified in regard to cosmesis, pain, functional use of the hand, or patient satisfaction. There are established risks involved in nail plate replacement such as infection and injury to the germinal matrix. If outcomes are not different based on nail plate replacement following nail bed repair, non- replacement may be the preferable treatment option so as to avoid these complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39224408
pii: Eplasty
pmc: PMC11367160

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e37

Informations de copyright

© 2024 HMP Global. All Rights Reserved. Any views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and/or participants and do not necessarily reflect the views, policy, or position of ePlasty or HMP Global, their employees, and affiliates.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosures: The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest in the information and production of this manuscript. The authors received no financial support for the preparation, research, authorship, and publication of this manuscript.

Auteurs

Justin Rock (J)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

Adam Kurland (A)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

Dominick V Congiusta (DV)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

Omkar Baxi (O)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

Michael M Vosbikian (MM)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

Irfan H Ahmed (IH)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

Classifications MeSH